Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Jonny 290
May 5, 2005



[ASK] me about OS/2 Warp
its not the size it's the 100,000:1 lower power requirements.

Sadly the boomer shitheads got scared of nuke power so it wouldn't be feasible. otherwise i'm with you OP

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jonny 290
May 5, 2005



[ASK] me about OS/2 Warp

curious lump posted:

I wouldn't consider that 'crashing'. More of a problem with faulty materials. Modern computers not only have to worry about hardware failure, but also programs and the OS crashing the computer, whereas ENIAC only had to deal with the first.

i don't think you fully understand what it's like when the term "one hour average uptime" is involved

relative to that, no. modern computesr do not have to worry about hardware failure

  • Locked thread