|
One would think if that you're going to spend a bunch of time working on then/now photography you'd invest some actual effort getting the angles right instead of "gently caress it, close enough."
|
#
¿
Aug 9, 2015 21:55
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 18:26 |
|
|
thetzar posted:Ok, yeah, the name was poorly chosen and the angles aren't exact. But are we supposed to be making GBS threads on this work? Because I don't want to poo poo on this work. I dig it. There's some bad work in there, like putting an iphone on a table with the current weather on the screen and taking a picture of it. Why bother? But there is some curious stuff in there too. I guess they all can't be zingers.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2015 16:45
|
|
|
Also loves buses and out of focus wildlife.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2015 13:32
|
|
|
"This shot is slightly blurred by camera motion - but you try to get a 400mm shot at 1/40th second!" You know there's a fix for that, bud.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
It's okay, the light and angles were the photographer's choice.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 11, 2015 02:37
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Sep 24, 2015 21:04
|
|
|
I would argue that the only people who are enthusiastic about the swastika are also enthusiastic about Nazis, no matter how enthusiastically they argue that "it was originally a symbol of peace!" and is therefore still a noble emblem. I mean maybe it is, I'm not trying to debate that. But their motivations are suspect.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2015 22:31
|
|
|
nice feeling of mario kart there steffan
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
The secret is to stop using flickr. They're pretty good with the actual image hosting part of their job but the community blows rear end.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2015 18:59
|
|
|
This is why the internet is awesome. Terrible things become amazing.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2015 20:13
|
|
|
He opened himself up to nitpicking details when he went ballistic about his copyright and started blabbing about his professional career as if it gives his opinion more merit than anyone else's.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2015 16:26
|
|
|
ExecuDork posted:Is that the photographer in the reflection in the window? Where did this idea come from that you have to be looking away from your camera and away from what you're shooting in order to make a great shot? lovely "amazing!!11!!!!1!" photos and making-of-lovely-amazing-photos series often seem to show this. Don't think so, think that's someone inside the restaurant. You can see the photographer's reflection though, he's wearing blue. I want to know why that dude is so angry about a chess game that is apparently three moves old. Also it's nice to have confirmation that the secret to getting onto "best of" lists is producing uninspired clones of poo poo that everyone else does.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2015 17:08
|
|
|
Wouldn't be the first time someone looked at their referrer logs on flickr and started interacting with goons. Didn't the last thread of this nature have someone sign up and get into a slapfight?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2015 17:53
|
|
|
The really sad part is how reddit stumbled over itself debating whether the subject even needed photoshopping. And so a bunch of internet nerds scoured the internet looking for an alternate picture to confirm whether or not she is sufficiently attractive.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2015 22:38
|
|
|
akadajet posted:There's no way to use the clarity slider tastefully. Yes there is, just never take it higher than 10.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2015 05:11
|
|
|
Dude needs to be kicked in the shins just for pretending he doesn't know HDR. "LOL that's straight out of the camera guys, that's just nature for you!!!" 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 24, 2015 21:01
|
|
|
50 megapickles, still comes out fuzzy. Guess they should have bought a lens with a higher quality focusing ring.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 20, 2016 20:44
|
|
|
Geektox posted:I've seen Max Gor's likes on just completely random photos I've found in random groups so there's no way he's not using some kind of script, does that kinda poo poo actually work? And why?? It was discussed around here recently, might have been in this thread even. Basically it's a social network, and links work. You fire off a bot that randomly likes new photos, maybe that photo creator will wonder who you are, and click on your name. Boom your pictures get more views, which is the epeen currency of flickr.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 6, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
A rare case where the responses are better than the original post. A little predictable, but amusing.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 8, 2016 18:57
|
|
|
Too bad the error is operator error. He was probably sprinting to the clusterfuck of humanity while taking pictures. I mean yeah the iphone has glacial focus speed but if you just stand still for a second it'll do a better job than that.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 8, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
Just imagine how long she practiced that in front of a mirror to make sure she got the same look every single time. A true professional! Used to hawk lovely fast food.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 17:05
|
|
|
In a world without shadows, only one man was brave enough to document it.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 30, 2016 21:42
|
|
|
Anyone who accepts such a commission should have their computer ground into a paste and poured down their throat.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 2, 2016 03:00
|
|
|
That's a bit creepy, album after album of completely worthless vacation photos.. then suddenly, TITS!! Though I guess chronologically he starts with nudes then moved onto completely worthless vacation photos, but that's not how flickr orders things. It's almost a timeline of the guy going from young and desirable to an old fat gently caress that ladies don't want to expose themselves to anymore.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 14:49
|
|
|
Apparently SimCity 6 has a lot of work left before it's ready.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2016 20:46
|
|
|
Was nervous about clicking, thinking it might be one of those people that marry their car. I still regret clicking, but only because the pictures were so bad.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2016 03:06
|
|
|
Especially when the gear is designed to only function with one brand and it commonly costs thousands of dollars.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2016 19:14
|
|
|
The best part by far is his off center avatar, the world's derpiest voyeur.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2016 20:46
|
|
|
 - Nice pics you got in here.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
I really wish SLRs had a feature where it could detect that it was taking a picture of a mirror with the user making a deep and emotional expression, then detonate the battery on the spot.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 29, 2016 18:09
|
|
|
Soopafly posted:Most of those humans, babies included, look like they want to be put out of their misery. Pretty sure the baby is already dead.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 04:37
|
|
|
Stacked exposures of a moving subject is certainly a new one.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
flickr is pretty unique for the internet, you can be obsessed over any obscure thing and it's a guarantee there's someone else out there posting pictures with the same obsession. The really unique bit though is that these all co-exist without ever really encountering each other so you don't even get the raging flamewars that pop up on places like facebook or youtube.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 26, 2016 15:58
|
|
|
I think the point is it's not the subject that matters, it's the execution. At least the goon gas station squad put effort into a pleasant exposure, unlike mr bus that leaves his camera on auto and uploads four thousand photos with absolutely zero growth between the first image and the newest one.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 26, 2016 22:50
|
|
|
Gotta love a group with 8500 members and zero photos. Been waiting for years with a box of kleenex and not getting any fulfillment.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 26, 2016 23:41
|
|
|
It's been HDR'd and every single person in there is in an unflattering pose. Should have been rejected on the first pass through the import.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 27, 2016 19:33
|
|
|
That baby's eyes pleading for someone to kill her and end the torture.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
Claims "the object of interest is in astonishing sharpness" and uploads a bunch of small jpegs with fuzzy subjects.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2016 14:41
|
|
|
I didn't need a watermark to convince me not to steal them. I think his camera is physically incapable of getting a face in focus.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2016 17:43
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 18:26 |
|
|
Based on some of the other pictures in that album he should have given up that fight about 10 years ago because drat dude, babies come out of the womb with more fuzz than that. Every single one of those photos belongs in this thread too. How desperate would you have to be to pay for garbage like that?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2016 19:41
|
|