Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Grey Area
Sep 9, 2000
Battle Without Honor or Humanity

Amused to Death posted:

It's probably mostly this, combined with a bit of modern living. People in theory want more kids, but it just keeps being put off since people can now effectively put it off.
It's also about much higher expectations of what a "normal" life style is than people had in the past and changing family structures. People now expect to (and are expected to by their employers and their peers)

* have full-time out-of-the-home jobs (which often involve well over 40 hours/week)
* have a big house of their own in the suburbs at great expense in both time (commuting) and money
* have lots of time for individual recreation
* have retirement time which they spend on individual pursuits rather than taking care of their grandkids
* spend lavishly on each kid in terms of time, space, education and recreation

There is not enough time for more than one or two kids in the lavish and individualstic lifestyle that is presented as normal in modern society. Government subsidies for daycare and education only goes part way to reducing these pressures on families, as shown by the fact that rich people do not tend to have larger families than lower-income families.

I'm not saying these developments toward liberal individualism are bad, but they do explain why women are choosing to have fewer kids.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread