|
Mahoning posted:The Big XII should be punished for being a bunch of idiots. You can't really disagree with that opinion. They're doing it exactly like everyone else has done it for the entire history of college football pre-1994
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:24 |
|
|
# ? Apr 23, 2024 14:49 |
|
Jim McElwain's press conference was the best chaos of the weekend Clara-A-Belle for Heisman, long live the Human Society Offense
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:25 |
|
Chiken n' Waffles posted:The more he campaigns the worse it is. You really don't want to hammer home the point that your conference doesn't have its poo poo together (One TRUE Champion!... lol j/k) and that any decision the committee makes is going to be wrong (which it will be inherently). big 12 is getting left out, time to get bowlsby and everyone else in the big 12 fired so we can have a well perceived conference next year even though we're the best in the nation already
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:26 |
|
I like TCU better just cause I watched a TCU game this season and have an affinity for purple. But there seems to be no TCU fans here and a lot of Baylor fans so maybe I like Baylor better.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:26 |
|
anne frank fanfic posted:briles just talked about that in the conference hopefully big 12 just makes it one champion through tiebreakers and keeps the round robin cause i love it Link to video? Video of all post games from today plz
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:27 |
|
Rabid Snake posted:I can't believe you're rooting for Oregon as a WSU fan. Why not? My impression has always been that WSU and Oregon have like the lowest hostility level of any of the NW schools because they're not in-state rivals and have no contentious history (because both have been poo poo historically). Plus Oregon has stomped on UW for a decade now, and hating the Huskies with a passion is something WSU and Oregon fans can come together in agreement about. It just comes down to where you fall on conference/regional solidarity vs. regional/conference hate. Speaking for myself I always root for WSU and Oregon State as long as it doesn't disadvantage Oregon. gently caress the smug, perfidious Huskies forever though (1949 Rose Bowl betrayal never forget). LGD fucked around with this message at 07:29 on Dec 7, 2014 |
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:27 |
|
All this because TCU was loving obsessed with fade routes in the 4th quarter against Baylor
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:27 |
|
pillsburysoldier posted:Link to video? http://stationcaster.com/stations/krzi/media/mp3/Art_Briles_Post_Game_12_6_14-1417929867.mp3 no video yet
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:28 |
|
They are totally going to seed these teams to get Oregon-Ohio State Rose Bowl and Bama-FSU Sugar Bowl.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:30 |
|
Frackie Robinson posted:They're doing it exactly like everyone else has done it for the entire history of college football pre-1994 Pre-1994 TCU and Baylor wouldn't even be considered, so I don't see your point.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:30 |
|
Mahoning posted:Pre-1994 TCU and Baylor wouldn't even be considered, so I don't see your point. TCU (co-)won the SWC in 1994.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:32 |
|
MAO TSE-TUNGACUNT posted:TCU (co-)won the SWC in 1994. Bring back the SWC.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:32 |
|
FuzzySkinner posted:Bring back the SWC. agreedo ironically, TCU and Baylor and Tech split the SWC football conference title in 1994
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:33 |
|
http://www.ourdailybears.com/baylor-bears-2014-football-season/2014/12/7/7347123/art-briles-post-game-press-conference-video found the vid
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:34 |
|
MAO TSE-TUNGACUNT posted:TCU (co-)won the SWC in 1994. And wasn't even in the top 25, what's your point?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:36 |
|
Lasagna Pilot posted:They are totally going to seed these teams to get Oregon-Ohio State Rose Bowl and Bama-FSU Sugar Bowl. It wouldn't be that surprising. FSU was ranked #4 already so all you'd have to do is swap out TCU for tOSU and call it a day.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:37 |
|
MAO TSE-TUNGACUNT posted:agreedo Oh man. The year a horrendously outmatched TTU team played a very, very good USC team in the Cotton Bowl because it was our turn to go.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:38 |
|
Pattycakes posted:It wouldn't be that surprising. FSU was ranked #4 already so all you'd have to do is swap out TCU for tOSU and call it a day. I am pretty sure FSU was only #4 because Bama was #1. If Oregon moves to #1, FSU will be #3. But I don't think Bama is moving.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:39 |
|
Mahoning posted:And wasn't even in the top 25, what's your point? That a conference championship isn't really the be-all, end-all so you harping on it is kind of dumb.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:39 |
|
MAO TSE-TUNGACUNT posted:That a conference championship isn't really the be-all, end-all so you harping on it is kind of dumb. You comparing it to a year where an entire conference was irrelevant is a terrible way to make your point. Also, lol how did you make that point by comparing a year where TCU were co champs with Baylor to a year where TCU was co champs with Baylor. In neither year were either team deserving of a national title. Mahoning fucked around with this message at 07:46 on Dec 7, 2014 |
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:44 |
|
I love that Georgia Tech scored that last TD just so that FSU lost against the spread again. I would have made quite a bit of money betting against FSU all year like I would have if I knew a bookie.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:46 |
|
Baylor convincingly beat a far better team than Ohio State did tonight. There is no remotely sane argument that Ohio State has a better resume than either TCU or Baylor. Also TCU was #3 at the beginning of the day but apparently winning a game by 50 points gets you dropped 2-3 spots.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 07:58 |
|
Thermos H Christ posted:Baylor convincingly beat a far better team than Ohio State did tonight. There is no remotely sane argument that Ohio State has a better resume than either TCU or Baylor. Also TCU was #3 at the beginning of the day but apparently winning a game by 50 points gets you dropped 2-3 spots. If the team at the other end of the argument beat a far far far better team by an even bigger margin, then you could see how the argument becomes a bit more complicated.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:00 |
|
Mahoning posted:If the team at the other end of the argument beat a far far far better team by an even bigger margin, then you could see how the argument becomes a bit more complicated. Could you be slightly more specific?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:01 |
|
Thermos H Christ posted:Could you be slightly more specific? Ok......ummmmm Wisconsin is miles and miles and miles better than Iowa State. Ohio State beat them even worse than TCU beat a bottom feeder team.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:04 |
|
Mahoning posted:Ok......ummmmm Wisconsin is miles and miles and miles better than Iowa State. Ohio State beat them even worse than TCU beat a bottom feeder team. So what you're saying is that Baylor is better than both
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:04 |
|
Ok, so explain Ohio State losing to a bad, bad .500 Virginia Tech team and TCU losing on the road by 3 points to you know, the other team in this whole debate? Heading into this week TCU had the #45 SOS and Ohio State had the #54 SOS so it isn't that. Edit: Not to mention TCU beat Minnesota 30-7 and Ohio State squeaked by them 31-24 so it isn't even that!
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:06 |
|
Thermos H Christ posted:Baylor convincingly beat a far better team than Ohio State did tonight. There is no remotely sane argument that Ohio State has a better resume than either TCU or Baylor. Also TCU was #3 at the beginning of the day but apparently winning a game by 50 points gets you dropped 2-3 spots. Kansas state is laughably overrated. The difference between them and Wisconsin is negligible at best.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:08 |
|
Kirios posted:Ok, so explain Ohio State losing to a bad, bad .500 Virginia Tech team and TCU losing on the road by 3 points to you know, the other team in this whole debate? Both TCU and Baylor played 2 less FBS teams than OSU.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:08 |
|
Mahoning posted:Both TCU and Baylor played 2 less FBS teams than OSU. Are you seriously going to imply that tOSU should get significantly more credit for playing Kent State OOC than TCU/Baylor does for an FCS cupcake?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:09 |
|
Mahoning posted:Both TCU and Baylor played 2 less FBS teams than OSU. And yet both have the higher Strength of Schedule! That's certainly...odd, isn't it Mahoning? Edit: TCU does, Baylor does not. Still, playing a FBS team yet having a higher Strength of Schedule is incredibly damning for Ohio State. Edit 2: Ohio State's out of conference: 6-5 Navy 6-6 Virginia Tech 2-9 Kent State (Who *LOST* to a FBS team) 9-3 Cincinnati in the American Conference Am I...supposed to be impressed by this? Kirios fucked around with this message at 08:14 on Dec 7, 2014 |
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:10 |
|
sportsgenius86 posted:Kansas state is laughably overrated. Wisconsin lost to Northwestern and LSU, a bad team and a mediocre team. They're bad. Kansas State is much better.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:10 |
|
My lovely conference is better than your lovely conference for these reasons that I've carefully put together to help make my opinion seem factually correct. Please ignore any information that may disprove my opinions. This message was paid for by The Big 12 Conference. 10 Teams, 1 True Champion(s)
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:12 |
|
Spiritus Nox posted:Are you seriously going to imply that tOSU should get significantly more credit for playing Kent State OOC than TCU/Baylor does for an FCS cupcake? Ummmm, yes, because I'm an actual fan of college football that understands the gigantic drop off in talent between even the worst FBS team and the garbage FCS teams that TCU and Baylor played.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:12 |
|
Thermos H Christ posted:Baylor convincingly beat a far better team than Ohio State did tonight. There is no remotely sane argument that Ohio State has a better resume than either TCU or Baylor. Also TCU was #3 at the beginning of the day but apparently winning a game by 50 points gets you dropped 2-3 spots. Yea there is. You use unadjusted W/L SOS which will give you Ohio State as having a stronger SOS than TCU and Baylor, which is what I think they are doing. Then from there you discount the VT loss as a special circumstances loss that is not indicative of the team Ohio State has grown to be, and count Michigan State as one of the best wins of the season. The trick is using "ranked wins" and unadjusted W/L SOS, by those metrics wins over Wisconsin and Michigan State are better than wins over LSU and Mississippi State, for example.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:12 |
|
Kirios posted:Ok, so explain Ohio State losing to a bad, bad .500 Virginia Tech team and TCU losing on the road by 3 points to you know, the other team in this whole debate? And according to ESPN, Ohio State's sos is now 45th while TCU and Baylors are 54th and 59th or something.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:13 |
|
TCU and Baylor don't have great resumes either. Historically, especially; and this season.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:13 |
|
gently caress it, just make them play round-robin play-in games
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:14 |
|
eBay Huckster posted:gently caress it, just make them play round-robin play-in games I'd be 100% down with this.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:14 |
|
|
# ? Apr 23, 2024 14:49 |
|
Everyone should just play round robins and then pretend Oklahoma is a good team. Problem solved.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2014 08:15 |