|
buttcrackmenace posted:add in a personalized font button at the top of the main page with different options, but they actually all just log you out and close the browser window / tab add in personalized fonts but charge money for them. $10 for a new font $5 to change someone else's font
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 16:19 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 01:27 |
|
Al Cowens posted:You can't cut back on fonts! You will regret this! ANGRY ABOUT ROBOTO!
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 16:19 |
|
Cicadas! posted:I am angry.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 16:20 |
|
i like whatever im seeing now because it's nice and thin. 1024x768 supremacy
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 16:20 |
|
I'm so confused. All this font switching makes me feel like I need an eye exam.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 16:24 |
|
Nostratic posted:I'm so confused.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 16:25 |
|
Lowtax posted:There are many reasons to use chrome. Extension support. Better web rendering. Easy portability between Android devices. It is the superior browsing solution and I stand by this assessment! Chrome's also great because of extensions like SomethingAwful Fixes. I'm sorry, but someone has to be that guy who hates change. Might as well be me.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 16:26 |
|
Last Chance posted:I'm sorry, but someone has to be that guy who hates change.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 16:27 |
|
Yeah, we've been doing great so far.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 16:34 |
|
hellow op i am posting from chromium the free and open source browser from inside of linux mint and i do not like these changes.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 16:36 |
|
shoutouts to being on mobile and having everything be one font
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 16:37 |
|
Op these fonts/Typefacae are all well and good, but have you considered joining the serif master race?
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 16:49 |
|
Better now, but a bit too thin and tiny.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:01 |
|
I had to google how to refresh the cache on a mac because ctrl+F5 doesn't work and neither did any combination of stuff+F5
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:04 |
|
I'm on freebsd with w3m and this font sucks arrrse! EDIT: Ahoy!
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:08 |
|
This font is actually neat although it does scream web 2.0
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:09 |
|
Idiot Kicker posted:This font is actually neat although it does scream web 2.0
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:10 |
|
Lowtax posted:What does "web 2.0" mean and what aspects of the font make it appear to be a part of that? Did you see "Soylent Green"?
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:11 |
|
Lowtax posted:What does "web 2.0" mean and what aspects of the font make it appear to be a part of that? http://www.mongodb.org/ http://libcinder.org/ Compare design cues, overall aesthetic
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:13 |
|
Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans Comic Sans
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:13 |
|
Al Cowens posted:http://nodejs.org/ Also know as: Gay.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:14 |
|
Wingding Wednesday Wingding Wednesday Wingding Wednesday Wingding Wednesday Wingding Wednesday Wingding Wednesday Wingding Wednesday Wingding Wednesday Wingding Wednesday
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:14 |
|
Change all the fonts all the time
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:15 |
|
There's something nautical about Roboto Sans. My lungs are filling with fluid as we speak!
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:16 |
|
gnarlyhotep posted:Change all the fonts all the time Change the font every week. Typeface Tuesdays. Wingdings must be part of the rotation
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:24 |
|
Lowtax posted:What does "web 2.0" mean and what aspects of the font make it appear to be a part of that? It's clean and corporate and you'd expect to see it on tech company commercials with the ukelele in the background and the product name is in lowercase but it's a nice neutral font so w/e
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:27 |
|
Yeah this is actually a lot more readable than Open Sans IMO. Even if it does look like an anorexic Impact. ...change the font to Impact
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:46 |
|
is ~ still broken? edit: nope! it was before.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 17:53 |
|
Somewhat serious post. I like Arial or anything that comes closest to it. It is what we use at work. Specifically for ADA reasons. Supposed to be easiest to read for anyone with vision problems. We do everything in Arial 12. I'm not an expert like some folks here. Just suggesting what we use.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 18:09 |
|
domo arigato for the roboto keep changing the fonts, all the time i wanna see a different font like every time i log on
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 18:10 |
|
can we at least get user names in papyrus?
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 18:36 |
|
Spanish Manlove posted:Wingding Wednesday Franklin Gothic Fridays Terminal Thursdays Lowtax posted:It's Roboto now, that is the font that will kill this website! Also, it's amazing how much discussion changing the font to a slightly different take on a Sans typeface will generate. I think you could change the square pictures that buttress the ads to hardcore gay porn and it would generate less posts in QCS. Crazy Ted fucked around with this message at 19:29 on Dec 15, 2014 |
# ? Dec 15, 2014 19:10 |
|
Have you considered Museo Sans 500/700? It looks readable.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 19:30 |
|
Change it to that Olde English font that's all fancy looking Edit: Also Wingding Wednesday
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 19:36 |
|
What type of Droid does this font represent please? I look forward to a prompt response.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 19:45 |
|
Just unzipped and installed a pack of 1000 psychotic squiggly hand-drwan fonts so I'm ready for the fontageddon.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 19:47 |
|
exspurt analcyst posted:Just unzipped and installed a pack of 1000 psychotic squiggly hand-drwan fonts so I'm ready for the fontageddon. Read that cartoon characters top as 'Trany'
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 19:49 |
|
Lobster. Join the rest of the
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 19:53 |
|
still waiting for comic sans everywhere
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 20:27 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 01:27 |
|
is there a font called Sans Sans
|
# ? Dec 15, 2014 20:31 |