|
The Sphinxster posted:As is Romney. Pretty much all Mormons are conservative so Romney is a lot better off than Rick is, Romney's problem is he is a very poorly programmed protocol droid.
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 00:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 00:36 |
|
|
The Sphinxster posted:Elderly bigots dominated the elections no one cares about? Shocked I am. your av is a p cool dog pic where is it from?
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 03:58
|
|
|
Now that Rob Portman is out, there's nothing keeping Mitch Daniels from going all the way. Nah, seriously, I see Scott Walker getting the nom.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:31
|
|
|
it's going to be christie v. clinton and clinton will win and be like obama but more neoliberal and with more drones. meanwhile the world will continue its implacable slide towards ruin, the seas will rise and the deserts will spread. eventually socialism will save us.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:35
|
|
|
It's going to be Jeb Bush. He has a lock on Florida donors, California donors, Texas donors even if Perry enters, and probably New York and Wall Street money as well. It's going to be Jeb Bush as president. Get over it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:35
|
|
|
Plafop posted:It's going to be Jeb Bush. He has a lock on Florida donors, California donors, Texas donors even if Perry enters, and probably New York and Wall Street money as well. It's going to be Jeb Bush as president. Get over it. you're really dumb
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:37
|
|
|
Although really the Illuminati will be fine with either Bush or Clinton. If the impossible happened and it looked like an outsider like Paul or Cruz could win expect an embarrassing scandal to miraculously be discovered.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:37
|
|
|
End Of Worlds posted:you're really dumb Can't get over it yet, huh? Well don't worry, you still have two years of hyperventilating to get out of the way before Bush is sworn in to office.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:40
|
|
|
bush III is not in any way happening homedog. christie is legit the only conservative candidate with enough positive national name recognition to take a shot at it. and lol if you think jebby would pull down "new york and wall street" money before christie would. edit wait you're the dude who was bemoaning the idea that the american political parties are at two opposite ends of a wide spectrum instead of two vaguely different shades of the right wing so lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:40
|
|
|
david brooks thinks jeb will win the nomination, and you know what they say - as brooks goes, so goes the nation
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:40
|
|
|
imo jeb is plausible and isnt as scandal ridden as christie. jeb comes across as more serious and since elections are just a pr campaign thats half the battle
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:41
|
|
|
hillary clinton will win the presidential election in the tyool 2016 your choices will be between "neoliberal warmonger" and "neoliberal warmonger with slightly more affection towards the prison industrial complex" and the first one will win nothing will change and your idiot country will slide into the sea
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:43
|
|
|
im going to vote for obama again
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:43
|
|
|
Someone mentioned him being portrayed as the "smart" Bush, and I think that's what they will try to do. They will probably try to compare him to his father more than his brother. He will siphon off a lot of latino voters in the general as well, because he is more moderate on immigration. And most importantly of all he will have the majority of Bilderberg support when they meet and sacrifice a child to Moloch.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:45
|
|
|
End Of Worlds posted:hillary clinton will win the presidential election in the tyool 2016 Three terms of the same party doesn't happen anymore in the modern political era. Everyone loved Clinton and they chose W over Gore. Sorry for your lots.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:46
|
|
|
Plafop posted:And most importantly of all he will have the majority of Bilderberg support when they meet and sacrifice a child to Moloch. this is the only thing youve said so far that isnt wrong Plafop posted:Three terms of the same party doesn't happen anymore in the modern political era. Everyone loved Clinton and they chose W over Gore. Sorry for your lots. dude reagan -> bush I. gore v. bush II is a hell of a cockup to base an entire political generalization on. edIt: literally out of the last three non-incumbent elections, the ruling party won one and very nearly won another. did win the other if we're going by the popular vote. this is not an assertion that the evidence supports. chernobyl kinsman fucked around with this message at 18:51 on Dec 20, 2014 |
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:47
|
|
|
Alexzandvar posted:Most Catholics vote democrat statistically and are more likely to believe in things like evolution and the big bang.. well they fuckin should beleive in those things because theyre accepted as part of God's Whatever by the church
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:48
|
|
|
End Of Worlds posted:this is the only thing youve said so far that isnt wrong Reagan was extremely popular. Everyone thinks Obama is an incompetent gently caress up, because he is.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:51
|
|
|
galileo didnt get poo poo on for proposing heliocentrism, he got poo poo on for writing a tract for the pope where a character named "Retard" repeats all the questions the pope had recently asked galileo
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:51
|
|
|
Plafop posted:Reagan was extremely popular. Everyone thinks Obama is an incompetent gently caress up, because he is. obama would have to accidentally nuke no fewer than three (3) US cities before anyone non-white and/or non-male and/or under the age of 65 votes for someone with "bush" in his name again that's the problem here dog. the right has lost the demographic battle and that's not a situation that's going to improve for them. it's actually getting worse because you're being outbred by the browns. repubs swept the midterms, of course, because that's historically not an election that anyone under the age of 65 gives enough of a poo poo about to vote in. presidential elections are different there. repubs swept the midterms in 2010, too, and obama murdered mccain in 2012 for exactly the same reason.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:54
|
|
|
We don't need another loving Bush in office God loving damnit, Jeb Bush, that sounds like a red neck podunk pud pulling cockamamie cousin loving dickweed.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:55
|
|
|
im sorry but not even the most insufferable of college conservatives is gonna get fired up about someone named jeb
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:56
|
|
|
End Of Worlds posted:obama would have to accidentally nuke no fewer than three (3) US cities before anyone non-white and/or non-male and/or under the age of 65 votes for someone with "bush" in his name again W has a higher popularity right now than Obama. America on average is answering the question "Miss me yet?" with an unironic "yes"
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:56
|
|
|
Plafop posted:W has a higher popularity right now than Obama. America on average is answering the question "Miss me yet?" with an unironic "yes" im not disagreeing but im sorry man no one besides white male baby boomers is voting for republicans anymore. that isn't going to change because obama blows.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:59
|
|
|
 pictured: the president america deserves
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 18:59
|
|
|
End Of Worlds posted:im not disagreeing but im sorry man no one besides white male baby boomers is voting for republicans anymore. that isn't going to change because obama blows. You just said Obama would have to nuke cities before people would vote for Bush. But he's already, right now, less popular than that guy everyone supposedly hates so much. I think in two years time voters will be looking back on even the W years with nostalgia. And when they think of Hillary they won't think of the good times with Bill, they'll think of what she did in her time under Obama. Republicans will win big.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 19:02
|
|
|
We don't need a Kerbal in the White House
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 19:02
|
|
|
Plafop posted:You just said Obama would have to nuke cities before people would vote for Bush. But he's already, right now, less popular than that guy everyone supposedly hates so much. I think in two years time voters will be looking back on even the W years with nostalgia. And when they think of Hillary they won't think of the good times with Bill, they'll think of what she did in her time under Obama. Plafop posted:I'm really loving tired of both parties. It's too bad there are no practical moderates left in either party, everyone just plays to their base and resides at the extremes of the spectrum. haha okay man. you got any other searingly cogent analyses you wanna apply your phd in poli sci to or is that it
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 19:04
|
|
|
Like I said, you have two years to try to deal with it. Hope you can do it man.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 19:08
|
|
|
wow i wonder why this one dude's approval ratings have been rising after six years of not having to do anything at all. surely this is a meaningful data point.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 19:11
|
|
|
having watched anywhere up to four different documentaries set in the US and therefore being more informed than the average US voter, I can confirm that both sides will elect poo poo candidates that barely disagree on anything and then the Republican will win because a) it's now their turn and b) because all of the leftists that Obama made empty promises to will go back to voting for either Nader or neo-Nader while all of the disillusioned right-wingers will continue to vote for who they're told to because they're easily persuaded and reliant on authority figures
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 19:16
|
|
|
The next president will be a woman. Why is anyone even arguing that a man has a chance?
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 19:55
|
|
|
lol that demographic stuff means that if the democrats lose even a tiny percentage of the black or mexican vote (they recently lose big among mexicans and asians in TX), their dead dead dead so they can win in only a few places as it is, having lost the white vote forever, and losing any of the minority vote is the end of days for them. the race baiting should be super extreme this next election & i'm pumped
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 19:57
|
|
|
Plafop posted:And most importantly of all he will have the majority of Bilderberg support when they meet and sacrifice a child to Moloch. lmao
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 20:08
|
|
|
what if the establishment held an election...... and no one showed up?? boycott the election 2016 lowest voter turnout in history, we can f*cking do it
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 20:11
|
|
sexy young infidel posted:lol that demographic stuff means that if the democrats lose even a tiny percentage of the black or mexican vote (they recently lose big among mexicans and asians in TX), their dead dead dead That should be cool because the republicans are doing everything they can to be major fuckers to blacks and mexicans. They're caught in a hard place. If they compromise with the blacks and mexicans they won't get the white turn out. If they keep being bigots they won't get any minority vote. Also, they seem to think that having a cuban is relatable for mexican and south american immigrants and act confused when brown people don't like another brown person.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 20:11
|
|
|
im voting for whoever isn't white kill whitey
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 20:11
|
|
TEAYCHES posted:what if the establishment held an election...... and no one showed up?? no i'm voting warren and she will be the next president of the united states of america.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 20:12
|
|
|
MegaGatts posted:no i'm voting warren and she will be the next president of the united states of america. I too will be voting for Obama's third term.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 20:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 00:36 |
|
Plafop posted:I too will be voting for Obama's third term. that would be Hillary, it's really cool to be a cynic and hope for a revolution you're doing nothing to help instead of voting
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2014 20:21
|
|