|
I played UT back then. I dunno what the gently caress you're talking about.
|
#
¿
Dec 30, 2014 02:28
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 23:17 |
|
|
That's why I play shootcop now, duh (also that was meant to be a signup)
|
|
#
¿
Dec 30, 2014 04:59
|
|
|
nor I
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2014 05:00
|
|
|
I don't even understand how the cheats work in these sorts of games, because I've never done it. It just seems like magic. Whoops, shot in the head. Respawn. Whoops, shot in the head. Respawn. Basically, it's exactly what happens to me in TF2, only possibly more frustrating since people are way bigger assholes in more "serious" games.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2014 20:41
|
|
|
the gun you take to shoot yourself if you play counterstrike
|
|
#
¿
Jan 1, 2015 21:04
|
|
|
##bet ct all I don't actually own CSGO. Is that legit going to be a problem?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 3, 2015 02:50
|
|
|
Dr. Hurt posted:the most dangerous game ...candyland?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 3, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
go and chess make my brain hurt partly from the game partly from the insufferable smugness of those who play and look down upon people who don't If we can't blast the stereo while we play and I can't shittalk my opponents, it's not worth playing. same goes for golf and tennis
|
|
#
¿
Jan 3, 2015 22:01
|
|
|
oh god I figured it out CS:GO this isn't counterstrike mafia it's chess:go mafia gently caress this is gonna suck
|
|
#
¿
Jan 3, 2015 22:02
|
|
|
uranus posted:oh, are we playing mafia now? tbf, my bashing was not driveby if you had seen the poo poo I was saying in mafia skype chat my bashing is continual because chess and go are games where I am a loving bad and people who are not bads inevitably end up giving me poo poo about it (in before "allen wren cares too much about what his posts look like which is so scummy" AGAIN for like the fourth game in a row)
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2015 11:16
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:The main vote leaders have been Winged Orpheus and Chic Trombone. You should read them if nothing else. I'm suspicious of FV and to a lesser extent KFC for reasons outlined above and I'd suggest reading them. I'm not seeing either the WO or CT argument. Which means if there's anyone I need to read, it's this guy
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2015 19:58
|
|
|
and somber pushes fv after fv criticises the ct push curiouser
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2015 20:00
|
|
|
yeah I read fv's post. I don't think it's as big a deal as you're making it out to be rarity's case seems solid though
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2015 20:16
|
|
|
as solid as anything can be while we're playing chess.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2015 20:17
|
|
|
jesus christ stop crawling up my rear end chill also i'm typing with a wrist brace on so gimme a goddman minute
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2015 20:29
|
|
|
This is not at all rhetorical, can you explain the following for me? what the gently caress does 'this is not at all rhetorical' mean speak english If you agree that the points against KFC are good, what do you think of FV saying that Rarity's case on him is 'lazy' and too 'by the book'? wait i thought fv was talking about the ct case fml Why is voting someone based on a 'by the book' case a bad idea? because shut up no seriously it's because there is gently caress all for content and basically we're still at the point where people are throwing poo poo at the wall and overreacting to it so there is no such thing as a by the book case at this point and so acting like there is one is scummy Is the case on Chic Trombone bad as in wrong, or bad as in scummy? Can you explain the thought behind your answer? FV seems to think it is both and hasn't explained why. what's the difference what you want me to read fv's mind? gently caress if I know
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2015 20:36
|
|
|
uranus posted:allen are you mad Allen Wren posted:I continue to be amazed at how people read what I post as being mad or having flipped out.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2015 21:08
|
|
|
uranus posted:if you want to not sound mad, i suggest not using mad sounding words like 'gently caress' and italics make you look like youre yelling, not whispering I'm not yelling, I'm just making sure you can hear me this is how I always sound though to be fair, I don't think you've ever seen me play before? also the painkillers kicked in, so the brace is off and I can use my shift key if I feel like it so I'll have something like actual analysis never after lunch
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2015 21:40
|
|
|
basically I don't feel the onus is on me to not say gently caress so that I look more town or less mad or whatever I mean what kind of fuckin' bullshit is that
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2015 21:43
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:You would look less scummy if you stopped freaking out and actually read the last couple pages. man have you ever seen freaking out this is not it
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2015 22:11
|
|
|
also I said after lunch my eggs are almost done boiling
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2015 22:11
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm rereading. I had a really good "Somber, you're being a shitler" post drafted up, but I'm coming around on it. So this is like four or five levels of arguing WO looks pretty bad. So Ernie and Kumba give it a go. I'm not sure whether I can call Ernie or Kumba's moves bad or not. They're just "wow, that's a lovely play, have a vote" things. But when you comment on a comment, that's analysis. KFC looks real bad in this series of posts, yeah. He jumps on the E/K voting bloc, but here's what I'm seeing that I wasn't previously: I'm not sure if KFC is taking the path of least resistance, like, "hey, that looks like a reasonable move day one, those seem like pretty good moves to keep town alive" or if he's going "hey there's a townie, maybe we can start running a lynch." I'm actually inclined to think it's the former, contrary to the third-vote-is-always-scum theory. CT posts as well in what's being called the coaching post. I don't see how it's a scum maneuver. Literally don't. I guess you could say that calling out a scumbuddy's bad post is a way to achieve separation, but if anything it immediately makes other players consider the relationship between the coach and the coached. Especially this early on, I'd imagine the proper scum move would just to act like that post never happened. So Rarity calls the KFC post bad analysis, which is true and votes KFC. I'm okay with this. I dunno if I'd make that move, but I don't instantly think Rarity's move is scummy. That's the thing---just because you're not sure of a move doesn't mean then we also have somber's look at CT but after hashing it out somber kinda pulls off of it. okay. nothing going on there. so the crux of the thing here is the fv argument and fv's main thrust is that rarity's look at kfc is bad play I can see that. there are definitely enough players (especially this early) who are doing what'd be considered "bad play" that making a call on them is, in and of itself, bad play. but I guess that's just day one for you? However Somberbrero posted:You would look less scummy if you stopped freaking out and actually read the last couple pages. Don't make this about me like you haven't seen me in other games and want to make me look like this isn't my standard poo poo in front of a bunch of people who've never got the patented wren-talking-poo poo method before.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2015 00:38
|
|
|
Allen Wren posted:So Rarity calls the KFC post bad analysis, which is true and votes KFC. I'm okay with this. I dunno if I'd make that move, but I don't instantly think Rarity's move is scummy. That's the thing---just because you're not sure of a move doesn't mean So I forgot to finish my thought So Rarity calls the KFC post bad analysis, which is true and votes KFC. I'm okay with this. I dunno if I'd make that move, but I don't instantly think Rarity's move is scummy. That's the thing---just because you're not sure of a move doesn't mean it's automatically a scummy move that's what I'm saying like person A can think person D is scum and person B can think person C is scum and they can both be right, both be wrong, etc. It's just not instantly a one or the other proposition
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2015 00:43
|
|
|
gently caress that was way too much effort and reading back to shitposting
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2015 00:44
|
|
|
Jeez, nine or ten short? Large games are a goddamn mess also hello thread I slept poorly what else is new
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2015 19:26
|
|
|
I'm still not sold on the fv case myself. I know that'll look bad if it's a scum flip, but I just can't get on it----though the assertion that the vig was obtained via winning the chess game, ehhhhhhn I do have to reread quid that is a lot of words Dugong posted:what are you doing? are you a bomb? are you a fool? the latter
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2015 19:37
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:I feel like you're taking really innocuous posts from me (and YPM to some extent) and twisting them and rationalising reading them in the worst possible light to make them look scummy. see what you didn't wait for is after lunch I always talk poo poo before lunch and then actually read poo poo after lunch
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2015 21:00
|
|
|
didn't make lunch yet
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2015 21:00
|
|
|
poo poo I thought I was a bad player this is incredible still waiting on lunch
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
##vote uranus jesus loving christ, uranus is trying even less than I am. Literally the only thing the dude did is accuse quid of careposting
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2015 23:41
|
|
|
and piggyback on the fv discussion
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2015 23:41
|
|
|
Rarity posted:derp always does this, it's always really loving annoying Hm. noted. and, balls, we're really in a pickle if we're going to lynch anybody. okay, so our top votegetters right now are merk, somber and fv. Merk, I dunno. I've never played against the guy, and it feels like a lot of the arguments about him are meta-based. I'm willing to buy the argument that he just waxed opop to end the chess game. I am the worst chess player I've ever met and even I could see how done that poo poo was. Don't scum dayvigs usually flip immediately, though? That's what I want to know. Maybe when the loved condition was announced, that's when merk got the one-shot, if it was gotten from that win. I don't have enough to grip on there. I can't say somber's play doesn't feel like him, to me it looks exactly the same as previous. But him somehow forgetting how explosively bad of a player I am after seeing me in like two or three games last month and calling out my bog-standard lovely play as freaking out is hinky as gently caress. I keep going back and forth on fv. I need to give her a real reread, but, like, when you look at the last time I posted seriously, we're stuck arguing about the analysis of analysis of analysis of garbage posts, so it's difficult. At least with the somber thing I just mentioned it's straight up disingenuous analysis of a bad post. gimme a minute or twenty to reread fv but for now I'm pretty confident about changing over to ##vote Somberbrero in the meantime. also this map sucks can we get a vote going to change it?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuugh
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:##vote merk serious question - how does claiming vt make one not scummy? that's like not even claiming. (Feel free to totally John Madden it and talk about how good mafia is about finding the scums and defending the towns and that's what good football is if you like. bonus points for yellow telestrator arrows and circles)
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
...dr. hurt is here? could have fooled me
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:My streak of not getting killed n1 continues, I deserve a trophy 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2015 07:29
|
|
|
Chic Trombone posted:Also, I modded that game. Kind of hard for me not to have read a game when I modded it Holy poo poo wow. ##vote merk
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2015 01:05
|
|
|
I know that's a no-effort vote but basically I can't figure out what the gently caress merk is actually trying to achieve other than trying to go "stop talking about me!"
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2015 01:06
|
|
|
I dunno. I pulled the "go ahead vote me I'm VT VOTE ME" in my very first game out of annoyance and having had a bad week, it looks really lovely coming from someone who's supposedly king poo poo. I still don't see merk as town at all.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2015 23:54
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 23:17 |
|
|
Ugh. I'm starting to wonder if the scum are just letting us all hang each other, and they don't even have to post to let us do it. I'm not innocent of it, but there are so many people not saying anything at all. I'm not saying much of anything because I've got basically nothing to go on, and posting when you've got nothing to go on is basically just as bad as not posting when you've got nothing to go on. And of course this post will get read as both "wow, lots of words to say nothing" and "caring too much", while I could just not post and get read as "wow, so active day one but hiding now" and "completely doesn't care about following up their cases" This loving game.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2015 22:52
|
|