|
Habs/Lumbus Flyers/Caps Leafs/Ducks Jersey/Kings The rumours were false and Emelin is out there. This is worse than going to bed having seen the weather report calling for an assload of snow and being sure that school would be cancelled the next day, waking up and nnnnnope. e: Habs off to a fine start
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 11:46 |
|
|
I missed that goal. Can it be blamed on Emelin?
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:18
|
|
|
That looked like a pretty weak-rear end goal after a couple good scoring chances for the Habs. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
yellowcar posted:I missed that goal. Can it be blamed on Emelin? The rest of the team is clearly disheartened that he's still the lineup
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
 Connauton does a good thing. Is good again.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:20
|
|
|
Zybl0re posted:That looked like a pretty weak-rear end goal after a couple good scoring chances for the Habs. Well it was off Eller's stick but having the first shot on goal go in is kind of a drag
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:20
|
|
|
Jesus I barely get Gamecenter up and going only find Price is beaten on the first shot. Looks like that usual January team slump is already in full swing. It never seems to fail season after season, Good in October, acceptable in November, awesome in December, poo poo in January and if the trend follows good enough in February before tapering off towards the end of March to still get into a playoff spot albeit not necessarily with gusto.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:20
|
|
|
Bobs robbin' Patches.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
too much mans? e: nope
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:27
|
|
|
There'd better not be a loving TOO MUCH MANS there because Shelley's right. There were only four guys on the ice.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:27
|
|
|
Well I'm here late and there's already a goal in
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:28
|
|
|
Lumbus looks very strong right now. The Habs do not.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:34
|
|
|
Was Emelin on the ice just now, with the Habs hemmed into their zone?? Why yes it was!
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:35
|
|
|
Never seen a team which misses the net with its shots with as much regularity as the Jackets. gently caress you, Time Warner. I have dollar boxed, cable boxed, and analog TVs, and all I can watch this on tonight is the non-digital cable box channel which is cutting off half the graphics. 
CBJSprague24 fucked around with this message at 01:40 on Jan 15, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
Ok it's early days but I think this 'balanced lines' dealio Therrien is trying is, how can I put this, not working.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:40
|
|
|
That's not going to count.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:41
|
|
|
This is gonna be tight 
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:41
|
|
|
A goal???
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:41
|
|
|
Boy that's awwwwwwwwwwwfully close.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:41
|
|
|
That's a goal but they're not gonna call it. Because he didn't on the ice, I mean.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:41
|
|
|
I think the balance of probability is that the puck was in but you can't see it all the way across the line.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
Martytoof posted:That's a goal but they're not gonna call it. You, sir, are unfamiliar with the interactions between The War Room and The Columbus Blue Jackets.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
So close...but I want it to be in. e: It's in. e2: But they're not going to count it. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
I don't think that's a goal
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
yeeeesh that is close
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
The fakeout on the point to the net.  "I'm gonna call it a goaahhhhhhhh that's awfully close..." e- THE WAR ROOM MADE AN IFFY CALL IN FAVOR OF COLUMBUS 
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:43
|
|
|
booooooooo
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:44
|
|
|
boy oh boy that's about as close to a no goal as you can get.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:45
|
|
|
CBJSprague24 posted:The fakeout on the point to the net. It being Montreal is the X factor in this case. Don't get your hopes up too much CBJ buddy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:45
|
|
|
I thought that was going to be called a goal because I thought they'd give them a break on it being right on the line.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:46
|
|
|
Seeing the Habs possibly lose to Columbus will hopefully dull the pain from the rear end kicking the Leafs are going to get from the Ducks.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:46
|
|
|
.Spec posted:boy oh boy that's about as close to a no goal as you can get. Even on the super zoom cam you couldn't see any white between the puck and the line. I mean I'm pretty sure it flopped over as soon as Bob's pad hit it but they couldn't overturn the call with what they could see.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:47
|
|
|
evenworse username posted:Even on the super zoom cam you couldn't see any white between the puck and the line. I mean I'm pretty sure it flopped over as soon as Bob's pad hit it but they couldn't overturn the call with what they could see. Yeah I'm actually not too mad about this one considering the whole call on the ice onus rule. HBNRW posted:Seeing the Habs possibly lose to Columbus will hopefully dull the pain from the rear end kicking the Leafs are going to get from the Ducks. The Leafs will have on of those weird blow out games against a top tier team they are prone to having tonight. The Habs will lose to Columbus and obey the law of the January slump. Refer back to this passage latter.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
time to see this new fangled power play
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:49
|
|
|
And the Montreal power play goes to work. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:49
|
|
|
yellowcar posted:time to see this new fangled power play Oh man I can hardly wait for the offensive torrent. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
hmmmmmmmmmmmmm it's seems to be as bad as the other power plays
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
I really love the Jackets 3rd but every time i see them I'm wonder why the hell the white balance on my screen is all hosed up.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
Patches, I don't know if Carey's going to like that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 11:46 |
|
|
Well this is much better.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2015 01:51
|
|