Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
redshirt
Aug 11, 2007

Reporting for shovel mission Sir.

Vire posted:

It would be easier and cheaper to make a habitat under the ocean then on another planet. Mars has no radiation shield and the hydrogen would just fly off into space. Thats a pretty insurmountable challenge however don't worry we are never leaving this planet and we will all die here in the next thousand years when some idiot finally starts world war 3.

Jesus Christ I already told you!


No, Mars would not just up and lose a brand new atmosphere. It would take millions of years for a new atmosphere to blow away, years in which I assume the atmosphere is also being replenished.

Terraforming Mars could work, if anyone ever did it. Which is unlikely.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread