Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
gnarlyhotep
Sep 30, 2008

by Lowtax
Oven Wrangler

Waltzing Along posted:

Has this happened? Source?

sounds like common sense, because what legal recourse would the other participants have?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

gnarlyhotep
Sep 30, 2008

by Lowtax
Oven Wrangler

Waltzing Along posted:

If you have a whole office of people with copies of the tickets and the one who is holding them runs off, I am pretty sure they would have legal recourse.

yeah but only one ticket wins...maybe its a lord of the tickets situation

gnarlyhotep
Sep 30, 2008

by Lowtax
Oven Wrangler

EngineerSean posted:

The idea of getting into a pool is to give you a larger chance to win a smaller pot, and that has to do with the marginal utility of money. Technically if you buy 1 ticket for a $500 million jackpot or if you buy 1 share out of 100 shares of 100 tickets, your expected value is the same. In the latter scenario, you just have 100 chances to win $5 million. However, if you think that there's not going to be a ton of difference in your life if you won $5 million or $500 million (and I think that's a pretty fair assessment for most people), then you should of course take 100 chances to win $5 million rather than 1 chance to win $500 million.

This is also why the banker in Deal or No Deal always offered less than expected value for his deals (and because it made good television).

:eyepop:

  • Locked thread