Jesus H. Irrational Christ. Alright, so putting aside the author's supposed ignorance on logical issues (because I'm really not qualified on that), let me shout this question into the void: Why Harry Potter?! I mean, okay, magic and rationality. And it's popular and probably was popular whenever he started commiting this thing. But thinking of a ten-year-old (wizarding genius) just saying these things and thinking these things... ...It's wrong. I'd start organizing a lynch mob when he namedrops Feynman. By the time he's testing a hypothesis, the abomination should be well roasted and pitchforked to the nearest hanging tree. Tree promoted to use for redundant deaths. Whatever. It is not human. I'm following along to see just how much of my childhood this is going to retroactively ruin. edit: VVV I'm not throwing the plate away, I'm putting it behind a concrete wall with a very small bulletproof window and a canister of nerve gas at the ready, horrified and interested at the same time. I mean, let's face it, this is far from the worst that fanfiction has spawned - it's just the ridiculous pretense that comes packaged along with the usual terrible writing this time. Say one thing for fanfic authors, they just tend to pretend their "work" is art; this guy seems to think it's science. And tell me you don't find a ten year old quoting Feynman creepy. anilEhilated fucked around with this message at 23:24 on Feb 21, 2015 |
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2015 23:14 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 11:06 |
Magic can't do that, you'd have to be a god! Ever the rationalist.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2015 19:10 |
quote:Harry looked away, suddenly ashamed. "I'm sorry," he said in a small voice. "But I have a Mum and Dad. And I know that I'd just make myself unhappy by comparing that reality to... something perfect that I built up in my imagination." Yup, totally a ten year old.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2015 16:35 |
Pvt.Scott posted:See? This guy gets it.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2015 22:28 |
petrol blue posted:Is his dad rich? I was getting "pretentious douche with airs", but that might just be the, uh, default.
|
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2015 21:16 |
Yud decides to do a demonstration of the death of the author, his magnum opus remains unfinished and the world is better for it.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2015 11:07 |
That seems to be a case where actually being rational might spoil his fragile self-image.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 19:33 |
Basically he should've went with Pokemon. Saying that, please tell me there's a section on firebreathing dragons.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2015 10:18 |
Killstick posted:Honest question: If the author had been someone else without the baggage of Less Wrong, would you still think harry was being portrayed as always being right and an author insert, or just as a flawed character? anilEhilated fucked around with this message at 12:33 on Mar 9, 2015 |
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2015 12:30 |
That's it though: he doesn't want to be treated as an equal, he seems to see himself as more of a prophetic "everyone should listen to me because I am always right and you need to be amazed" thing.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2015 21:13 |
That Martin Luther reference sure came out of nowhere. Guess he's a genius for history as well as, er, everything else.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2015 11:42 |
See, having character development would imply he wasn't perfect in the first place, something that simply can not stand when it's a Harry Sue.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2015 16:56 |
He's clearly been talking about about HPMOR. There's meanings hidden in there, just use a bit of kabbalah on the poo poo.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2015 10:52 |
It's because the writing deserves no charity. With Rowling (and any, y'know, good books), I'm willing to suspend my disbelief because I'm enjoying it and I want to read more so I am willing to accept some silliness. There, however, are no redeeming factors for this. Or Patrick Rothfuss, since you mention that - it's not about the lead being portrayed as a bad person, on the contrary, it's about the entire loving world being presented in a way that makes the lead look like less of a poo poo - and that for no reason at all. Similarly, you could argue that nitpicking on the author's nitpicks is just fair treatment.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2015 16:33 |
I honestly don't get all the talk about intelligence being portrayed as a desirable character quality, especially if the example we're getting is Harry. So far he's been acting like a total dork. Parroting theories and aping methods does not an intelligent character make.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2015 18:52 |
Night10194 posted:Really, whenever you see someone talking about how anything is the source of all that's good and holy forever, you should get some warning flags up
|
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2015 12:42 |
quote:So I took another practice test, this time resolving to, as Ben Kenobi would say, "act on instinct". (That actual phrase, in Ben's voice, ran through my head.) (10). I got a 640 Math. The lesson I learned was to trust my intuitions, because my intuitions are always right - probably one of the most important lessons of my entire life. anilEhilated fucked around with this message at 16:25 on Mar 24, 2015 |
|
# ¿ Mar 24, 2015 16:22 |
Remeber, your insticts are always right. Mind you, if your instincts are telling you torture is preferrable to dust spec in the eye given just about any number of examples, you're pretty hosed up in addition to that.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2015 14:30 |
Isn't quantifying the unquantifiable pretty much whas Bayesian statistics are about?
|
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2015 20:44 |
His SCIENCE book list is rather curious. GEB is obviously great but it's more of a generalist, popular thing and the Kahneman/Tversky study on heuristics comes from 1982; if that's his go-to book on psychology, it's a pretty interesting choice. edit: No, that's not how desensivization works.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2015 19:58 |
Or Fu Manchus. Depending on the alignment.
|
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2015 16:29 |
JosephWongKS posted:That does make sense – Slytherins are supposed to be “ambitious, shrewd and cunning”, none of which describes Goyle (or Crabbe) in the canon series. Same with Hermione not automatically ending up in Ravenclaw, I suppose.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2015 07:48 |
Really? Because the impression I'm getting is that it's there to Bow Before The Mighty Harry Sue.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2015 10:40 |
Nietzsche: the greatest rationalist of them all.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2015 18:47 |
Truly, Harry is the (rationalist) messiah, granting the gift of life where there was none by power of sheer obnoxiusness.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2015 17:58 |
WingsOfSteel posted:Slughorn is the most decent Slytherin in the books, and he's also the only Slytherin character in the books who was sorted into the house and graduated before Voldemort came along.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2015 07:08 |
Oh. So he's a weeaboo in addition to everything else.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2015 18:52 |
Wouldn't it be better as Come-tea, then?
|
|
# ¿ May 3, 2015 17:39 |
Well, a Hugo-quality anything is an accolade that's getting redefined this year. Yud wouldn't be out of place there. Shutting up now, okay. edit: One rather weird thing about his Hugo appeal, though - he wants to get into contact with either Rowling or Daniel Radcliffe - what the hell has the actor have to do with book rights? ...Unless there's going to be a movie version. anilEhilated fucked around with this message at 20:52 on Jun 23, 2015 |
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2015 20:50 |
Hyper Crab Tank posted:I would suspect Yudkowski of not really knowing where his story was going at first, and him just writing chapters on whatever took his fancy at the time, but his own words seem to contradict that.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 25, 2015 11:27 |
divabot posted:Apparently Wiseau did another thing. I shudder to contemplate. wikipedia posted:*The A.V. Club noted that the production values and acting quality of The *Neighbors were far worse than those of The Room, and noted the unexplained presence of women in bikinis in several scenes. Wiseau responded to the criticism by saying that the women were meant to be symbolic of sexually liberated women.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2015 20:12 |
Curvature of Earth posted:Eh, the New Testament wasn't that great. Suddenly the Jews don't matter anymore? God needs his flesh-and-blood son (where did that come from!?) to die for some reason? What happened to the pile of rules God spent two whole books laying out? Did they even read the source material?
|
|
# ¿ Jun 29, 2015 12:13 |
PT6A posted:It's called Harry Potter Becomes a Communist, and upon following the link, apparently Commie Potter is a fan of Robert Mugabe.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2015 10:49 |
Well, it's good to know people have contingency plans to deal with time-traveling evil AIs from the future. Really helps you sleep soundly at night.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2015 10:28 |
So the fanfic is basically him begging to be accepted into the Illuminati, right.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2015 18:29 |
divabot posted:The Beisutsukai, you insufficiently rational person who is probably from a low-IQ country. (Ordinary humans were not so impressed.)
|
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2015 09:22 |
And this is what happens when critical thinking takes a nice, long vacation.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 29, 2015 15:12 |
Still makes no sense, though. You can't have things happening in a destroyed universe. I don't see how the last sentence is relevant in any way, either.
anilEhilated fucked around with this message at 09:27 on Jul 30, 2015 |
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2015 09:25 |
I'm assuming that if it was a parody, the other characters wouldn't put with Harry's bullshit as opposed to being as awed as they are. Not to mention it's, y'know, not funny or indicative of criticism of the attitude it's supposed to be parodying in any way.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 3, 2015 14:37 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 11:06 |
what the gently caress is a keer edit: Someone should really get this clown to a psychology 101 course. Somehow the whole thing gets stupider as it goes on. anilEhilated fucked around with this message at 17:25 on Aug 3, 2015 |
|
# ¿ Aug 3, 2015 17:18 |