|
Plafop posted:Post it then. That's all you have to do and you will have beaten the mean old rethuglican conservitard. do your own legwork if you're so curious
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 07:09 |
|
|
without net neutrality, some of these posts might not have been made. and that would be a shame, i feel.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:40
|
|
|
open container posted:that much is obvious You just admitted you know nothing about the upcoming "regulations". thanks for finally being honest, if only by accident.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:40
|
|
|
proof of concept posted:do your own legwork if you're so curious Pathetic.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:40
|
|
|
Plafop posted:You just admitted you know nothing about the upcoming "regulations". thanks for finally being honest, if only by accident. why is regulations in scare quotes? what else might be in regulatory documents. demon summoning spells?
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:41
|
|
|
i haven't read it but i am sure that it is full of "words" and "punctuation"
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:42
|
|
|
EvilJoven posted:I mad about net neutrality because Obama is an atheist muslim friend of the family devil and if he likes something that automatically means its bad. yes! yes!
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:42
|
|
|
Plafop posted:Pathetic. what have you got against 28?
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:43
|
|
|
Plafop posted:regulations i can't believe you're bending over backwards to please some some libtards. shameful
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:43
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:why is regulations in scare quotes? what else might be in regulatory documents. demon summoning spells? Because the document in question has actually been hollowed out and contains a deadly pit viper.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:43
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:why is regulations in scare quotes? what else might be in regulatory documents. demon summoning spells? hail satan
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:43
|
|
|
plafop you should take some lessons from agag, his moral superiority trolling is more subtle and funny
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:44
|
|
|
it's MY right to get SCREWED in the rear end by TELECOM MONOPOLIES!
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:45
|
|
|
op, which cable company do you work for
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:45
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:why is regulations in scare quotes? what else might be in regulatory documents. demon summoning spells? quotation marks are a ward against evil lieberal semantic tricks, and also the evil eye
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:45
|
|
|
GBS Ambassador posted:it's MY right to get SCREWED in the rear end by TELECOM MONOPOLIES! No no more like gently caressed by job creators.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:46
|
|
|
proof of concept posted:what have you got against 28? I can't read it because it's being kept secret. Maybe you could find it for me? You're on Obama's secret club list, yes? You're absurdly claiming that you've seen something no one else but the FCC has, no?
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:46
|
|
|
Ransom posted:Because the document in question has actually been hollowed out and contains a deadly pit viper. oh i see, i've been "poisoned." can i see the snake that bit me? oh, you don't know where it is either? that's convenient.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:47
|
|
|
Plafop posted:I can't read it because it's being kept secret. Maybe you could find it for me? You're on Obama's secret club list, yes? You're absurdly claiming that you've seen something no one else but the FCC has, no? woah I think you're making a lot of assumptions here what is this list you're talking about?
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:49
|
|
|
GBS Ambassador posted:it's MY right to get SCREWED in the rear end by TELECOM MONOPOLIES!
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:50
|
|
|
IM SO MAD ABOUT NET NUTRALITY
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:50
|
|
|
proof of concept posted:woah I think you're making a lot of assumptions here what is this list you're talking about? Pathetic. Thank you for proving my point so well.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:51
|
|
|
This is just another way for B. HUSSEIN Obama to suppress information on chemtrails.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:51
|
|
|
Lieberalism is a mental disorder
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:52
|
|
|
Lots of very funny jokey jokes in this thread, but still no one can point to a single page of the document they like.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:53
|
|
|
Plafop posted:Lots of very funny jokey jokes in this thread, but still no one can point to a single page of the document they like. I too want to see the long-form birth certificate
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:53
|
|
|
Plafop posted:Pathetic. Thank you for proving my point so well. What's pathetic? Look just walk me through the part where me being on a list comes in
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:54
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:on page 69 it says that all americans must suckle obamas "thick mandingo rod" whenever he wants. oh why oh why didn't we listen to whining paranoid cracker idiots I just read page 69 and that's true. Why is only fox news reporting this????
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:55
|
|
|
proof of concept posted:What's pathetic? Look just walk me through the part where me being on a list comes in Just post one page of the document you know nothing about but blindly support. You already said you had seen it even though it's being kept secret. Share the goods man, we wanna see.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:55
|
|
|
The Mad Archivist posted:I too want to see the long-form birth certificate
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:56
|
|
|
Plafop posted:I can't read it because it's being kept secret. Maybe you could find it for me? You're on Obama's secret club list, yes? You're absurdly claiming that you've seen something no one else but the FCC has, no? If it's such a secretive thing, though, how do you know how many pages it has?
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:57
|
|
|
freemason9 posted:If it's such a secretive thing, though, how do you know how many pages it has? That is the only thing they have released about it. It's 332 pages, it's going to be very very good and contain everything your wet liberal mind dreams about, but you can;t see it because it will spoil the surprise. Nothing fishy about that I'm sure. I trust government implicitly.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 17:58
|
|
|
http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/dear-foolish-and-gullible-americans-net-neutrality-is-not-your-friend/ someone posted this on fb and I'm trying to read it but it seems like it's just "GOVERNMENT BAD" rephrased for several dozen paragraphs with nothing more specific than that am I missing something here? is there actually something to be worried about other than GUBMINT REGLATE BAD because i seriously have yet to see it outlined e: sweet it's all just random insane conservative speculation, as i expected, carry on
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 18:01
|
|
|
I'm looking at page 122 here, and this part where "The President shall receive the right of first night as his lordship decrees" seems a little out of place.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 18:01
|
|
|
Dewgy posted:http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/dear-foolish-and-gullible-americans-net-neutrality-is-not-your-friend/ lol the blaze. I miss you so much Glenn Beck.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 18:01
|
|
|
Dewgy posted:http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/dear-foolish-and-gullible-americans-net-neutrality-is-not-your-friend/
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
Dewgy posted:GUBMINT REGLATE BAD I wouldn't blame the author, if this isn't self-evident to you you probably lack basic comprehension skills in the first place.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
Plafop posted:Just post one page of the document you know nothing about but blindly support. You already said you had seen it even though it's being kept secret. Share the goods man, we wanna see. Look you said to post my favorite page and I did: "page 28." There, I did it again, just one page, the one I like the best. I don't understand why you keep putting words in my mouth and claiming I'm on lists and stuff, you can't even make up your mind if I know nothing or if I'm part of some sort of secret inner circle Obama cabal who knows everything. Maybe take a deep breath and count to 10?
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
I wish Glenn Beck still had a cable TV show. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 07:09 |
|
|
I have not read it, and you have not read it, but I assure you it is bad because- reasons.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2015 18:04
|
|
