|
I am playing this game. I will never vote no dunk.
|
#
¿
Mar 14, 2015 17:15
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 16:46 |
|
|
EccoRaven posted:"Deadline is for Monday at 11PM EST!" But if deadline is Monday at 11 PM and we hammer at, say, Sunday 1 PM is new deadline Monday 1 PM?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 14, 2015 19:55
|
|
Meinberg, Town Vanilla, executed. Dr. Hurt, Town Doctor, executed. Asiina, Serial Killer, executed.
|
So how can you promise Friday will be part of day one?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 14, 2015 20:27
|
|
|
Lies Ecco has told -March 13th -Thursday -Across the world
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2015 03:43
|
|
|
My role pm says i'm vt.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 14:14
|
|
|
is marine première ministre yet
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 19:41
|
|
|
ninja: nvm im dumb
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 20:05
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Did anyone catch this? i thought the game hadn't started
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 20:14
|
|
|
if ernie doesn't actually have a way to kill or hunt for the doctor and cop, he's basically vt but we can't trust him if he says he doesn't :-/
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 20:24
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Do you think Ernie is serious in his claim, yes or no? what part of my post makes you think i don't?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 20:28
|
|
|
the role as claimed isn't necessarily anti-town, and i'm not in a rush to turbo someone a few hours into d1
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 20:39
|
|
|
what's he going to do, lead a dunk on a claimed cop?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 20:47
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:you just said there was no way of knowing if he had any powers to compliment the role. if he has powers to complement the role, it's anti-town if he doesn't, it's not necessarily anti-town.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 20:50
|
|
|
i'm not 3p
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 20:52
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:##unvote, ##vote: Pinterest Mom To be clear, you think I'm scum? I don't see an alignment call here, but you say I'm as good a player to vote for as the 3p claim who needs the cop/doctor dead to win?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:I think you are acting weird and are now trying to dodge questions by pushing against ernie without, again, committing to him. Still don't see an alignment call~
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 21:49
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:By definition, if you are not pro-town, you are either scum or third party. While Ernie at least has the possible defense that he was joking, you're posts embody the type of standard low-content scumminess that should be pursued. I haven't said I believe his claim and I haven't said he shouldn't be dunked though?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
Yeah, QPQ reads to me like scum who is jumping on a townie and trying to get him dunked for a few awkward posts.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 22:21
|
|
|
You asked if I took the claim seriously (i.e. if I thought it was a joke claim). I said I did. That's not the same as believing it. There's no contradiction.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 22:50
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:You asked if I took the claim seriously (i.e. if I thought it was a joke claim). I said I did. That's not the same as believing it. There's no contradiction. and, actually, you asked if I took the claim seriously in response to a post that only made sense if I didn't think the claim was a joke.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2015 22:55
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Why necessarily? Executing a 3P wastes our only kill opportunity and doesn't advance our goal to eliminate the scum. I know that 3P can go and may often side with the scum, but this early on they're as much a threat if not more so to them than they are to us since we still have a huge numerical advantage. this is a ~lights out~ game we can dunk as many people in a day as we want EccoRaven posted:------- killing a benign 3p doesn't keep us from killing more people, but does get scum a bit closer to their wincon.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2015 12:56
|
|
SPECIAL GAME RULES
|
In retrospect, Ernie's use of the word "controversial" when claiming makes it pretty clear that he was referring something that had already happened and not making a serious claim.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2015 23:27
|
|
|
Including me? 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2015 23:34
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Fair enough ##vote anon Anon has played a single-digit number of games, saying D1 is useless isn't a reason to vote for her.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2015 23:51
|
|
|
Are you explaining Keane's own joke back at him?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 00:22
|
|
|
This is an odd + unnecessary time to softclaim.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 04:37
|
|
|
I'd expect "after any kind of pressure at all", at a minimum.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 04:55
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Real chat: how is not voting the claimed 3p not the immediate move here? Do we have an actual claimed 3p? I think I missed that.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 19:02
|
|
|
Aren't there three red flags in four words in "town aligned elite bodyguard"  ##vote numerrik
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 19:57
|
|
|
that's not the town alignment name revolutionaries don't have elite bodyguards, kings do bodyguards don't seek out and kill people
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 20:16
|
|
|
huh i win when scum all eliminated and my alignment isn't called town
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 20:20
|
|
|
i'm not sure i should claim it, it might be important
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 20:22
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:okay it's up to you i thought you and qpq's reactions were consistent with noticing it 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 20:30
|
|
|
i think it's sketch that num has claimed both a bodyguard and a nk
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:Elite bodyguards kill anyone attempting to nightkill their target, at least as far as I remember. oh, i guess he doesn't explicitly claim that his kill is something he proactively does. ##unvote
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 22:08
|
|
|
oh my god somber this semantic argument isn't important.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 23:37
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Hey PMom, wanna talk about your specific alignment name? Not really. It's not "town", but I couldn't tell from my role pm that it wasn't the default town alignment name.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2015 23:58
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Fair enough.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2015 00:05
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:I'm not trying to "gotcha" you. I'm asking you to reflect on merk and Somber. I was answering in a roundabout way. Somber is very concerned with the semantics of pro-town vs actual "town-it-says-Town-in-your-role-pm", and he's ignoring the guy who claims an alignment with a town wincon but with an alignment name different from Town. I don't know what that means for Somber's alignment, though, and I don't know that it's particularly scummy - I would expect Scumber to be jumping on me for this, but I would also expect town Somber to hound me, so idk. Merk I'm having trouble making sense of at all and I don't have as good a grasp on his play style.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2015 00:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 16:46 |
|
|
I'm feeling imgay for scum. Soft claiming this early might be bad play, but it's not scummy. ##vote imgay
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2015 01:27
|
|