|
People ITT need to stop misusing OMGUS.
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 14:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 07:49 |
|
|
Asiina posted:People ITT need to stop misusing OMGUS. omgus
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 14:24
|
|
|
It's morning and time for me to find a scum. I raise my hands to the air - I need ya'lls help by sending me along your energy so I can truly obliterate this evil
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:01
|
|
|
##vote Chic Trombone Isn't saying much and seems content to sit on the sidelines while content is being generated.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:03
|
|
|
TheRam posted:yeh I'm powerful it's true just not often people admit it xD
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:04
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:##vote Chic Trombone Any comments on the content? Or are you just going to ignore everything that has been discussed and call out a lurker?
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:04
|
|
|
I'm rereading now for more pointed comments and the content posted thusfar is really lacking anyway so yeah, my vote is fine. You'll need to allow me time as I am also at work. Thanks for the concern though, Amnistar.Asiina posted:Mornacale's not a joke vote: This case seems more made up than a self professed prod vote on Asiina. Not sure what to make of Mornacle but Asiina is on the scummy side of the spectrum because while I believe neither side believes in their vote, Asiina wants me to think that she does believe in hers.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:12
|
|
|
Rurea posted:I think mornacale and asiina are being weird This is a very scummy post. Being "weird" is the biggest copout you can give in mafia. Scum has the hardest time in the early game and this says to me "having a hard time". Would vote. ##vote Rurea
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:14
|
|
|
Rurea posted:It reads as a fake scum/scum interaction imo This vote is also scummy. What in the world makes you think scum/scum? Rurea is our best vote.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:17
|
|
|
I thought chic looked kind of scummy but I remember playing with her before and I don't think what you've seen is really an alignment tell. She came across kind of self conscious and non-committal and wasn't obnoxious at least in the early game.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:18
|
|
|
I guess what I'm saying is chic's posting style doesn't annoy me and I don't think I'd want to kill anyone I have that meta on early. it's possible chic played a lot more in between when we both played ages ago tho. and I'm constructing these reads based on like 2-3 posts at most I can remember reading yesterday
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:19
|
|
|
Mornacale posted:Everything seems weird because we kept failing to break out of the joke zone imho. I REALLY do not like this. Why did you feel the need to justify your "weirdness", Mornacle?
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:19
|
|
|
TheRam posted:self conscious and non-committal These are things we look for when looking for scum, especially with someone as experienced as Chic
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:20
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:This vote is also scummy. What in the world makes you think scum/scum? I'm just spitballin' here
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:21
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:I REALLY do not like this. Why did you feel the need to justify your "weirdness", Mornacle? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:22
|
|
|
I really don't like the post vomit of calling everyone scum on surface cases. I also don't like the dismissal of all the discussion had so far as meaningless or without sibstance. Would vote for the long name I can't remember above who just post vomited.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:25
|
|
|
I don't like your ability level regarding mafia but theres lots of things we don't like in this world, Amnistar.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:27
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:I don't like your ability level regarding mafia but theres lots of things we don't like in this world, Amnistar. hmm so far you might be kind of bad dude idk I'll probably be able to make this decision within the next... 10 hours
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:31
|
|
|
TheRam posted:hmm so far you might be kind of bad dude idk Amnistar has for two posts in a row attempted to convince me he is very stupid/limited. I'm not particularly interested in considering his opinion.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:35
|
|
|
Nobody has sacked up in this game and started the content process. The closest thing to that were the crappy cases I just remarked on, neither of which are very illuminating.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:36
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Nobody has sacked up in this game and started the content process. The closest thing to that were the crappy cases I just remarked on, neither of which are very illuminating. Uhhh.. this is demonstrably false. The two posts you pulled out of the thread are, in fact, in the center of many people talking about cases and alignment. The fact that you didn't quite them doesn't make them non existent
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:47
|
|
|
Amnistar posted:I really don't like the post vomit of calling everyone scum on surface cases. I don't have my own opinion because I haven't read a lot of the thread but this post seems super legit
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:50
|
|
|
Amnistar posted:Uhhh.. this is demonstrably false. The fact that people talked about them doesn't mean that what they said is in any way meaningful.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:51
|
|
|
Current scum picks (of which I only have 3 because calling everyone scum is dumb) Mornacale - attempted to jump into the content game early by calling out Asiina for making jokes when not 20 minutes earlier he was making jokes himself. When I pressed him to find out why it was okay for him to jok and not Asiina he couldn't answer and stopped respondong. Kleedrac - after being called out for buddying up in joke phase his response was poor and then his contribution to the game was a lurker call out. His posting is stilted and awkward. GUISSEPPE - jumps into the game and attempts to shape conversation by posting lovely cases and ignoring the cases made against the above except vaguely saying that no one is doing anything. In fact his first call out is a lurker that has done nothing he himself hasn't done. His responses to me asking him about these things is to attack me rather than make responses.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:52
|
|
|
Yes, your way is dumb. Now you know what I feel and you can stop being passive aggressive.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 15:58
|
|
|
And now that you've called my cases lovely, why don't you address them and tell me why they are shittier than a "you're joking too much ##vote" "yeah well you're a butt :F ##vote" and I will listen with eyes fixed upon ye and ears clear of distraction.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:16
|
|
|
Personally I wouldn't vote Diqnol over agression + post vomit, that's just Diq bein' Diq. I DO think it's weird that he jumped from me to Rurea so quickly though. Like 10 minutes passed between the votes Don't think it's enough to call him scum tho
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:27
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:Let's dissect this fantastic vote on me. I agree with Quidnose here ##vote Kleedrac
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:29
|
|
|
I'm a little out of the loop here, what do you guys mean when you keep saying omgus?
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:30
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:And now that you've called my cases lovely, why don't you address them and tell me why they are shittier than a "you're joking too much ##vote" "yeah well you're a butt :F ##vote" and I will listen with eyes fixed upon ye and ears clear of distraction. Your "cases" are this is scummy. Vote. Each of mine explains why I think it was scummy. Bad tone, duplicity, being unable to explain reasoning when pressed and, in your case, using intimodation to force people to follow your lead. You aren't making cases or engaging people. You aren't attempting to convince people that your cases are right. You are making a statements about alignment and attempting to bully people to your way of thinking. I mean hell, I spelled out my cases and your response was, if you're so awesome why don't you explain your cases then. You aren't reading the thread. You don't care.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:30
|
|
|
imgay posted:I'm a little out of the loop here, what do you guys mean when you keep saying omgus? Oh My god U Scum Omgsu is a term for someone that votes someone else on the basis that they voted for them. I.e. you voted for me so you must be scum. It's then used incorrectly to mean anyone voting for anyone else for any reason ever.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:32
|
|
|
Amnistar posted:Any comments on the content? Or are you just going to ignore everything that has been discussed and call out a lurker? My first reaction to this post was that Amnistar was trying to jump on me for putting down a lazy vote before a reread because he saw an opportunity, especially since he should know I make a post like that and then launch into a series of posts afterwards on the regular. It read to me like he was trying to look like he was looking for scum rather than looking for scum. His doubling down since and his dismissal of my points without apparently reading them at all say to me he is very probably scum.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:33
|
|
|
Amnistar posted:Oh I always thought it was Oh My God You Suck
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:33
|
|
|
Amnistar posted:Your "cases" are this is scummy. Vote. Okay dipshit, here's what's happening. I am insulting you repeatedly. This is because you are not saying things that make sense coming from a rational human mind. I am asking people questions. That is the definition of engaging people. I am being mean to 1 (one) person. Bullying has nothing to do with it. As to convincing people that my cases are right, it is page 3 of non jokephase. The important thing here is interactions. Cases like that will come later from everybody. There's an interesting tidbit here to those following along, though: quote:You are making a statements about alignment and attempting to bully people to your way of thinking. I don't think he's reading what I'm saying.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:39
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:My first reaction to this post was that Amnistar was trying to jump on me for putting down a lazy vote before a reread because he saw an opportunity, especially since he should know I make a post like that and then launch into a series of posts afterwards on the regular. It read to me like he was trying to look like he was looking for scum rather than looking for scum. His doubling down since and his dismissal of my points without apparently reading them at all say to me he is very probably scum. A.) Why the gently caress shoukd I know your play? I have been in I think 1 game since I came back from a year+ sabbatical. B.) So he made this post where it looks like he is looking for scum, so he must be scum. C.) I am immensely suprised that you are starting to case me now that I am calling you scum and refusing to back down. *sarasm*
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:40
|
|
|
I suppose I agree with Quidnose, too!
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:41
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:I suppose I agree with Quidnose, too! But I thought there weren't any real cases made yet diqnol? I mean you read through everything and already commented on the important stuff right?
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:43
|
|
|
imgay posted:I'm a little out of the loop here, what do you guys mean when you keep saying omgus? omgus means oh my god you suck the idea behind it being that when A votes B, if B then votes A it's usually dismissed as an emotional vote because "I AM TOWN AND YOU'RE VOTING ME THEREFORE YOU MUST BE SCUM!!!" at least that's how I've always taken it, an OMGUS vote is usually meant in sincerity however it is a bad vote. usually calling someone's votes OMGUS is lazy, but it also can summarise quite succintly what you think of someones vote. it's over used and people use it so varyingly that you're better of just articulating without using an acronym
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:43
|
|
|
Amnistar posted:A.) Why the gently caress shoukd I know your play? I have been in I think 1 game since I came back from a year+ sabbatical. Guiseppe Pizzapie is Diqnol, Amnistar.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 07:49 |
|
|
Oh nm you got that
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2015 16:44
|
|