|
Robo Reagan posted:im gay me 2 lets have robotic gay sex
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 14:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 10:46 |
|
|
The cast of Seinfeld, Jerry, Elaine, George, and Kramer, have a layover in a small New England town. They witness a robbery in broad daylight. The robber has his hand in his pocket, and the victim shouts that the man has a gun. As soon as the robber runs away, a policeman appears on the scene; but instead of pursuing the robber, he arrests Jerry, Elaine, George, and Kramer for having violated the new "Good Samaritan" law of the town. Since the four of them spent the time of the robbery making fun of the victim, who was fat, their role in the matter doesn't look good, and at their trial everyone who has ever felt wronged by them in the course of the television series testifies against them. They are convicted. Is this just? What were they supposed to do during the robbery? Should they have rushed the robber, just in case he didn't really have a gun?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 14:25
|
|
|
A misanthrope posted:The cast of Seinfeld, Jerry, Elaine, George, and Kramer, have a layover in a small New England town. They witness a robbery in broad daylight. The robber has his hand in his pocket, and the victim shouts that the man has a gun. As soon as the robber runs away, a policeman appears on the scene; but instead of pursuing the robber, he arrests Jerry, Elaine, George, and Kramer for having violated the new "Good Samaritan" law of the town. Since the four of them spent the time of the robbery making fun of the victim, who was fat, their role in the matter doesn't look good, and at their trial everyone who has ever felt wronged by them in the course of the television series testifies against them. They are convicted. Is this just? What were they supposed to do during the robbery? Should they have rushed the robber, just in case he didn't really have a gun? They should've gone for it because they have no future and nothing to lose: 
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 14:30
|
|
|
A misanthrope posted:The cast of Seinfeld, Jerry, Elaine, George, and Kramer, have a layover in a small New England town. They witness a robbery in broad daylight. The robber has his hand in his pocket, and the victim shouts that the man has a gun. As soon as the robber runs away, a policeman appears on the scene; but instead of pursuing the robber, he arrests Jerry, Elaine, George, and Kramer for having violated the new "Good Samaritan" law of the town. Since the four of them spent the time of the robbery making fun of the victim, who was fat, their role in the matter doesn't look good, and at their trial everyone who has ever felt wronged by them in the course of the television series testifies against them. They are convicted. Is this just? What were they supposed to do during the robbery? Should they have rushed the robber, just in case he didn't really have a gun? this was the series finale of MASH
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 14:49
|
|
|
Nefarious posted:this was the series finale of MASH oh yeah and it turned out everything happened inside an autistic kids mind
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 14:50
|
|
|
Every post you make must be absolute horrendous garbage, but in return, every time you post an innocent life is saved. Do you post? I think I know the answer!
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 14:56
|
|
|
Zzulu posted:You're trapped inside the body of a man, but you are a woman in the brains. What do you do? I keep posting pictures of myself doing the pixar face in gbs forever.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 15:07
|
|
|
An underwater tunnel is being constructed despite an almost certain loss of several lives [actually, all but certain]. Presumably the expected loss is a calculated cost that society is prepared to pay for having the tunnel ["society" doesn't make any such calculation]. At a critical moment when a fitting must be lowered into place, a workman is trapped in a section of the partly laid tunnel. If it is lowered, it will surely crush the trapped workman to death. Yet, if it is not and a time consuming rescue of the workman is attempted, the tunnel will have to be abandoned and the whole project begun anew. Two workmen have already died in the project as a result of anticipated and unavoidable conditions in the building of the tunnel. What should be done? Was it a mistake to begin the tunnel in the first place? But don't we take such risks all the time?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 15:55
|
|
|
*pushes fat man in front of train before noticing people stuck on tracks*A misanthrope posted:An underwater tunnel is being constructed despite an almost certain loss of several lives [actually, all but certain]. Presumably the expected loss is a calculated cost that society is prepared to pay for having the tunnel ["society" doesn't make any such calculation]. At a critical moment when a fitting must be lowered into place, a workman is trapped in a section of the partly laid tunnel. If it is lowered, it will surely crush the trapped workman to death. Yet, if it is not and a time consuming rescue of the workman is attempted, the tunnel will have to be abandoned and the whole project begun anew. Two workmen have already died in the project as a result of anticipated and unavoidable conditions in the building of the tunnel. What should be done? Was it a mistake to begin the tunnel in the first place? But don't we take such risks all the time? crush him, then abandon the project
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 15:55
|
|
|
Cumslut1895 posted:*pushes fat man in front of train before noticing people stuck on tracks* lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 15:56
|
|
|
A misanthrope posted:An underwater tunnel is being constructed despite an almost certain loss of several lives [actually, all but certain]. Presumably the expected loss is a calculated cost that society is prepared to pay for having the tunnel ["society" doesn't make any such calculation]. At a critical moment when a fitting must be lowered into place, a workman is trapped in a section of the partly laid tunnel. If it is lowered, it will surely crush the trapped workman to death. Yet, if it is not and a time consuming rescue of the workman is attempted, the tunnel will have to be abandoned and the whole project begun anew. Two workmen have already died in the project as a result of anticipated and unavoidable conditions in the building of the tunnel. What should be done? Was it a mistake to begin the tunnel in the first place? But don't we take such risks all the time? Will his funeral be attended by a lot of his workmates, slowing the project down by a lot anyway, or is he a jerk they'll just shrug their shoulders over?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 16:54
|
|
|
goatface posted:Will his funeral be attended by a lot of his workmates, slowing the project down by a lot anyway, or is he a jerk they'll just shrug their shoulders over? they won't go to his funeral but productivity will go down when they all take turns loving his widow
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 16:56
|
|
|
stick the dynermight in the fat man's b-hole
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 16:58
|
|
|
A misanthrope posted:they won't go to his funeral but productivity will go down when they all take turns loving his widow Can we kill his widow?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 17:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 10:46 |
|
|
goatface posted:Can we kill his widow? yeah let's put her in the tunnel moral quandary solved and we still have time for lunch
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2015 17:03
|
|