|
same
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 11:44 |
|
|
hello everyone I am here for the mafia i have a cool power that could backfire if I use it on scum so everyone please act scummy if you are scum and act towny if you are town thank you, that is all
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
MC Eating Disorder posted:please act scummy if you are scum and act towny if you are town prolly too late for that
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I talked about why I think the things that I think. I'm not sure what part in particular you're having trouble understanding, could you elaborate? I just think you're taking what was obviously a joke as if it were a real claim and making cases off of it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:38
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Yeah I was gonna say that imgay was real lurky in the last game(s? Can't remember if it was just that one or another one too) and him coming out of the gate so posty and jokey is way different from what I expected from him. Brazen scum or personality makeover? Yeah, he was a super lurker in my last game with him, where he was scum. This is new and different.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:49
|
|
|
JakeP posted:When has a dude who "scum claimed" day 1 (like literal day 1 of day 1) ever not been town? I scum claimed as scum on what was effectively day 1(I think it was day 2, but there were no deaths day1/night1).
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:51
|
|
|
Mafia edit: In Taste's game.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:51
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:It's a lot more useful than my power. Mine is super useless. Thus me using it in advance for the next 10 days. Doesn't matter.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:52
|
|
|
imgay posted:I've gained more confidence in my posting once my Kevin James gbs thread took off  Obviously imgay's new-found posting volume can be attributed to this successful GBS Kevin James thread
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:54
|
|
|
crap i didnt copy URL and still have my scrum gif
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:54
|
|
|
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3713107
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:55
|
|
|
Someone needs to make a game and give a player a rugby post restriction
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:56
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I just think you're taking what was obviously a joke as if it were a real claim and making cases off of it. Are you talking about imgay voting mark or scum claiming?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:56
|
|
|
It doesn't matter its joke phase!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:58
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Are you talking about imgay voting mark or scum claiming? Why are you so convinced either was serious?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 00:58
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:It doesn't matter its joke phase!!! What I'm getting here is that you didn't try to read the thread.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:05
|
|
|
I am like 85% sure imgay is town
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:09
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Why are you so convinced either was serious? I'm not convinced, but I'm making a better argument than 'but what if you're wrong?' That merk vote sure looked serious to me, Merk is a claimed Miller and there was at least one other vote on him that page.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:10
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I'm not convinced, but I'm making a better argument than 'but what if you're wrong?' That merk vote sure looked serious to me, Merk is a claimed Miller and there was at least one other vote on him that page. I know imgay outside of this forum, and I have read all of his games he has played on this forum. I think this is the first game he has been in with a miller, and am not even convinced he knows what one is.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:11
|
|
|
my point being that he absolutely has no idea how these forums treat miller claims
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:13
|
|
|
Yet he voted one anyway because? I don't really care about meta arguments. Wait Jake why did you subtly imply merk is scum and then back away once gay voted?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:13
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Yet he voted one anyway because? I don't really care about meta arguments. I didn't do any such thing. I said that it is something that scum Merk would do, but it is also something that miller Merk would do.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:15
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Yet he voted one anyway because? I don't really care about meta arguments. And as to why imgay voted Merk who knows, maybe because the guy just made a post about how he always gets away with murder, so imgay decided to vote him so that he would not?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:16
|
|
|
I'm done having this argument with somber in every single game.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:16
|
|
|
That seems to be an implication. It doesn't really matter if gay knows about miller claims, he saw mounting pressure and hopped on.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:18
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:That seems to be an implication. much like the votes on imgay?1
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
except those dudes are mad abscent and imgay stuck around poo poo posting like a dude who dont give a gently caress
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I'm done having this argument with somber in every single game. I think you need to have a point too before it's an argument.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:24
|
|
|
JakeP posted:merk would claim miller as scum, then remind us of the post he just made the other week about how more scum should claim miller as scum JakeP posted:I didn't do any such thing. I said that it is something that scum Merk would do, but it is also something that miller Merk would do. So there's a difference between these two posts, Jake.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:So there's a difference between these two posts, Jake. Saying someone would do something as scum isn't saying they are scum
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:26
|
|
|
JakeP posted:And as to why imgay voted Merk who knows, maybe because the guy just made a post about how he always gets away with murder, so imgay decided to vote him so that he would not? would be nice to hear imgay answering these questions. If he's town you shouldn't have a problem with him answering for himself.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:26
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Saying someone would do something as scum isn't saying they are scum no you're right it's a subtle implication
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:26
|
|
|
what question
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:27
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:no you're right Nah its not you misunderstand
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:27
|
|
|
what I said is completely null of a current read, but implies that I do not 100% believe merks claim on its merits alone and will be keeping my eyes on him for suspicious behavior
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:28
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I think you need to have a point too before it's an argument. My point is that you are taking posts that were clearly a joke as serious
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:28
|
|
|
somber i cannot tell if you are being thorough, or if you are trying to find a molehill to make a mountain out of, all your points are super reaching so far, which is fine because its early, but lets not pretend anything you are saying is an honest read
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:29
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:My point is that you are taking posts that were clearly a joke as serious Do you have a better argument to make? I think you're just dismissing this out of hand because I posted it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:30
|
|
|
JakeP posted:somber i cannot tell if you are being thorough, or if you are trying to find a molehill to make a mountain out of, all your points are super reaching so far, which is fine because its early, but lets not pretend anything you are saying is an honest read it's reaching for me to suggest that imgay might be scum. it's reasonable for you say that you're 85% sure imgay is town?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 11:44 |
|
|
Somberbrero posted:it's reaching for me to suggest that imgay might be scum. No. Its reaching to say that imgays Merk vote was serious, and it is reaching to say that I implied Merk is scum. My read on imgay is completely meta but I have known him for years so therefore yes it is mad reasonable
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2015 01:33
|
|