|
I'm here and I like Mafia.
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2015 15:47
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 03:13 |
|
|
I buy things gently used on eBay like a poor adult.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 20:56
|
|
|
imgay posted:Fear vote him or ill vote you. ##vote imgay
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 21:02
|
|
|
very sure that imgay is scrum.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 21:06
|
|
|
merk posted:Persuade us to lynch someone in this here game. Hi Merk. imgay scumclaimed. You should lunch anyone who scumclaims, even as a joke. It's not a normal, town reaction to pressure. imgay stopped pushing you once he was called out on voting you. I think imgay would say that his vote was a joke, but it was not. There was clearly serious traction behind voting you. I would also vote chaoslord.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
Jake I'm glad you're playing Mafia again.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:I submitted my night action. I'm going to travel back in time to take out Hitler. Hi Birdstrike. Do you think that forums poster 'imgay' is scum?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 21:54
|
|
|
I've played several games with imgay. I don't think his meta factors into my argument.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 22:06
|
|
|
imgay posted:So what reads to you this game on me compared to others? I dunno why that would matter.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 22:18
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Ah, there's the fun killing somber I know. Are you seriously trying to make a real case out of this joke phase nonsense? Yes. What's wrong with that?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 22:34
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Well I am sort of sitting back and seeing if Somber has some kind of trap sprung play for the people voting imgay or if he is actually serious, because that is a scummy case No, I'm serious. I dunno why you're speaking for imgay, but I don't consider his awkward jokes much of a defense.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
I think avoiding direct engagement and claiming right off the bat aren't natural town reactions to pressure.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 22:50
|
|
|
I don't understand how the posts that you quoted connect to the argument you are making, or what your argument is.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 22:59
|
|
|
JakeP posted:I think claiming a semi-verifiable power role day 1 is a pretty risky move for scum, especially as early as he made his claim. Yes. Earlier I voted imgay for scumclaiming and his behavior towards mark. I do not see how claiming tracker is a risky move for scrum.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 23:01
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:There wasn't even any pressure on him? It's joke phase let it go There was a miller claim off the bat, this game did not get a jokephase.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 23:02
|
|
|
JakeP posted:any claim that pidgeon holes you for the rest of the game is not in the scums best interest to make 3 hours into day 1 It's better than being lunched. I don't think imgay is fakeclaiming, I think he is a scum tracker. I don't think it puts him in an extraordinarily stressful position going forward.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 23:41
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:You're ridiculous. Why would anyone do that? I don't understand your play and I guess I never will. I thought your tunneling someone on day 1 was a scum tell but I guess it's just your terrible strategy that you use in every game but never works I talked about why I think the things that I think. I'm not sure what part in particular you're having trouble understanding, could you elaborate?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 23:56
|
|
|
JakeP posted:When has a dude who "scum claimed" day 1 (like literal day 1 of day 1) ever not been town? A game that happened like a month ago. You're selectively engaging content, although I don't think that necessarily makes you scum. I think that scum claim was scummy, but I think the behavior preceding that, his vote and later unvote of merk, is much scummier.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 00:13
|
|
|
It's a lot more useful than my power.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 00:18
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I just think you're taking what was obviously a joke as if it were a real claim and making cases off of it. Are you talking about imgay voting mark or scum claiming?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 00:56
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:It doesn't matter its joke phase!!! What I'm getting here is that you didn't try to read the thread.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:05
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Why are you so convinced either was serious? I'm not convinced, but I'm making a better argument than 'but what if you're wrong?' That merk vote sure looked serious to me, Merk is a claimed Miller and there was at least one other vote on him that page.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:10
|
|
|
Yet he voted one anyway because? I don't really care about meta arguments. Wait Jake why did you subtly imply merk is scum and then back away once gay voted?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:13
|
|
|
That seems to be an implication. It doesn't really matter if gay knows about miller claims, he saw mounting pressure and hopped on.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:18
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I'm done having this argument with somber in every single game. I think you need to have a point too before it's an argument.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:24
|
|
|
JakeP posted:merk would claim miller as scum, then remind us of the post he just made the other week about how more scum should claim miller as scum JakeP posted:I didn't do any such thing. I said that it is something that scum Merk would do, but it is also something that miller Merk would do. So there's a difference between these two posts, Jake.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
JakeP posted:And as to why imgay voted Merk who knows, maybe because the guy just made a post about how he always gets away with murder, so imgay decided to vote him so that he would not? would be nice to hear imgay answering these questions. If he's town you shouldn't have a problem with him answering for himself.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:26
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Saying someone would do something as scum isn't saying they are scum no you're right it's a subtle implication
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:26
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:My point is that you are taking posts that were clearly a joke as serious Do you have a better argument to make? I think you're just dismissing this out of hand because I posted it.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:30
|
|
|
JakeP posted:somber i cannot tell if you are being thorough, or if you are trying to find a molehill to make a mountain out of, all your points are super reaching so far, which is fine because its early, but lets not pretend anything you are saying is an honest read it's reaching for me to suggest that imgay might be scum. it's reasonable for you say that you're 85% sure imgay is town?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:32
|
|
|
i'm way more willing to admit that i'm wrong about his vote, whether or not it was serious matters less i think, but i think it's pretty clear you implied that merk was scum there. that's like, the literal definition of an implication. also your follow-up post was not at all what you said originally.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:35
|
|
|
i just like to play mafia guys.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
i think we ALL owe each other an apology if i have to break down individual parts of speech
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:40
|
|
|
sentence diagramming will be the next big mafia trend.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:41
|
|
|
english is cool
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 01:47
|
|
|
Mornacale posted:Soooo I feel pretty confident that Somber is being an idiot but is town. these ideas seem incongruous? 1. Somber is town, an idiot. 2. imgay is behaving strangely, unclear as to alignment. 3. jake is scum based on imgay flipping town. if i'm an idiot then fair enough, but you're noticing the same problems that I had with imgay, so it is weird that you think i'm an idiot? are you confused about imgay's role claim? that seem unambiguously serious to me. your argument for jake is pointless when imgay is still alive. it also bothers me that you think that because jake and i disagree on another player, he should be voting me. I'd like to hear more from chaos.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 17:46
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:will not vote jakep this game, merk playing like town, mornacale still cool this isn't a gotcha, jesus. 'somberbrero is an idiot for casing imgay, but town' --> 'i don't know what to think about imgay' --> 'jake is scum for buddying up to imgay before imgay flips town.' you can see how those thoughts don't necessarily follow. at best your argument is scum because wrong.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 19:01
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:There are two and a half days left in D1 and this is my 12th post. I'm easily on track to have the most posts in a game I've ever had! I even participated in jokes. What more do you want? i missed your recent response. i have no idea what you're thinking other than that imgay is scum. any reads on merk/jake/morn?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 19:03
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Oh if you have bad arguments that means you're def scum? you'd save some time if you just kept 'NUH-UH' in your clipboard for easy access.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 19:04
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 03:13 |
|
|
but but the incongruity is right there merk noticed it too
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 19:06
|
|