Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Heavy neutrino
Sep 16, 2007

You made a fine post for yourself. ...For a casualry, I suppose.
The most amazing thing to me in this case is that the justice system reached for a racketeering charge; some of the people involved stood to receive bonuses of up to $2k for improving test performance, therefore they're obviously directly comparable to loving mobsters.

My Imaginary GF posted:

Once again, I ask, what was the race of the individuals involved in Atlanta

I'm fairly sure they're all black.

edit: oh yeah, and the shithead judge presiding over the case had the balls to say "I don't like sending people to prison, but..."

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Heavy neutrino
Sep 16, 2007

You made a fine post for yourself. ...For a casualry, I suppose.

Baron Porkface posted:

Is there a reason I shouldn't believe that to be racketeering?

Depends on what you mean by the question. If you're asking whether their behavior contravenes RICO, it probably does. If you're asking whether it's part of the scope of RICO as declared when it was introduced in congress as acting for "the elimination of the infiltration of organized crime and racketeering into legitimate organizations operating in interstate commerce," well, it's just utterly silly. Maybe I'm just being cynical but my hunch is that if they were white and affluent, the charges would be different and much less severe.

  • Locked thread