|
sig triggered (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) ----------------
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 15:42 |
|
|
Drone_Fragger posted:One or two line sigs are fine but some cunts are taking the piss with the loving half page monstrositys that make pages a hideous shitpile to read.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:12
|
|
|
sigs are dumb i hope ralph bans everyone who uses it
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:13
|
|
|
i agree that some sigs are gross and bad and that overusing them is annoying and bad. good for rolf.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:15
|
|
|
Gilok posted:I like the new rule because the people who are upset about it are exactly the sort of people I want to be upset. First Ralp came for the threads about IRC, and I said nothing for I did not post in the threads about IRC, Then Ralp came for the sigs, and I said nothing for I did not have a sig, Then Ralp came for the gangtags, and there was no-one left to speak for me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:15
|
|
|
ookiimarukochan posted:First Ralp came for the threads about IRC, and I said nothing for I did not post in the threads about IRC, GAR- BAGE DICK
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:16
|
|
|
zVxTeflon posted:Im a dumb gay baby who is afraid of fun and hates happiness is there a big strong daddy to come change my diapy??
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:18
|
|
|
social vegan posted:i am ready to abandon my ways and make this forum a safer place Yeah!
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:22
|
|
|
Look at all these retard morons that haven't had sigs turned off since 2001.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:23
|
|
|
whats a sig
----------------
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:24
|
|
|
SAABs are bad cars
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:24
|
|
|
Sintax posted:having a really big sig is a good joke in 1998 And all I have is this old June is endboss month sig anyway
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:27
|
|
|
Ralp posted:Yeah! u got it champ
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:27
|
|
|
what happened posted:SAABs are bad cars bitch i cut u
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:27
|
|
|
ralp will take their sigs from their cold dead hands
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
What constitutes a garish or unsightly sig? Who is to be the judge of this? Is mine annoying? If there's an option to turn sigs off, why should anyone care about the quality of sigs?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:32
|
|
|
Seems like now more people than ever have sigs
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:34
|
|
|
West SAAB Story posted:GAR- I could always go for  but I'm too broke to throw $5 at an avatar right now - oh and it'd have to link to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWu3JqLMImY somehow
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:36
|
|
|
Jimbo Jaggins posted:Seems like now more people than ever have sigs lol this is a good sig (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:36
|
|
|
Charles Bukowski posted:Who is to be the judge of this? Is mine annoying? The administrators and moderators, and yes. edit: Thank you for [timg]ing the large image  It's fine now. It's fine to display a huge ugly sig in CCCC btw, or FYAD for that matter. If you don't turn it on in GBS or other gray forums, you have nothing to worry about.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:38
|
|
|
im gonna give you a hot forum tip! you can turn sigs off!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:40
|
|
|
I didn't even know you could have sigs enabled. Are they off by default? I don't remember turning them off or where the option to do so would be but I don't see any. If they're disabled by default then good call because sigs are loving stupid just like the people who use them. edit: holy gently caress there is an option to turn them on. Why in the world would anyone do that?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:41
|
|
|
i dont even like that theres like 25 wasted pixels between the bottom of a post and that little bar underneath why would i want sigs on
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:43
|
|
|
pro sig foreva
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:48
|
|
|
first 'he' came for the goatse, and I did not speak out. then 'he' came for the threads and I did not speak out. then 'he' came for the sigs and I did not speak out. then 'he' came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:52
|
|
|
www posted:first 'he' came for the goatse, and I did not speak out. then 'he' came for the threads and I did not speak out. then 'he' came for the sigs and I did not speak out. See this might have been funny or cool or whatever if I'd not made the same joke, only better, almost an hour ago.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:55
|
|
|
ookiimarukochan posted:See this might have been funny or cool or whatever if I'd not made the same joke, only better, almost an hour ago. but unlike you, www is funny
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:56
|
|
|
They don't have signatures in Reddit, and look how banging that site is. I say, get rid of the sigs, and the avatars too.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2015 23:56
|
|
|
West SAAB Story posted:but unlike you, www is funny yes, that's right, as "funny" as you both are "special".
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:01
|
|
|
ralp is a loving signature nazi
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:14
|
|
|
ookiimarukochan posted:yes, that's right, as "funny" as you both are "special". sick burn bro
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:19
|
|
|
Gonna copy this entire thread and make it my sig
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:21
|
|
|
ookiimarukochan posted:yes, that's right, as "funny" as you both are "special". goddamn 
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:23
|
|
|
people using sigs in TOOYL 2015 lmbo
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
Signs are fun, I've been meaning to make one for ages. Scoffers should go to reddit!!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
I like mine. Small and to the point.
LSD CURES JUNKIES fucked around with this message at 01:20 on Apr 18, 2015 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:39
|
|
|
would this be alright for a sig or is it too long?
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:43
|
|
|
ded posted:people using sigs in TOOYL 2015 lmbo
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:44
|
|
|
Libelous Slander posted:would this be alright for a sig or is it too long? looks good to me
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 15:42 |
|
|
Libelous Slander posted:would this be alright for a sig or is it too long? But its not flashing...
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2015 00:48
|
|
