|
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/05/03/upshot/the-best-and-worst-places-to-grow-up-how-your-area-compares.html?abt=0002&abg=1 Be sure to zoom out and look at the country as a whole. Its almost as if this graph has a lot of red (bad) in one concentrated area. I'm not a geography expert so I will have to withold judgement. Perhaps goons can help identify this troubling region! Also it looks like...yes...is it true....yeah, all the blue (good) is concentrated around a particular state in the middle. SO STRANGE. Post your stats ITT to learn about economic mobility! Unless its in that red region, that would be bad and embarassing.
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 11:00 |
|
|
in a caravan, thread over
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:38
|
|
|
lorn Wayne posted:in a caravan, thread over 
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 19:41
|
|
|
I'm surprised goons aren't taking this golden opportunity to learn about social mobility. Guess Caramel Machiattos are more important, smdh.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 21:35
|
|
|
Jastiger posted:I'm surprised goons aren't taking this golden opportunity to learn about social mobility. Guess Caramel Machiattos are more important, smdh. Show us a heat map of macchiato sales around the country cross referenced with skinny jeans sales and we'll talk chumbo.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 21:58
|
|
|
we should have just let the south go imo
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 22:01
|
|
|
Why does the OP hate places with black people?
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
lorn Wayne posted:Show us a heat map of macchiato sales around the country cross referenced with skinny jeans sales and we'll talk chumbo. Where would you even find that.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 22:15
|
|
|
I don't understand how the map has all the wealthiest futures in these podunk, sparsely populated agrarian regions like central Montana and Iowa.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 22:42
|
|
|
Flesh Forge posted:I don't understand how the map has all the wealthiest futures in these podunk, sparsely populated agrarian regions like central Montana and Iowa. http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3715950 This is why. Quality cities.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 22:45
|
|
|
Flesh Forge posted:I don't understand how the map has all the wealthiest futures in these podunk, sparsely populated agrarian regions like central Montana and Iowa. Methamphetamine is a multibillion dollar business.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 23:14
|
|
|
Does this page track your location and zoom in on where you live when you load it?
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 23:19
|
|
|
I don't understand what this graph is tracking. It says my place is bad for social mobility, but if I'm not poor that's a good thing for me right? Or at least a non-issue?
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2015 23:21
|
|
|
mdm posted:Does this page track your location and zoom in on where you live when you load it? It does. Be sure to zoom out. Kleen_TheRowdyDog posted:I don't understand what this graph is tracking. It tracks mobility as far as how much money it'd take for the children in a poor area to come out ahead in the future and based on that amount, assigns a value. I don't think its really the best metric, but can be a good macro look at what kinds of opportunities are in an area, and what kinds of patterns exist in regions.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2015 03:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 11:00 |
|
|
This chart seems to somehow negatively correlate with abstinence only sex ed. Go figure.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2015 02:50
|
|