|
2013 Seahawks should be the obvious choice (especially if Harvin is healthy the whole season in this universe), although I'd be willing to hear arguments for 2005 or 1983. I'd go run-heavy for 2013, but pass-heavy if you use 2005.
|
#
¿
May 16, 2015 22:49
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 00:23 |
|
|
TubeStank posted:2011 Packers - pass heavy Fenrir posted:Ehhh... I dunno. I'd almost rather take the 1996 team. Pass Heavy. If it's a choice between Aaron Rodgers' prime and Brett Favre Prime Funslinging Bullshit then son, I don't think that's a choice at all.
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
IIRC the '96 team also had a real running game instead of trying to make James Starks a thing
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2015 23:03
|
|
|
Marshawn Lynch, with 2 catches for 17 yards, was our leading receiver 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2015 16:50
|
|
|
Silly Burrito posted:I am starting to doubt the validity of this site.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2015 20:46
|
|
|
I love this universe where Golden Tate plays for both teams in the same game 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2015 04:10
|
|
|
Steven Hauschka for MVP
|
|
#
¿
Jun 11, 2015 02:47
|
|
|
Who the gently caress keeps letting the goddamn Rams win
|
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2015 21:02
|
|
|
Man gently caress the Steelers
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2015 06:05
|
|
|
An 8-8 finish would be an appropriate throwback to Seahawk teams of yore even though this team was supposed to be better
|
|
#
¿
Jun 28, 2015 20:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 00:23 |
|
|
Hawks go 9-7 and miss the playoffs, my childhood is alive and well
|
|
#
¿
Jul 27, 2015 20:27
|
|