|
North Africa
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2015 07:29
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 17:52 |
|
|
A. Middle East, to tie off what the previous stand-alone mission started.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2015 02:32
|
|
|
b. Caucasus, to continue with the previous scenario in the Middle East.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 10, 2015 07:11
|
|
|
Yeah, that was an inane bullshit AI finish. This scenario needs another go sometime in the future.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2015 08:34
|
|
|
b. Kharkov
|
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2015 23:18
|
|
|
B. Husky, it would be a good follow-up to the last battle given that they are linked on the campaign tree.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 27, 2015 05:35
|
|
|
C, D-Day
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2016 01:43
|
|
|
Kangra posted:And so much for the idea that the AI knows how to use ports correctly... (or maybe they just really wanted to keep England safe). Well, if they can't fight you over there they'll be fighting you over here 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2016 07:47
|
|
|
The I look at it, having held out for so long at St. Lo would give you plenty of time to have your forces at Bayeux move down to hit the Americans in the rear, thus trapping the them in a pocket that they wouldn't be able to escape from (especially given that at this point your minor units can retake the rest of the coastal cities). You wouldn't have many reserves left, and you almost certainly couldn't hold the beaches against a second, more determined invasion but you've killed enough Americans and British that it would buy Germany precious time to move forces west in preparation for the next invasion (would the failure at Normandy convince the Allies to try for Calais or Brittany, next?). Still, good job, Herr General 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2016 19:05
|
|
|
C, and not just because the Battle of the Bulge is a fun thing to see played out, but also because fighting entirely in winter and often while it's snowing makes for a very different gameplay experience than usual.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2016 05:00
|
|
|
Kangra, will you be doing the Lake Balaton scenario? It's such a good follow up to this scenario in terms of difficulty and scope (not to mention the effect on the campaign tree) that it feels like it should be covered.
zetamind2000 fucked around with this message at 05:56 on Jun 3, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
Kangra, are you going to be posting the victory text screen for this scenario when you've finished it? Just asking because it's one of the endpoint scenarios so it would be cool to see it.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2016 01:17
|
|
|
Good job, Kangra. Do you have a screenshot of the victory text, though?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 27, 2016 00:00
|
|
|
Kangra posted:Do you mean for Sealion? We get the victory over Britain text added to the intro for the next battle. It is just one sentence, like the message about beating the Soviets at the start of Sealion. If you meant for the one-offs like Ardennes, extracting the raw text is the best I can do without playing through the entire campaign (or hacking the game). I meant the victory text for Sealion, so it's good that it's in the next battle intro text.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 27, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
Good job, Kangra! Some of the later missions seemed kind of dicey, but you managed to pull through to major victory each time. Now that the LP is over, will you be doing any of the other games in the series? Pacific General would make a great LP, if only to see how you handle the strangeness that is the Japanese campaign. It was ported to Windows 7 fairly recently, and it's available on GOG for $6 if I remember correctly.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 29, 2016 06:05
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 17:52 |
|
|
Go with Pacific General and the first option, that process worked very well for both Allied General and this game.
zetamind2000 fucked around with this message at 10:40 on Aug 30, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Aug 30, 2016 04:10
|
|