|
that goal was cool as h*ck
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 20:08 |
|
|
JoelJoel posted:Lol, nice one, Crawford. High glove side is the bane of his existence
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:31
|
|
|
I wish the Hawks had scored first
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:31
|
|
|
It begins.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:31
|
|
|
Oh man that's a corner pick if ever there was one
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:31
|
|
|
sustr and carle are not good. I like how there's only like 7 good defenseman in this entire Stanley cup finals.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:32
|
|
|
Kevlar v2.0 posted:High glove side is the bane of his existence Yeah, I thought it was a real Crawford goal at first glance, but it was closer to his ear than I initially though. Still, maybe challenge a bit with a lone man coming in with two D men on the way. E: Hedman owns.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:33
|
|
|
Wonderllama posted:sustr and carle are not good. I like how there's only like 7 good defenseman in this entire Stanley cup finals. Sustr is decent and can only get better, Carle sucks and is old.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:35
|
|
|
How do you miss that?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:35
|
|
|
HOW DO YOU MISS THAT!
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:35
|
|
|
Lol Hossa
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:35
|
|
|
HOSSA 
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:35
|
|
|
Hossa... how do you miss that
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:35
|
|
|
Good work, old man hosssa.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
Oh my goodness
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
Hhahahahaa way to miss that you dumbos.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
HOSSA  goal saving clutch trip
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
Holy poo poo bishop, what was that?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
hooooooly poo poo if there was ever a good penalty to take
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
About time they called a penalty
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
lolll saad is so goddamn dumb.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
Lol 4v4
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:36
|
|
|
4 on 4 after that? What the poo poo?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
Great. So they didn't even get a PP out of it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
Ughhh
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
YESSSSSSS IT'S FOUR-ON-FOUR BECAUSE SAAD IS A loving MORON
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
hahaha 4 on 4 gently caress yo PP
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
Wait I missed it, what was the call on the Hawks?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
Big Ben got a horseshoe up his rear end tonight.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
Hahaha, my beer league goalie did that last night. Except the other team was better than Hossa and buried the completely open net shot.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
Hawks just missing empty nets now
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
This game already owns like last game. What a shame so many people are missing this
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:38
|
|
|
Kevlar v2.0 posted:4 on 4 after that? What the poo poo?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:38
|
|
|
JoelJoel posted:Big Ben got a horseshoe up his rear end tonight. gotta plug it up tonight
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:38
|
|
|
Bishop looking just a little rattled after that
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:38
|
|
|
The way BHAS talks about the PP I bet they prefer 4v4
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:38
|
|
|
shaw must be hungry again
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:38
|
|
|
They should probably pull Bishop now before this turns into a blowout
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:39
|
|
|
tofes posted:They should probably pull Bishop now before this turns into a blowout Tampa will still win, because Chicago can't score on an open goal
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 20:08 |
|
|
Rotten Cookies posted:The way BHAS talks about the PP I bet they prefer 4v4 If anyone could complain about the PP, it's HAS
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2015 01:40
|
|