|
It is pretty legitimately lovely to discuss a major unmarked plot spoiler in the thread for an unreleased game, regardless of the actual context of the spoiler.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 04:58 |
|
|
# ? May 3, 2024 11:02 |
|
Soooo what about that Final Fantasy 7 remake edit: wrong thread damnit
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:04 |
|
{spoikler]batman is bruce wane[/spoilers]
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:30 |
|
There's a full leak of details on 4chan I'm reading through now. I'll avoid posting the whole thing since I don't want to ruin the story for anyone who cares, but I can confirm some villains. Man-Bat, Deacon Blackfire, Deathstroke, Professor Pyg, Hush And villains who apparently aren't in the game. Bane, Ra's al Ghul, Calendar Man Blueberry Pancakes fucked around with this message at 05:38 on Jun 20, 2015 |
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:31 |
|
See this game can have all the dumb plot point it wants, all those villains (if they're actual active villains to handle and not just 'oooh see look he's in the crowd shot') are dudes I'm super into being in the game.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:32 |
|
MORE SPOILERS Oh, gently caress you Rocksteady
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:35 |
|
I just think it's hilarious Rocksteady just absolutely could not have a game without the joker.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:35 |
|
A. Beaverhausen posted:I just think it's hilarious Rocksteady just absolutely could not have a game without the joker. He is the center of the DC Universe,as has been stated before. DC probably mandated it.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:37 |
Hobgoblin2099 posted:There's a full leak of details on 4chan I'm reading through now. I'll avoid posting the whole thing since I don't want to ruin the story for anyone who cares, but I can confirm some villains. Those all are awesome, really glad they're in the game.
|
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:37 |
|
I can see where rocksteady could argue following the letter of the rules if not the spirit. Arkham knight is an original character. We didn't say anything about the person inside. Joker is dead. Doesn't mean he can't influence the story.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:42 |
|
Aquasnake posted:I can see where rocksteady could argue following the letter of the rules if not the spirit. Arkham knight is an original character. We didn't say anything about the person inside. Joker is dead. Doesn't mean he can't influence the story. Considering the number of people bitching about joker fatigue in the arkham thread, it is extremely lazy. I.E. Jason but gently caress it, writing is dead.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:44 |
|
Dark_Tzitzimine posted:MORE SPOILERS Is this Jason Todd, or Ashley Todd?
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:45 |
|
Aquasnake posted:I can see where rocksteady could argue following the letter of the rules if not the spirit. Arkham knight is an original character. We didn't say anything about the person inside. Joker is dead. Doesn't mean he can't influence the story. It's just such a dumb little 'nyaaa see we said it like this so we didn't lie' thing though. Like, constantly saying "The Knight is a brand new character, never seen before, never written about, no backstory" (I'm literally taking these statements from past videos) and then having the big 'twist' be 'no it was the guy you all expected who has a TON of history and backstory, but he's USING A DIFFERENT NAME is just so lazy. That's not a twist, you just lied. If I put on a murder mystery thing and say 'now I can tell you for sure it ISN'T the butler' and then at the end I go 'it's the butler, but no see he's actually a secret KGB agent we never hinted at before this moment, so technically he isn't 'the butler' at all!' that's not me being clever. Like, I'm still into this game super hard, the mechanics look awesome and it has a ton of cool poo poo, but this is just such a lovely bad comic book twist. Also the 'Joker's dead but not gone' was a neat element...a game ago...now it's just a rehash.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:49 |
|
Mr E posted:Those all are awesome, really glad they're in the game. In regards to Deathstroke, though, he's apparently a Batmobile boss.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 05:51 |
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Also the 'Joker's dead but not gone' was a neat element...a game ago...now it's just a rehash. A... game ago where The Joker died at the end of the game and the only game since then was a prequel made by a different development team?
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 06:37 |
|
You're criticizing a facet of a game I like? H...how dare you
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 06:47 |
|
Jason Todd looks like a loving dork with that J branded on his face. Not that he doesn't look like one normally, but still. The Arkham Knight design was cool and I'm a bit disappointed that it was used on this reveal. The Joker stuff is all stupid and dumb, lol.
Captain Baal fucked around with this message at 06:53 on Jun 20, 2015 |
# ? Jun 20, 2015 06:48 |
|
Eurogamer is working on a tech rundown of Arkham Knight on PS4. This is their early judgment:Digital Foundry posted:It's a sad fact that this generation's big releases are often playing catch-up on their promises post-launch - a "release now, fix later" mentality that developer Rocksteady thankfully doesn't appear to subscribe to in its excellent Batman Arkham Knight. Having played the PlayStation 4 review code extensively, we're pleased to see the game is set to launch in a very refined, polished state. As the finale to the Arkham saga, it's a superb production, but crucially it also turns in a slick, stable playing experience with solid performance on day one. They sound very excited about the game itself, too, but are still working on a review.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 08:52 |
|
Dark_Tzitzimine posted:MORE SPOILERS lmao this game is going to own
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 08:57 |
|
A. Beaverhausen posted:You're criticizing a facet of a game I like? H...how dare you This is some chickenshit garbage that I could easily turn around. You said something stupid, deal with it.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 09:14 |
|
Played for a couple hours tonight and really, really digging it. This is my first Arkham game (which is sad, as I'm a huge DC fan) and I love how I don't have to loot anything, there's no ammo or charges to keep track of, etc. Just move from one puzzle/fight to the next. They telegraph the Knight's identity within the first meeting with him, though. That was kinda disappointing.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 11:30 |
|
I'm glad I got a code for this with my video card. I look forward to punching goons to death.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 11:42 |
|
Dark_Tzitzimine posted:MORE SPOILERS Wait, why the gently caress is he doing all this when Batman technically killed the Joker? The only way their initial post revival rivalry worked is because Joker was still alive and out of all the people Batman should have been the one to either avenge him or save countless victims from putting down one stupid clown. Shouldn't he be happy he's nothing more than ash now? Ville Valo posted:Played for a couple hours tonight and really, really digging it. This is my first Arkham game (which is sad, as I'm a huge DC fan) and I love how I don't have to loot anything, there's no ammo or charges to keep track of, etc. Just move from one puzzle/fight to the next. Yeah, it's rather obvious who he could be if you knew anything about comics, but it sort of doesn't work now.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 12:17 |
|
I still can't believe they didn't do the raddest thing and have Knight turn out to be insane Bruce Wayne and have you turn out to have been Dick Grayson or Jason Todd the whole time. Also LMAO at the Joker presence and impact on the game here, seriously?
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 12:22 |
|
Neo Rasa posted:I still can't believe they didn't do the raddest thing and have Knight turn out to be insane Bruce Wayne and have you turn out to have been Dick Grayson or Jason Todd the whole time. But Nightwing was already confirmed. Unless you thought Nightwing would be Jason Todd, but I think his outfit was red. Nevermind, it was blue.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 12:26 |
|
Hobgoblin2099 posted:But Nightwing was already confirmed. Unless you thought Nightwing would be Jason Todd, but I think his outfit is usually red. Oh my God.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 12:27 |
|
ImpAtom posted:It is pretty legitimately lovely to discuss a major unmarked plot spoiler in the thread for an unreleased game, regardless of the actual context of the spoiler. Seriously. Maybe they're being "ironically" lovely about it, but that's still pretty dickish. Oh well.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 12:29 |
|
Kill all gamers imo http://imgur.com/pR5qRbc
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 12:34 |
|
Neo Rasa posted:Kill all gamers imo You kill yourself first. Everyone will follow, I promise.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 12:45 |
|
poptart_fairy posted:Seriously. Maybe they're being "ironically" lovely about it, but that's still pretty dickish. Oh well. Lmfao.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 12:46 |
|
poptart_fairy posted:Seriously. Maybe they're being "ironically" lovely about it, but that's still pretty dickish. Oh well. No, everyone's being unironically lovely, it's the new cool thing at SA (gently caress those spoilers sound lame as gently caress tho the writing is garbage anyway it's super hard to give a poo poo)
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 13:36 |
|
ImpAtom posted:A... game ago where The Joker died at the end of the game and the only game since then was a prequel made by a different development team? Considering it's the literal exact same plot point, yes? Like "THE JOKER IS DYING/DEAD BUT HIS CELLS LIVE ON" was a cool little twist on 'comic book death' in City, but doing the exact same thing again in Knight is kinda a lame rehash to go to. If they want to keep some kind of Joker around there's other ways to do it. Injustice has a whole Joker wannabe thing going on, maybe with Gotham so horribly hosed in the Arkham series there's a whole creepy 'Joker Cult' going on or something. Boom, you get a painted clown freak, you can even have a boss fight where like, multiple 'Jokers' maybe with allusions to previous versions are trying to bring you down, and you don't need to use the exact same plot point as your last game. I don't care that they're bringing Joker back, when I heard they still had Hamill on staff for it I knew they weren't gonna bring that dude in for just a couple audio-logs, just use new plot points for it.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 14:15 |
|
Knuc U Kinte posted:You kill yourself first. Everyone will follow, I promise. Sorry I spoiled your wedding plans.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 17:07 |
|
The PC specs are comparable to Witcher 3 specs, right
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 18:03 |
|
DOOP posted:The PC specs are comparable to Witcher 3 specs, right I loving hope so, because then I could squeak by with under minimum specs and play this glorious trainwreck of a campaign. I also hope that AMD comes out with updated drivers sooner than they did W3.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 18:05 |
|
Hakkesshu posted:No, everyone's being unironically lovely, it's the new cool thing at SA Well sure, but it's nice being able to piece together this sort of thing by yourself rather than someone doing a low effort troll and just outright slapping into a thread, y'know?
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 18:31 |
|
Pirate Jet posted:This is some chickenshit garbage that I could easily turn around. You said something stupid, deal with it. Come at me bro E: yeah, looks like you weren't even in the conversation so... A. Beaverhausen fucked around with this message at 19:35 on Jun 20, 2015 |
# ? Jun 20, 2015 19:33 |
|
DOOP posted:The PC specs are comparable to Witcher 3 specs, right AMD just released their new video cards, buy a new computer.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 20:09 |
|
Got the season pass off of Steam for $30, should I be feeling buyer's remorse already? Kinda seems like at least the DLC this time might provide some more substance than the previous games but is it even worth it?
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 23:06 |
|
|
# ? May 3, 2024 11:02 |
|
Mr. Funktastic posted:Got the season pass off of Steam for $30, should I be feeling buyer's remorse already? Kinda seems like at least the DLC this time might provide some more substance than the previous games but is it even worth it? I mean paying $30 for something as vague as a season pass is not really the best idea. Who knows, you might be loving sick of the game before you're even done with it.
|
# ? Jun 20, 2015 23:10 |