|
The entire game will take place during Night 0.
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 07:05 |
|
|
I'm posting in this thread while making GBS threads
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:00
|
|
|
anyway  is the scum
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:00
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:I'm posting in this thread while making GBS threads i'm making GBS threads in this thread while posting
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:01
|
|
|
##vote nolynch
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:##vote nolynch Taste alt account spotted.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:08
|
|
|
Asiina posted:Taste alt account spotted. lol
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:13
|
|
|
##vote big nothing Policy vote
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:13
|
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:I was just trying to get confirmation on that because a mafia vig isn't very likely, but getting lucky with a n0 event seems more plausible. This is a very bad vote. "I would believe you were town if you said it was a vig you owned but since you found it clearly you are scum"????? I don't get this logic at all. Explain.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:19
|
|
|
If he claimed vig then I would remain suspicious of him but it would still be an alibi. An untested and unproven alibi, but still better than nothing. Finding a gun and shooting it means he has no alibi for an extremely anti-town action. Also all this white noise posting makes it hard to actually get a day 1 read so this is the only real thing I have right now.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:21
|
|
|
Why is shooting someone anti-town? Why did you respond to my comment on your vote being bad almost immediately?
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:22
|
|
|
Because I saw it when I was reading through the thread? I see a question aimed at me, and I answer it. Shooting a random person is an anti-town action because chances are that you are harming your own team. The only people who would know that they're not harming their own team would be those who know who they're allied with, aka scum.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:25
|
|
|
But flips give us information to go off of. Knowledge is power for town. You'd make a valid argument of "to shoot so early gives us absolutely nothing but a laugh and that intent is scummy", buuuuuut that isn't what you're saying. ##vote SirSamVimes
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:27
|
|
|
Its not like you can get a vig and not use it immediately. I'm usually a high priority target for scum because of my rhetoric and intense content, so I need to use one-shots immediately.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:29
|
|
|
So you think that random vigging is a pro-town action because we know what the dead person is? If we were late enough in the game that people were making cases against each other then I'd understand that view, seeing as a town flip would give us cause to look at people making cases against them more closely but what do we gain from knowing that Hiipfire was a vanilla townie?
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:31
|
|
|
imgay posted:Its not like you can get a vig and not use it immediately. I'm usually a high priority target for scum because of my rhetoric and intense content, so I need to use one-shots immediately. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:31
|
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:So you think that random vigging is a pro-town action because we know what the dead person is? If we were late enough in the game that people were making cases against each other then I'd understand that view, seeing as a town flip would give us cause to look at people making cases against them more closely but what do we gain from knowing that Hiipfire was a vanilla townie? Ah yes, the argument I said you should have been making earlier, which accompanied my vote for you.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:32
|
|
|
The fact that you accompany "knowledge is power" with an argument against "knowledge is power" doesn't make me saying it any less valid.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:34
|
|
|
What is this vanilla town bullshit in this game of bullshit mafia
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:46
|
|
|
So, let me see if I have this right. imgay gets a gun, fires it not even two pages into day one despite the high odds of it hitting a townie, and in fact hits a townie. Doesn't wait for a read, doesn't wait for anything even resembling evidence, just picks a random target. If that had been me and I had done that, I would be getting my rear end jumped about my rookie mistake, or you would be assuming I'm scum I guarantee. Quid has only piped in to defend that one action. He jumped me, now he's jumping Vimes, and is in fact voting Vimes because ????, I don't see how processing what imgay did as suspicious is scummy. Imgay killed a townie under the guise of loljokephase, it was either very stupid town or very blatant scum, and I'm not sure why calling this out is getting railed so hard. If imgay does come out as scum, this is looking like strong evidence Quid and Asiina are in cahoots with him. The only thing to bring Quid out of hiding has been the issue of imgay offing town.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:48
|
|
|
I wouldn't shoot you, you new
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:51
|
|
|
Also, knowledge isn't power when the only knowledge we picked up was "a townie is dead." Firing without anything to go on was a terrible gamble, if it was a gamble at all.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:52
|
|
|
The only possibility that renders it as not a gamble would be if imgay knew who not to shoot, such as his scumpals.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:53
|
|
|
Lunatic Sledge posted:Also, knowledge isn't power when the only knowledge we picked up was "a townie is dead." Firing without anything to go on was a terrible gamble, if it was a gamble at all. you making it sound like i randomly picked a dude, i just wanted to kill hiipfire
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:54
|
|
|
Again, if the argument you made had been "it was a waste of a shot to do it so early," that would be valid. Your argument was "he shot, therefore he scummy because shooting is scummy." That's a disingenuous argument, thus I vote.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:57
|
|
|
Lunatic Sledge posted:it was either very stupid town To be fair, this is imgay in a few words Quid jumped on SSV because his first argument was that using the vig was extremely anti town. His explanation about why it was anti town was that it was anti town because chances are you are harming your own team. Well, yeah, if there were more scum than town the game would be over. Any vig, no matter who uses it or how they got it, has a higher percentage chance of hitting town than scum. That argument is fundamentally different than "Shooting someone so early D1 is bad."
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:58
|
|
|
No, I said shooting day 1 was anti town.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
imgay posted:you making it sound like i randomly picked a dude, i just wanted to kill hiipfire Seems legit, who else would you have killed if hiipfire wasn't playing?
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
Shooting before there has been any reads or any leads or any information is anti town.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:Shooting before there has been any reads or any leads or any information is anti town. That is not what you said. You are trying to paint it as if it was now, which is very scummy.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 04:00
|
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:I feel like randomly killing off a player day 1 is a pretty scummy move. SirSamVimes posted:D1 vigs are neither cool nor good when they're not even based on any reads.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 04:01
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:To be fair, this is imgay in a few words Who do you think is scum tho
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 04:02
|
|
|
probably jon joe
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 04:02
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:That is not what you said. You are trying to paint it as if it was now, which is very scummy. SirSamVimes posted:I feel like randomly killing off a player day 1 is a pretty scummy move. SirSamVimes posted:D1 vigs are neither cool nor good when they're not even based on any reads. These are Vimes' first two posts on the subject. If "randomly killing off a player" doesn't mean "killing them without a read or evidence," then I don't know what "randomly killing a player" means. Vimes' argument hasn't changed.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 04:03
|
|
|
MC Eating Disorder posted:Who do you think is scum tho  Workin on it, chief
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 04:03
|
|
|
the gently caress is jon joe anyways
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 04:03
|
|
|
Like, there isn't even that many posts to be able to misinterpret, but Quid man you're trying really hard to twist it all away from imgay, even when you admitted there's ways to look at this that paint imgay in a bad light. Phrasing those ways badly isn't scummy, it's just that--bad phrasing. You are really committed to defending imgay, though, even when only one or two people go after him.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 04:04
|
|
|
I accept "imgay makes bad decisions" as a valid defense, but Quid and Asiina trying to shut down anybody that raises an eye to imgay makes my spider sense tingle.
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 04:06
|
|
|
Quid is just white knighting me right now
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 04:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 07:05 |
|
|
Hey let's vote for quid ##vote quid
|
|
#
?
Jul 27, 2015 04:07
|
|