|
At best that's 3 life and 3 mana to get two cards, and requires you to play a three-colour deck. That seems... really bad! Don't do it, Bernie, it's a trap card!
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 21:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 01:47 |
|
|
GlyphGryph posted:At best that's 3 life and 3 mana to get two cards, and requires you to play a three-colour deck. That seems... really bad! Don't do it, Bernie, it's a trap card! Nah, it's a pretty good card. Drawing three cards normally costs 2UU, and black draw cards are decent at 3B for the same effect. I wouldn't be shocked if it was run, especially with a new form of true dual land in the current set and the allied colour fetches currently in print.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
Hodgepodge posted:Nah, it's a pretty good card. Drawing three cards normally costs 2UU, and black draw cards are decent at 3B for the same effect. I wouldn't be shocked if it was run, especially with a new form of true dual land in the current set and the allied colour fetches currently in print. Yeah but losing 3 life just to use one less mana drawing?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:Yeah but losing 3 life just to use one less mana drawing? And in another colour, yes. Normally, black still loses the life even at 3B.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 22:33
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:Yeah but losing 3 life just to use one less mana drawing? The going rate people are pretty satisfied playing is 1B and paying 2 life to draw 2 cards.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2015 22:33
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2015 02:29
|
|
|
That seems really powerful. Too much so for the Republican house.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2015 03:26
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:That seems really powerful. Too much so for the Republican house. You still have to pay for the replacement
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2015 03:38
|
|
|
Istvun posted:You still have to pay for the replacement Oooooh.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2015 03:47
|
|
|
This is excellent, thematically. (A friend who knows more about M:tG than I do suggests a more succinct phrasing would be: "You may cast a card in your hand with converted mana cost greater than or equal to target spell. If you do, counter that spell.")
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2015 04:14
|
|
|
 Occultatio posted:This is excellent, thematically. It's in the spirit of old cards with super clunky wordings. vyelkin fucked around with this message at 14:58 on Sep 17, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2015 14:53
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2015 15:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2015 18:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2015 21:28
|
|
|
Gorgeous
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2015 23:33
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2015 00:15
|
|
|
Close the entire internet. It's over.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2015 02:19
|
|
|
This is amazing. Less amazing, but I already made it so whatever: 
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2015 03:33
|
|
|
Okay, just reading the design file now... Whelp. Okay real post:  In case you haven't noticed, I basically just try to make playable EDH commanders half the time 
Hodgepodge fucked around with this message at 09:23 on Sep 18, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2015 08:20
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2015 09:22
|
|
|
In which I make a prediction:
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2015 10:05
|
|
|
Moar cadrs:  
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2015 10:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2015 11:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2015 13:20
|
|
|
I don't know how to play Magic, but lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2015 14:41
|
|
|
I made a mechanic:  Basically the idea is that if something happens to make the spell you are casting undesirable (usually a counterspell in competitive play) you can "switch positions" and cast the Pivot spell instead. Enchantments also have a "policy" flavour, and making auras better is usually a good thing anyhow and gives the mechanic some versatility.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 15:19
|
|
|
Also, awhile back someone asked for commons:   Commons are kind of boring
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 15:32
|
|
|
I went to the trouble of downloading a set editor to make this because all the online ones make split mana look ugly as El Rushbo:
Hodgepodge fucked around with this message at 16:30 on Sep 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 16:26
|
|
|
 I wanted to try my hand at a common legend. Too complex? Edit: the original concept was for a hybrid w/b w/b, but there weren't hybrid card borders. Feel free to copy this in hybrid mana if that feels right to you.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 16:42
|
|
|
Legendary never shows up at common rarity. They try to keep commons as straightforward as possible. Phyrexian mana may capture the flavour you're going for anyhow, though.  e: It feels wrong to not credit Dees for his work 
Hodgepodge fucked around with this message at 17:03 on Sep 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 16:55
|
|
|
I... used phyrexian mana.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 17:07
|
|
|
Ignite Memories posted:I... used phyrexian mana. It's okay. The phyrexian ethos is a good fit for today's society. I see big things in your future. Another card type I've wanted to do for awhile: 
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 17:29
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2015 17:48
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2015 05:17
|
|
|
Hodgepodge posted:Moar cadrs: this is outstandingly outstanding
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2015 05:57
|
|
|
also this
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2015 05:59
|
|
|
crazy cloud posted:this is outstandingly outstanding Thank you. Have an old school communist octopus: 
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2015 06:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2015 06:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 01:47 |
|
|
    
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2015 14:18
|
|