Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Camrath
Mar 19, 2004

The UKMT Fudge Baron


I have to admit, I've not had the best impression of the SCA from my limited experience- which is odd, because as a dedicated LARPer our interests should align pretty well.

I used to run a LARP fighting club in London, which started getting some SCA members coming along. Which is great, nerdy combat sports are a broad church and so on. Except that almost to a man the SCA people looked down on those LARP fighting, mocked them pretty openly and were just generally horribly smug, aloof and elitist to deal with. End result- all the LARP fighting died off and now the club is entirely people doing armoured combat drills. I gave up earlier this year as spending an evening being patronised for doing 'the wrong sort' of fake combat got seriously loving old.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Goobers For Guts
Jul 17, 2007
I do personally know several laurel level artisans who DO go to overwhelming extents to be as authentic as possible. Fiber laurels who raise sheep in wattle fences, shear them, comb the wool, rove it, spin it on a great wheel or drop spindle, dye it with woad or natural period dyes, then weave it on a period loom. Scribes that stretch goat skin and make period pigments and experiment with period glue recipes for gold leafing. I am regularly impressed by the quality research and dedication the artisans in the SCA put into their chosen field. I've seen SCA participating laurels get published in many journals on historical arts and sciences. I know of one lady who actually changed the history books on whether cotton was utilized in Europe on the same level as linen, hemp, and wool. She researched ships records to see the quantities of fiber brought over from the New World. Another who is translating a very old German cook book in a lost dialect. It goes on an on.

The SCA is a 501 c-3 non profit. That is not something you gain status for by just dressing up like a jester and going to ren faires. It's based on the legitimate educational and historical research done on the Arts and Sciences. Not as much the fighting since it is done with rattan for insurance reasons. Therefore it cannot be historical.

Goobers For Guts
Jul 17, 2007

Camrath posted:

I have to admit, I've not had the best impression of the SCA from my limited experience- which is odd, because as a dedicated LARPer our interests should align pretty well.

I used to run a LARP fighting club in London, which started getting some SCA members coming along. Which is great, nerdy combat sports are a broad church and so on. Except that almost to a man the SCA people looked down on those LARP fighting, mocked them pretty openly and were just generally horribly smug, aloof and elitist to deal with. End result- all the LARP fighting died off and now the club is entirely people doing armoured combat drills. I gave up earlier this year as spending an evening being patronised for doing 'the wrong sort' of fake combat got seriously loving old.

I have seen this all too often. And I do not condone that attitude. I have heard remarks from other SCA members watching LARPers at Cons, and I don't think it's really their place. I have done both. And honestly, the LARP folks are having tons of fun doing their thing and they all come over and hang out with us and we admire each others setups. To each their own. We all like to have fun in different ways.

Mr. Wiggles
Dec 1, 2003

We are all drinking from the highball glass of ideology.

Verisimilidude posted:

Seriously, if someone is hitting someone so hard (with rattan of all things) that they're breaking limbs they're hitting WAY too hard. Historical combat didn't even involve swinging for the fences, unless you're role playing as some kind of buffel.


That's how hard we always hit in caid and the west. That's just the way it's done. It's fun.

Siivola
Dec 23, 2012

Well it certainly forces the receiver to admit the blow. :v: "Nay, 'tis but a scratch!"

Mr. Wiggles
Dec 1, 2003

We are all drinking from the highball glass of ideology.
People who talk like that get hit harder.

Liquid Communism
Mar 9, 2004


Out here, everything hurts.




Mr. Wiggles posted:

That's how hard we always hit in caid and the west. That's just the way it's done. It's fun.

It's all fun and games until someone gets crippled because they needed to prove how big their dick is by rhinohiding.

Mr. Wiggles
Dec 1, 2003

We are all drinking from the highball glass of ideology.
Sic ludo pugnae est.

Pixelante
Mar 16, 2006

You people will by God act like a team, or at least like people who know each other, or I'll incinerate the bunch of you here and now.

curious lump posted:

this describes the SCA perfectly. anyone who uses it for anything but fighting should be put to death

Sorry for shining the worst light on it, but I've tried to engage with the SCA community in three different cities--I was a History major with a focus in wars for my first degree--and always wanted it to be better than I found it. I think it suffers from the same problem the Burning Man monster has; regional groups take on the flavour of their most active and involved members. One city might be rhino-hiding machoism, another might be waaaaay into authenticity ("her dress would have been so pretty if she hadn't used polyester thread! Ew!"), and I'm hopeful there are some who are just chill, inclusive, and having a lot of fun playing. The stuff that the SCA does and makes and studies are great. The people who remember that it's a game are fantastic. It's the people who forget that it's about doing and just start being it who go right up their own asses until they can't hear the world outside. So... largely the upper echelons of court.

But I just described almost every time-consuming, social, and expensive hobby ever so welp.

(Horses are also expensive and time-consuming so if you pile that on the SCA I seriously don't know when you'd sleep. My family kept horses and even modern tack is a pain to keep in shape.)

Pixelante fucked around with this message at 23:02 on Sep 30, 2015

curious lump
Sep 13, 2014

by zen death robot

I guess I'm just bitter over my local SCA. For the most part, they're wierd neckbeards and people who think they're better than others because they've been working on their beer belly with the same 10 people for the past decade. The fighters are mostly pretty nice though, although a lot of them tend to think they're better than they are.

Goobers For Guts
Jul 17, 2007

Pixelante posted:

Sorry for shining the worst light on it, but I've tried to engage with the SCA community in three different cities--I was a History major with a focus in wars for my first degree--and always wanted it to be better than I found it. I think it suffers from the same problem the Burning Man monster has; regional groups take on the flavour of their most active and involved members. One city might be rhino-hiding machoism, another might be waaaaay into authenticity ("her dress would have been so pretty if she hadn't used polyester thread! Ew!"), and I'm hopeful there are some who are just chill, inclusive, and having a lot of fun playing. The stuff that the SCA does and makes and studies are great. The people who remember that it's a game are fantastic. It's the people who forget that it's about doing and just start being it who go right up their own asses until they can't hear the world outside. So... largely the upper echelons of court.

But I just described almost every time-consuming, social, and expensive hobby ever so welp.

(Horses are also expensive and time-consuming so if you pile that on the SCA I seriously don't know when you'd sleep. My family kept horses and even modern tack is a pain to keep in shape.)

This is a huge problem. And I have seen it society wide. I consider myself fortunate I live in a great barony of people who work hard, but play hard too and know that it's really a game and we are out there to have fun. And yes, sometimes we are looked down on because "We don't take the SCA seriously enough." But hey, we have some of the most talented artisans, musical talents, fighters and cooks in the kingdom. So take that for what you will.

As far as the horses, we use modern tack. Though I would love to construct a legit period saddle. The expense is hauling the animals to primitive sites and setting up temporary enclosures for the duration of the event. We haul water, feed animals, and muck paddocks when we aren't in a tourney. So we do miss out on some of the fun stuff. I love non equestrian inclusive events sometimes because I don't have to babysit my horses.

Pixelante
Mar 16, 2006

You people will by God act like a team, or at least like people who know each other, or I'll incinerate the bunch of you here and now.
Most of the toxic stuff I saw at Pennsic only crossed my line of sight because I'd been dropped in the midst of one of the oldest, most established groups that was full of former kings/queens, laurels, and knights--they had eyes and ears in everything. They really enjoyed gossiping, and all the dirt was mercilessly combed through every time you got two or more of them sitting at the same table or camp fire. I always walked away feeling a bit disappointed, or with a strong sense of, "no, that's wrong--this is just a game." (ie. the former queen bowing to her ex-husband's new wife, while their daughter preferred being with dad because she was about 8 and liked being ~a real princess~.) Someone had moved to a different part of the province to put themselves in a different kingdom than an ex in the royal court. One of the kings was having a breakdown over loving up the alliances, which is why the armies were ridiculously unbalanced. I only heard that stuff because I was hanging out with high court folks who'd been attending Pennsic their whole lives. Gossip is what you do when there's no TV.

Other things were just weird. A girl got assaulted while walking alone one night, and in response, fighters started walking patrols in groups... which would be sweet if you didn't catch the white-knight glint in their eyes, how much they liked talking about it, and how that torch really looks like a club with fire on the end.

In defence of the event, our camp welcomed my boyfriend and I with loaned gear, advice, directions, and company. Their camp was as comfortable as you can get while still sleeping outside in dramatic weather (hot, rain, lightning, hot, freezing, hot...) I had some fantastic conversations, and we always felt welcome among them. Aside from the "A kingdom" wankery ("your king did porn!") it was a far cry from smaller regional groups that were more clique-y. Sure, a lot of people wanted to brag, but it was better than the aloof wariness of smaller groups who felt they had more to prove.

Our Pennsic friends joked about how everyone was bowing at folks dressed in high quality gear, because there were so many kingdoms represented that you couldn't just know the face of all the royals; our camp discussed dressing up the boyfriend and myself in the swaggest poo poo they could pull out of their trunks and behaving as our court for a stroll around the event to see how many people bowed. Sad we never did that.

tl:dr Pennsic has ruined me for every other SCA event ever. I started at the top, and it's all downhill from there.

Pixelante fucked around with this message at 23:48 on Oct 3, 2015

PaleIrishGuy
Feb 5, 2004
Pale as paper

Goobers For Guts posted:

I do personally know several laurel level artisans who DO go to overwhelming extents to be as authentic as possible. Fiber laurels who raise sheep in wattle fences, shear them, comb the wool, rove it, spin it on a great wheel or drop spindle, dye it with woad or natural period dyes, then weave it on a period loom. Scribes that stretch goat skin and make period pigments and experiment with period glue recipes for gold leafing. I am regularly impressed by the quality research and dedication the artisans in the SCA put into their chosen field. I've seen SCA participating laurels get published in many journals on historical arts and sciences. I know of one lady who actually changed the history books on whether cotton was utilized in Europe on the same level as linen, hemp, and wool. She researched ships records to see the quantities of fiber brought over from the New World. Another who is translating a very old German cook book in a lost dialect. It goes on an on.

The SCA is a 501 c-3 non profit. That is not something you gain status for by just dressing up like a jester and going to ren faires. It's based on the legitimate educational and historical research done on the Arts and Sciences. Not as much the fighting since it is done with rattan for insurance reasons. Therefore it cannot be historical.

Along these lines, myself and some others from my barony are prepping to make accurate as possible replicas of drinking vessels from the Mary Rose. To that end, I'm working on acquiring as many woodworking tools that are true to the early-mid 1500's as possible. Doing all that research and replication work to basically make museum quality pieces is fuckin great.




also: Draco Invictus.

Otto Von Jizzmark
Dec 27, 2004
Sounds like a larp

Pixelante
Mar 16, 2006

You people will by God act like a team, or at least like people who know each other, or I'll incinerate the bunch of you here and now.

PaleIrishGuy posted:

Along these lines, myself and some others from my barony are prepping to make accurate as possible replicas of drinking vessels from the Mary Rose. To that end, I'm working on acquiring as many woodworking tools that are true to the early-mid 1500's as possible. Doing all that research and replication work to basically make museum quality pieces is fuckin great.

I'm a crafty type of person (god help me I will resurrect my city's lantern festival if I have to do it out of my front yard) and the Arts and Sciences stuff was the carrot that kept bringing me back. I spent most of my Pennsic time in the workshop area, going from carving to wirecraft to silver working to whatever. That was a lot of fun and kept me pretty busy at what was technically a "war." The wars were all out in open fields in the blazing sun; Arts and Science were in shady tents. Also, there were at least two lectures on the history of mustard--by totally different historians. It was awesome. I'd rather slam my head in a car door a few dozen times than re-engage with my local group, but I've got a lot of respect for the folk who are studying their own projects, not what the guy next to them is wearing or loving. The dancing was a lot of fun to watch, but I learned not to trust the guy who's like, "it's two steps forward, three steps back, you'll figure out the rest up there." He's lying. (My boyfriends's autistic nephew was a goddamn master of dance, though. Everything is so structured that he thrived in the SCA, but had zero interest in fighting.)

It's larp-y in the sense that people pick an age and name that reflects the era they like, and there are always going to be cringe-worthy "m'lady" moments, but the fighting is pretty real. A lot of my problems with the SCA were that it was socially too real. People weren't worried about the persona of the king being suicidal--they were worried about the guy. Being a king or queen has a lot of real power because people want it to. Anyone who walks around saying poo poo like "forsooth!" is going to get sidelined pretty fast. Your persona mostly seems to just be the thing you hang your era and aesthetic on. Court might be different, but I dozed off for that crap.

I did ask if a woman could ever be King or a man could be Queen--and this was in about 2006--and got laughed at by the women in my camp. For one, you have to win tournaments to become King, which is mostly going to be men based on weight and strength. The queen is just whoever they're attached to. I persisted with, "okay, let's say there's some totally ripped chick who just rolls your guys and wins?" They shrugged like it could never happen, then explained to me that it was important that the queen be a woman because she was there to represent and support the women in the kingdom--if it was a man, women wouldn't be as comfortable talking to him. I was of the opinion that if you need the cable installer's wife to make you feel safe in that community, you should probably find another community. It was clearly a hard line, though, so I just shut up and added another tick to the "nope" list. Too real = too bullshit.

Sorry. I feel like I jacked this thread. I'd really like to hear more about the equestrian stuff because I never got to see any of that close up, and I used to be a hunter-jumper. I'd worry a lot about the safety of everything involved when it comes to jousting. I mean, getting knocked off the saddle is pretty dangerous, and that's sort of the goal of most mounted sparring, right?

Liquid Communism
Mar 9, 2004


Out here, everything hurts.




There's actually been a shitload of infighting over the issue of women in crown tourneys, specifically involving same-gender couples in leadership positions.

Interestingly, the Board of the organization indicated that they were hesitant to allow it because of the possibility of two skilled male fighters arranging to pass the crown back and forth.

If I remember correctly (it's been a few years since I was active), there's only been a single woman who's won a crown tourney by right of arms in 40+ years. Duchess Rowan Beatrice von Kampfer, who won Ansteorra's Crown tourney in 1990.

Pixelante
Mar 16, 2006

You people will by God act like a team, or at least like people who know each other, or I'll incinerate the bunch of you here and now.

Liquid Communism posted:

There's actually been a shitload of infighting over the issue of women in crown tourneys, specifically involving same-gender couples in leadership positions.

Interestingly, the Board of the organization indicated that they were hesitant to allow it because of the possibility of two skilled male fighters arranging to pass the crown back and forth.

If I remember correctly (it's been a few years since I was active), there's only been a single woman who's won a crown tourney by right of arms in 40+ years. Duchess Rowan Beatrice von Kampfer, who won Ansteorra's Crown tourney in 1990.

A Kingdoms! :circlefap:

Goobers For Guts
Jul 17, 2007

Pixelante posted:

Sorry. I feel like I jacked this thread. I'd really like to hear more about the equestrian stuff because I never got to see any of that close up, and I used to be a hunter-jumper. I'd worry a lot about the safety of everything involved when it comes to jousting. I mean, getting knocked off the saddle is pretty dangerous, and that's sort of the goal of most mounted sparring, right?

Actually we don't promote unsaddling anyone. It's a points based system really. Three points for the shield, two for the chest, one for anywhere else. We really try to be safe. Especially with the animals involved. As much as we try to be period in our dress, barding, and general jousting or coursing style, we are really careful with our animals and with the safety of the riders. It's not nearly as barbaric as the actual sport was. Which some people scoff at.

Besides jousting, we also do the mounted combat which is more about taking hits. Or knocking off a crest on a helm which was an actual tourney event in period. We also do challenge courses which involve spearing rings and 'pigs', knocking dummy heads off posts, chopping reeds, quintain hitting and javelin throwing. It's super fun.

Then there is Buzkashi which is like football on horses. Buzkashi means 'goat dragging' and was a Persian sport using a stuffed goat as the 'football'. That can get pretty brutal. But the horses actually seem to get into it and it can be super fun to watch.

Liquid Communism
Mar 9, 2004


Out here, everything hurts.




People who scoff at not doing the 'hurling opponents from their saddles' sort of jousting should foot the vet bills. ;)

Siivola
Dec 23, 2012

Didin't the actual sport of jousting develop more and more safety features as time went on? I remember reading ~sonewhere~ that the saddles eventually became such that getting thrown off was practically impossible.

Dzurlord
Nov 5, 2011

Verisimilidude posted:

I'm curious what makes the combat "real". I don't participate in SCA, but the people I know who either have or continue to do so hardly consider it realistic, at least in comparison to practice of historical martial arts.

While armored combat isn't particularly historically accurate beyond approaching tournament combat to some degree (and most people I know have pretty much accepted that it's just Its Own Weird Thing in a lot of ways, but a couple people I know are really trying to see if they can incorporate Fiore and Meyer into their longsword/greatsword game, and one mostly retired from combat Duke I know is working on Mair's polearm stuff) there's a pretty big push in the rapier community for more historic combat; lots of us work from period manuals, and between the base rapier combat stuff and the C&T rules, it gets pretty close.

As for the whole larp question, I've larped before (and probably will again) and SCA a lot, and while it's not a larp per se, but it sure has some larp-like aspects in some ways, and that's probably pretty okay.

Pixelante
Mar 16, 2006

You people will by God act like a team, or at least like people who know each other, or I'll incinerate the bunch of you here and now.
SCA fighting is real in the same sense that football or hockey is a real. It's a sport. Equipment keeps it as safe as possible but it is still an extremely violent and fast sport that leaves behind some brag-worthy bruises. You would land in the hospital pretty loving fast if you someone got into sparring or a war without protection--which the SCA has firm rules about. The Gor group I mentioned at Pennsic always rode the line as closely as they could: they would wear the absolute minimum in armour to get past being certified able to fight. Every Pennsic battle had teams of medics and at least one ambulance on the sidelines. Teams of volunteers distributed water between bouts to keep people from dropping in the sun.

It's not WWE wrestling drama with posturing and stories and choreographed fights. It's people with big sticks and armour trying to score hits on their opponent while protecting their own body. Okay sure, if you get hit in the arm you don't get to use that arm any more, but that's as LARP as the fights get. And yes, a lot of it is researched by fighters so they can try to figure out how and why certain styles were used and how to use them effectively. "Rhino-hiding" is when you pretend a hit wasn't hard enough to count. It seems to cause problems because each group calibrates itself differently as to what counts as a strong enough strike. Fighting is also a legitimate skill to master--if you just throw on armour and walk up to a knight, he's going to clobber you. Or, more likely, realize that you're hosed and start teaching you drills until you're ready for sparring.

Goobers For Guts
Jul 17, 2007

Siivola posted:

Didin't the actual sport of jousting develop more and more safety features as time went on? I remember reading ~sonewhere~ that the saddles eventually became such that getting thrown off was practically impossible.

This is quite correct. Saddles developed high cantles and basically were akin to riding in a cushioned bucket. Armor was actually bolted on later in the sport and the frogmouth helm was also developed to prevent shards of wood from getting through the eye slits. Basically, in a late period jousting kit you were pretty much immobile except for your lance arm and you could see through a 1" gap in your helm.

PaleIrishGuy
Feb 5, 2004
Pale as paper

Pixelante posted:

"Rhino-hiding" is when you pretend a hit wasn't hard enough to count. It seems to cause problems because each group calibrates itself differently as to what counts as a strong enough strike.

This is why the policy of some of the mercenary guys in this area is "I will never hit you harder than I can."

Liquid Communism
Mar 9, 2004


Out here, everything hurts.




PaleIrishGuy posted:

This is why the policy of some of the mercenary guys in this area is "I will never hit you harder than I can."

Which is dumber than a cast-iron flotation device.

All the dick-measuring contests on how hard people can hit just leads to people who could have made contributions and enjoyed fighting being scared off, and increased numbers of injuries. There's a reason pretty much every old duke's knees are shot and he's probably blown at least one rotator cuff by the time he retires.

I never had any trouble with it locally, but that was mostly because we had a couple huscarls who came to our fighter practices, and they were older guys who were of the opinion that a hard blow was not the same as a well thrown blow, and set the tone.

PaleIrishGuy
Feb 5, 2004
Pale as paper

Liquid Communism posted:

Which is dumber than a cast-iron flotation device.

All the dick-measuring contests on how hard people can hit just leads to people who could have made contributions and enjoyed fighting being scared off, and increased numbers of injuries. There's a reason pretty much every old duke's knees are shot and he's probably blown at least one rotator cuff by the time he retires.

I never had any trouble with it locally, but that was mostly because we had a couple huscarls who came to our fighter practices, and they were older guys who were of the opinion that a hard blow was not the same as a well thrown blow, and set the tone.

That's one of the reasons i really liked watching the fighting at our last crown tourney. I didn't see anyone shrug a blow for the sake of winning, even it meant the fighter came down to 1 arm on knees (and won with an up thrust past his opponents shield).

On the other hand, I've seen a long time, fairly well renouned in the area, figher refuse to call blows to the head until he got thrust hard in the face whereupon his helm hit his nose and he stormed off the field.

Cotton Candidasis
Aug 28, 2008

What are these mercenaries that were mentioned? How do they fit into the kingdom structure? I've been mildly interested in the SCA for a bit, but haven't heard of these types of groups before.

Liquid Communism
Mar 9, 2004


Out here, everything hurts.




PaleIrishGuy posted:

That's one of the reasons i really liked watching the fighting at our last crown tourney. I didn't see anyone shrug a blow for the sake of winning, even it meant the fighter came down to 1 arm on knees (and won with an up thrust past his opponents shield).

On the other hand, I've seen a long time, fairly well renouned in the area, figher refuse to call blows to the head until he got thrust hard in the face whereupon his helm hit his nose and he stormed off the field.

Our then-baron had a problem with this at war a few years ago. It led to him hitting someone hard enough with a four foot axe to physically throw them to the ground before they'd call the shot good. People's egos lead them to do some pretty stupid things in the name of winning, and it reflects poorly on them.

Pixelante
Mar 16, 2006

You people will by God act like a team, or at least like people who know each other, or I'll incinerate the bunch of you here and now.
I do know some people who do the SCA without being jerks. Apparently they exchange practice blows before actually sparring in order to make sure they're on the same page with what counts as a hit, especially if new fighters are involved, or they haven't sparred in awhile.

Mr. Wiggles
Dec 1, 2003

We are all drinking from the highball glass of ideology.

tweekinator posted:

What are these mercenaries that were mentioned? How do they fit into the kingdom structure? I've been mildly interested in the SCA for a bit, but haven't heard of these types of groups before.

Say you're a fighter or a group of fighters unallied at a particular war. You sell your services to the highest bidder. The better your reputation, the higher fee you attain. It's what I always did when I wasn't fighting with the bukellari.

Liquid Communism
Mar 9, 2004


Out here, everything hurts.




Pixelante posted:

I do know some people who do the SCA without being jerks. Apparently they exchange practice blows before actually sparring in order to make sure they're on the same page with what counts as a hit, especially if new fighters are involved, or they haven't sparred in awhile.

That's the polite way to do it.

Good warmup and it gets everyone's calibration aligned.

Then again, I'm the touchy-feely sort who'd rather accept a questionable blow, since nobody's really dying, than be a dick about it and have ego armor.

The Locator
Sep 12, 2004

Out here, everything hurts.





Oh look, an SCA thread. I'm shocked that there hasn't been one here before (or maybe there has and I just never noticed).

I played in the SCA very heavily from the mid 80's through the late 90's, mostly doing heavy fighting (sword and shield for tourneys, mostly spear at wars) and archery. I still have my shield (sold the armor) and bow, a 68# traditional long bow. I also did some scribing stuff (black letter), but I don't think I was ever really very good at it, leatherworking (made my own scabbard for example), costuming (usually with help for the fancy stuff) and armoring, since we mostly all made our own armor back then.

I never quite got to a peerage before I sort of stopped having fun and then stopped participating altogether.

I sometimes get the urge to go back, but now that I'm well into my own 'middle ages', I'm really not sure what I would do, since hard-suit fighting would probably break me in ways that I don't care to think about.

Goobers For Guts posted:

I'm Lady Heather Hrafnsdottir. My arms are Argent, a columbine slipped and leaved and on a chief invected purpure two mullets Or. And I ride horses in the Atlantian Cavalry. We do joust of course. But there is also horseback archery and various games of skill on horseback.

Lord Gunther Kriegsmann von Braunschweig. My personna was a late 15th century German mercenary, somewhat loosely patterned on the Landsknechts. I no longer remember how to properly blazon heraldry, but this is my shield:


I had some great times while I was in the SCA, and for anyone with a solid interest in that period, I think it's a pretty good group to be a part of. Like any large organization, there are good groups and bad, and political stuff, but overall I think it can be a great hobby and build an amazing circle of friends for many people.

Also, I lived in one of those 'A' kingdoms where we all hit too hard I guess?

Liquid Communism posted:

I wondered if a thread like this would pop up. What's up SCAdians, former Calontiri fighter here. Ask me about how much fun driving a scutum in a shield wall is. :v:

Fought lots of scutum drivers from Caid at Estrella's, Potrero, and West-Caid wars.

Verisimilidude posted:

I'm not entirely sure how realistic this combat is supposed to be. I get whacked unarmored with rattan on a regular basis and it's really not an issue (we wear masks for obvious reasons). I've seen videos of people describing "techniques" that while informed by historical texts ignore some basic rules of realistic historical combat. For instance: whacking someone with a sword while they're wearing metal armor. Or, my personal favorite, hopping to get a strike in over someone's shield.

I'm curious what makes the combat "real". I don't participate in SCA, but the people I know who either have or continue to do so hardly consider it realistic, at least in comparison to practice of historical martial arts.

All rattan is not created equal. My guess is that the rattan swords you get hit with un-armored are made from the outer skin of the rattan and are laced together and hollow cored, like a bamboo practice sword - we called these swords 'shanai' and there was a light weapons form (unarmored except for helmets, gloves and some pads) centered around them. In SCA heavy weapons fighting, the rattan used is a solid piece, about 1-1/4 to 1-1/2" in diameter, taped with strapping tape and then another tape (cloth tape, or sometimes duct tape) over that for the outer surface. Solid rattan is pretty much just a stick of wood, so it's pretty much like hitting each other with thin base-ball bats. Rattan is used because when it breaks it doesn't splinter and cause injury.

Strikes in heavy SCA fighting are full power, can leave creases and dents in lighter gauge steel, and if you get hit in an unarmored location (like a bicep, or thigh) it will raise a nasty welt and leave an amazingly pretty bruise usually. Bone breaks rarely happened when I was in, as the places where that was likely (like fore-arms) were typically required to be armored. Most of the broken bones I can recall were from broken field fighting in wars, and caused by falls or twisted ankles on hills leading to falls or injuries.

PaleIrishGuy
Feb 5, 2004
Pale as paper

The Locator posted:

Strikes in heavy SCA fighting are full power, can leave creases and dents in lighter gauge steel, and if you get hit in an unarmored location (like a bicep, or thigh) it will raise a nasty welt and leave an amazingly pretty bruise usually. Bone breaks rarely happened when I was in, as the places where that was likely (like fore-arms) were typically required to be armored. Most of the broken bones I can recall were from broken field fighting in wars, and caused by falls or twisted ankles on hills leading to falls or injuries.

Most breaks that I've seen or heard of have been thumbs that got wrenched and bashed when people were using polearms.

The Locator
Sep 12, 2004

Out here, everything hurts.





PaleIrishGuy posted:

Most breaks that I've seen or heard of have been thumbs that got wrenched and bashed when people were using polearms.

Makes sense. I always used good aluminum clam-shell gauntlets, but I could still see how a thumb could get broken, even though I never saw it happen.

Cotton Candidasis
Aug 28, 2008

Mr. Wiggles posted:

Say you're a fighter or a group of fighters unallied at a particular war. You sell your services to the highest bidder. The better your reputation, the higher fee you attain. It's what I always did when I wasn't fighting with the bukellari.

Was/is this for actual money, or for some kind of SCA points? If it's for real currency, why would someone pay for help in game? Who is aligned with who? What are all these kingdoms? Do they matter? Do individuals have to kneel/bow to/obey various kings/nobles/cable installers?

I may be jumping straight to the details with those questions, and if so I apologize. What exactly is a war in the SCA, and how are they conducted?

In the heavy fighting, are combatants allowed to use their shields offensively, such as to bash or strike with the rim?

Dzurlord
Nov 5, 2011

The Locator posted:



I sometimes get the urge to go back, but now that I'm well into my own 'middle ages', I'm really not sure what I would do, since hard-suit fighting would probably break me in ways that I don't care to think about.


I know a few semi-retired heavy fighters who are looking into rapier. It's a bit easier on the body, and if you do Cut and Thrust combat, you get to do some really sweet longsword, Bolognese, or other stuff.

Dzurlord
Nov 5, 2011

tweekinator posted:

Was/is this for actual money, or for some kind of SCA points? If it's for real currency, why would someone pay for help in game? Who is aligned with who? What are all these kingdoms? Do they matter? Do individuals have to kneel/bow to/obey various kings/nobles/cable installers?

I may be jumping straight to the details with those questions, and if so I apologize. What exactly is a war in the SCA, and how are they conducted?

In the heavy fighting, are combatants allowed to use their shields offensively, such as to bash or strike with the rim?

Doublepoooooost!

At Pennsic, I've seen some mercenary households who usually sell their services for a couple cases of decent beer, and they bargain for that every year. Others have more of what you'd think of as long term contracts - they show up, get their beer out of the gate, and things move along. Other mercenary households do it for the style and just want to be asked, y'know?

All the Kingdoms are basically regional chapters - http://www.sca.org/geography/ has a (slightly out of date) listing and map. Alliances at wars are based mostly on tradition (some Kingdoms will just always ally with each other, and some wars are traditionally fought between two specific Kingdoms, that kind of thing) and sometimes force balancing. For instance, at Pennsic there's a meeting during the first week where everyone goes over their troop numbers and some alliances shift a bit so that one side isn't brutally outnumbered because that's just no fun.

A war is just a big ol' event with lots of activities that let each side score points to see who wins at the end of it. Heavy combat points, rapier points, archery, arts and science, and so on. (Also usually service points based on volunteer numbers, which is pretty cool.)

Last I checked, you can place a shield against your opponent's body to hinder them, but you can't actually strike with it.

Cotton Candidasis
Aug 28, 2008

Dzurlord posted:

Doublepoooooost!

At Pennsic, I've seen some mercenary households who usually sell their services for a couple cases of decent beer, and they bargain for that every year. Others have more of what you'd think of as long term contracts - they show up, get their beer out of the gate, and things move along. Other mercenary households do it for the style and just want to be asked, y'know?

All the Kingdoms are basically regional chapters - http://www.sca.org/geography/ has a (slightly out of date) listing and map. Alliances at wars are based mostly on tradition (some Kingdoms will just always ally with each other, and some wars are traditionally fought between two specific Kingdoms, that kind of thing) and sometimes force balancing. For instance, at Pennsic there's a meeting during the first week where everyone goes over their troop numbers and some alliances shift a bit so that one side isn't brutally outnumbered because that's just no fun.

A war is just a big ol' event with lots of activities that let each side score points to see who wins at the end of it. Heavy combat points, rapier points, archery, arts and science, and so on. (Also usually service points based on volunteer numbers, which is pretty cool.)

Last I checked, you can place a shield against your opponent's body to hinder them, but you can't actually strike with it.

Thanks! The side-balancing and points system sounds nice as it seems to allow everyone to participate in the competition.

I'm still not quite clear on how these mercenary houses work within the kingdom-barony framework; are they separate from the kingdoms and baronies, are they under the kingdoms and just other small chapters like the baronies, or are they outside the kingdom system?

Also, how child-friendly is the SCA in general? My wife would like to look into this (which means I'd also be a participant) but would a 9 year old have anything fun to do, or are these adult-only groups and events?

PaleIrishGuy
Feb 5, 2004
Pale as paper

tweekinator posted:

Thanks! The side-balancing and points system sounds nice as it seems to allow everyone to participate in the competition.

I'm still not quite clear on how these mercenary houses work within the kingdom-barony framework; are they separate from the kingdoms and baronies, are they under the kingdoms and just other small chapters like the baronies, or are they outside the kingdom system?

Also, how child-friendly is the SCA in general? My wife would like to look into this (which means I'd also be a participant) but would a 9 year old have anything fun to do, or are these adult-only groups and events?

The SCA is really child friendly. Every event I've been to has stuff for kids, and, if they want to, there is even boffer combat where available (basically like heavy, but with foam instead of wood).

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dzurlord
Nov 5, 2011
Yeah, it's usually super kid-friendly. Various places have kid programs happening at events to various degrees - in the East, I know that our new Queen is really pushing a Children's Service Initiative where if kids help out during events, they get called up in Court and get a token from her. It's pretty great.

Mercenary households - and households in general - are a personal thing, apart from the Kingdom-Barony framework. Some may hold allegiances to a Barony or Kingdom, or not.

So, for instance, some Dukes have formed households on their own. They camp together, train together, are friends outside of events, fight as a unit in battles, and stuff. They will all generally fight with their home Kingdom though, 'cause Dukes.

A mercenary household is the same thing - some people who are friends started doing a lot of stuff together, and camping together, and fighting as a unit, and all. When they go to a big war (like Pennsic), they'll offer their services to whoever makes them the best offer. Or maybe they always offer their home Kingdom right of first refusal, or whatever. The thing is, they need to be meaningful enough to be worth talking to. So like four new dudes won't get the time of day, but a unit of 25 really good fighters would get some solid notice.

Households don't need to be all about fighting, either. There are service households, fencing households, or households who are just comprised of friends who like to hang out, camp, and support one another.

  • Locked thread