Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Constant Hamprince
Oct 24, 2010

by exmarx
College Slice
too many loving glowing LEDs OP, it's obnoxious

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Applewhite
Aug 16, 2014

by vyelkin
Nap Ghost

Jastiger posted:

A good idea.

But I'm not saying mug guy should be fired. But he should be treated as if he's endorsing the flag unless otherwise noted. I know a lot of folks that are "ironically" racist or use social media to "IRONICALLY " fly the flag.

But are actually racist using irony as a shield. So I don't think it's unfair to treat them unironically

Yeah I can agree with that.
I think the difference between our attitudes is that I think there are worse things a person can be than a low-level racist. I would rather spend time in the company of someone who is implicitly racist against white people than a stereotypical "SJW."
Having spent time in the company of both, my differences with the racist are usually much easier to work out.

FormerPoster
Aug 5, 2004

Hair Elf

Applewhite posted:

I think the Washington Redskins have been somewhat of a victim of shifting cultural trends, and that the term was not as insulting when the team was named as it has come to be in modern times. Consider that "Oklahoma" translates to "red people" in Choctaw and no one is complaining about that.
I fully understand that "redskin" is now considered highly insulting and inappropriate, but in the case of the sports team I believe it should be grandfathered in, much the same way "colored people" (another term that's no longer appropriate) is grandfathered into the NAACP.

I'd be a lot more sympathetic to the team's argument for tradition if I wasn't so sure that the Redskins would pick up and leave Washington the second a different city made them a better deal, as is true of all major sports teams.

Maintaining tradition only matters as long as it's the most profitable option.

Orkin Mang
Nov 1, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Applewhite posted:

Yeah I can agree with that.
I think the difference between our attitudes is that I think there are worse things a person can be than a low-level racist. I would rather spend time in the company of someone who is implicitly racist against white people than a stereotypical "SJW."
Having spent time in the company of both, my differences with the racist are usually much easier to work out.

and sometimes the 'racists' are just making a sweet joke. its one of those do i or dont i hakuna matata situations. theres no right andswer except to just keep up the vibe without letting it get to u. peace

basement jihadist
Oct 3, 2002

cram me sideways posted:

AMERICA: ACT I

people with all the money: we want to keep all the money

people with none of the money: hey we could really use that

people with all the money: gently caress off brownskins

people with none of the money: but-

*police enter from stage right and beat the poo poo out of them*

uh no ACT I is when the pilgrims run away from the jew kings of europe and invite the brown people over to try eating food

Applewhite
Aug 16, 2014

by vyelkin
Nap Ghost

Naerasa posted:

I'd be a lot more sympathetic to the team's argument for tradition if I wasn't so sure that the Redskins would pick up and leave Washington the second a different city made them a better deal, as is true of all major sports teams.

Maintaining tradition only matters as long as it's the most profitable option.

At the bottom of it, sports teams are the literal embodiment of the same instinct that makes humans racist in the first place, and I guess that, to me, anything else they do doesn't really matter because it's all geared around pushing the same pleasure buttons in our brains.

Mercrom
Jul 17, 2009
women are weaker than men. black people commit more crime. the US military is and has always been full of terrorists.

imo easily offended people should gently caress off

Jastiger
Oct 11, 2008

by FactsAreUseless

Applewhite posted:

Yeah I can agree with that.
I think the difference between our attitudes is that I think there are worse things a person can be than a low-level racist. I would rather spend time in the company of someone who is implicitly racist against white people than a stereotypical "SJW."
Having spent time in the company of both, my differences with the racist are usually much easier to work out.

Never been around a sjw to that extent. What do they do? Are they pc gone mad?

And do they vote republican?

Applewhite
Aug 16, 2014

by vyelkin
Nap Ghost

Jastiger posted:

Never been around a sjw to that extent. What do they do? Are they pc gone mad?

And do they vote republican?

yes SJWs are PC gone mad. The only thing that stops them from voting republican is the fact that republicans are unpopular in their circles for reasons they don't fully understand.

Orkin Mang
Nov 1, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Applewhite posted:

yes SJWs are PC gone mad. The only thing that stops them from voting republican is the fact that republicans are unpopular in their circles for reasons they don't fully understand.

explain

dogcrash truther
Nov 2, 2013
People just need something to be grumpy about, OP, it's no big deal.

Hell Yeah
Dec 25, 2012

it's like skynet basically

basement jihadist
Oct 3, 2002

dogcrash truther posted:

People just need something to be grumpy about, OP, it's no big deal.

jastinger is.... heh... on the spectrum you see....

dad gay. so what
Feb 18, 2003

by FactsAreUseless

Applewhite posted:

yes SJWs are PC gone mad. The only thing that stops them from voting republican is the fact that republicans are unpopular in their circles for reasons they don't fully understand.

i would argue that the PC movement is a result of a liberal agenda to strip meaning and objective truths from our culture and to create victim classes to exploit politically

basement jihadist
Oct 3, 2002

dad gay. so what posted:

i would argue that the PC movement is a result of a liberal agenda to strip meaning and objective truths from our culture and to create victim classes to exploit politically

dont you loving dare

dogcrash truther
Nov 2, 2013

dad gay. so what posted:

i would argue that the PC movement is a result of a liberal agenda to strip meaning and objective truths from our culture and to create victim classes to exploit politically

You cheeky fucker.

Extra Large Marge
Jan 21, 2004

Fun Shoe

Applewhite posted:

I think the Washington Redskins have been somewhat of a victim of shifting cultural trends, and that the term was not as insulting when the team was named as it has come to be in modern times. Consider that "Oklahoma" translates to "red people" in Choctaw and no one is complaining about that.
I fully understand that "redskin" is now considered highly insulting and inappropriate, but in the case of the sports team I believe it should be grandfathered in, much the same way "colored people" (another term that's no longer appropriate) is grandfathered into the NAACP.

That's an interesting point, however American Indian rights groups have been trying to get the name changed since the 1940s.

There's no real historical significance of the name either, as the name "Washington Redskins" had nothing to do with actual American Indians. It just sounded cool at the time.

powerofrecall
Jun 26, 2009

by R. Guyovich

dad gay. so what posted:

i would argue that the PC movement is a result of a liberal agenda to strip meaning and objective truths from our culture and to create victim classes to exploit politically

:gowron:

Orkin Mang
Nov 1, 2007

by FactsAreUseless
i believe choice as such is its own end, and the index of all value

mind the walrus
Sep 22, 2006

dad gay. so what posted:

i would argue that the PC movement is a result of a liberal agenda to strip meaning and objective truths from our culture and to create victim classes to exploit politically

0/10 doesn't incorporate blame to millennials

dad gay. so what
Feb 18, 2003

by FactsAreUseless

mind the walrus posted:

0/10 doesn't incorporate blame to millennials

i believe the children are our future, treat them well, and let them lead the way

Jastiger
Oct 11, 2008

by FactsAreUseless

dad gay. so what posted:

i would argue that the PC movement is a result of a liberal agenda to strip meaning and objective truths from our culture and to create victim classes to exploit politically

What is the pc movement. Was MLK part of that? Integrating lunch counters? Equal pay for women? Universal healthcare?

I think to some point you're right but it's a very low bar, especially when the alternative doesn't want a bar at all and wants revision to carry the day.

Basically even if being pc was evil and victim creating, is it better than a culture that crushes all dissent and minority opinion?

mind the walrus
Sep 22, 2006

dad gay. so what posted:

i believe the children are our future, treat them well, and let them lead the way

Millennials are no longer children.

dad gay. so what
Feb 18, 2003

by FactsAreUseless

Jastiger posted:

What is the pc movement. Was MLK part of that? Integrating lunch counters? Equal pay for women? Universal healthcare?

I think to some point you're right but it's a very low bar, especially when the alternative doesn't want a bar at all and wants revision to carry the day.

Basically even if being pc was evil and victim creating, is it better than a culture that crushes all dissent and minority opinion?

its better to call a spade a spade and move on


(i will probably be called racist for using this colloquialism)

(thats what PC's do)

(also millenials who dont even know how to use outlook :rolleyes:)

basement jihadist
Oct 3, 2002

its those mac vs. pc commercials but backwards??

Orkin Mang
Nov 1, 2007

by FactsAreUseless
when things get a bit contentious with me and my friends, i just say to them 'look to the stars, bowen'. because arent we all just star dust in the end?

Applewhite
Aug 16, 2014

by vyelkin
Nap Ghost

The worst of SJW culture and the worst of the Conservative Right are both acting out the same base instinct to hate those different from themselves. SJWs' outspoken, violent demonization of republicans is not rooted in a desire to see actual social justice any more than the racial supremacy movements of yesteryear were born from any sort of real "science."
Science and Social Justice are both being exploited as a thin justification to hate unpopular people with impunity, and just because your particular prejudice happens to be "du jour" doesn't make you a good person.

SJWs and Radical Conservatives aren't on opposite ends of the spectrum any more than rabid fans of opposing sports teams are "opposites."
So for this reason I hate both of them and that's why I'm the good guy you should listen to.

verdigris murder
Jul 10, 2011

by FactsAreUseless
I wonder if SJW's enjoy doggystyle and anal sex, or if their median position is slightly more puritan.

ANIME IS BLOOD
Sep 4, 2008

by zen death robot

Orkin Mang posted:

when things get a bit contentious with me and my friends, i just say to them 'look to the stars, bowen'. because arent we all just star dust in the end?

I'm gonna pound you into star dust, hippy :twisted:

Jastiger
Oct 11, 2008

by FactsAreUseless
Ehhj. A spade a spade leads to ignoring historic or institutional realities. It creates the Cadillac welfare queen, the thug, the in god we trust on money being a founding fathers thing.

It's all bullshit and if we all just "called a spade a spade " as shorthand for "justifying my passing knowledge of a thing " we have problem. I see pc type behavior combating this













Racist.



Edit: Applewhite mad about sjws, and that makes sense. But what's different between say, Eugene Debs and a sjw?

Orkin Mang
Nov 1, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

Applewhite posted:

The worst of SJW culture and the worst of the Conservative Right are both acting out the same base instinct to hate those different from themselves. SJWs' outspoken, violent demonization of republicans is not rooted in a desire to see actual social justice any more than the racial supremacy movements of yesteryear were born from any sort of real "science."
Science and Social Justice are both being exploited as a thin justification to hate unpopular people with impunity, and just because your particular prejudice happens to be "du jour" doesn't make you a good person.

SJWs and Radical Conservatives aren't on opposite ends of the spectrum any more than rabid fans of opposing sports teams are "opposites."
So for this reason I hate both of them and that's why I'm the good guy you should listen to.

hm. seems true. hate seems to be the problem. hate and the love of power.

basement jihadist
Oct 3, 2002

Orkin Mang posted:

when things get a bit contentious with me and my friends, i just say to them 'look to the stars, bowen'. because arent we all just star dust in the end?

faaaaarrrrts in the wind..... all we are is faaarts in the wiiiiinnndd

verdigris murder
Jul 10, 2011

by FactsAreUseless
Also lots of stuff about horseshoe theory, and mimetic isomorphism.

basement jihadist
Oct 3, 2002

Jastiger posted:

Ehhj. A spade a spade leads to ignoring historic or institutional realities. It creates the Cadillac welfare queen, the thug, the in god we trust on money being a founding fathers thing.

It's all bullshit and if we all just "called a spade a spade " as shorthand for "justifying my passing knowledge of a thing " we have problem. I see pc type behavior combating this













Racist.



Edit: Applewhite mad about sjws, and that makes sense. But what's different between say, Eugene Debs and a sjw?

absolutely nothin at all

Applewhite
Aug 16, 2014

by vyelkin
Nap Ghost

Jastiger posted:

Edit: Applewhite mad about sjws, and that makes sense. But what's different between say, Eugene Debs and a sjw?

IDK, who is Eugene Debs?

Orkin Mang
Nov 1, 2007

by FactsAreUseless
love does not compel them, but vanity and hate.

Applewhite
Aug 16, 2014

by vyelkin
Nap Ghost

Orkin Mang posted:

love does not compel them, but vanity and hate.

I hate people like that so much.
But I love hating them, so really I'm driven by love.

Jastiger
Oct 11, 2008

by FactsAreUseless
Eugene Debs was a huge socialist thay wanted unions to take the means of production. He was jailed for his trouble and ran unsuccessfully for president twice.

dad gay. so what
Feb 18, 2003

by FactsAreUseless

Jastiger posted:

Eugene Debs was a huge socialist thay wanted unions to take the means of production. He was jailed for his trouble and ran unsuccessfully for president twice.

i think you are a gay fag

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Applewhite
Aug 16, 2014

by vyelkin
Nap Ghost

Jastiger posted:

Eugene Debs was a huge socialist thay wanted unions to take the means of production. He was jailed for his trouble and ran unsuccessfully for president twice.

Desiring social justice, even being a warrior for it, does not an "SJW" make, imo. I still don't know enough about Eugene Debs to say for sure, but since it looks like he was actually trying to accomplish something, however misguided, I'm going to go out on a limb and say he's not an SJW.

"SJW" when used as a sneer word refers specifically to those who don't actually desire social justice as much as they invoke (admittedly real) social injustices as an excuse to treat others badly and feel superior. Its not about changing society as much as it is making a fashion statement.

Martin Luther King was a social justice warrior, but he was not an "SJW" as it is used in popular parlance.

Social Justice is good and important, just like science is good and important.

When you try to invoke evolutionary science to "prove" Black people are less evolved, you're bad.

When you try to invoke the double standard by which women are treated in society to "prove" that a guy sitting with his legs spread out on the subway is committing sexual assault, you are also bad.

  • Locked thread