Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


Oberleutnant posted:

Did I already say gently caress tories?

Let me add to that chorus:

quote:

The European migration crisis will not be solved simply by Britain taking in more refugees, David Cameron has said in response to a call from the shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper, to take as many as 10,000.

The prime minister said the best solution to the migration crisis was to bring peace and stability to the Middle East and stressed the UK has taken a number of asylum seekers from Syria.

During a visit to Northamptonshire, Cameron said: “We have taken a number of genuine asylum seekers from Syrian refugee camps and we keep that under review, but we think the most important thing is to try to bring peace and stability to that part of the world.

“I don’t think there is an answer that can be achieved simply by taking more and more refugees.”


Cameron said Britain was focusing on stabilising and improving the countries where migrants and refugees come from and highlighted action the government was taking to improve security at the French port of Calais.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/02/david-cameron-migration-crisis-will-not-be-solved-by-uk-taking-in-more-refugees

Hmmm, stabilize the entire Mid-East or act like a human being (and not like an outer-space lizard) and at least up the numbers due to the genuine war refugee crisis now unfolding?

Welp, the answer is bombs.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

loving STABILISE YOU FOREIGN TWATS, HOW MANY BOMBS DO I NEED TO DROP ON YOU BEFORE YOU loving STABILISE.

LET ME IMPROVE YOUR COUNTRY WITH THESE ANTI TANK MISSILES.

LASER GUIDED STABILITY ON THE WAY!

You know, I'm kind of thinking I'm glad the Tories aren't investing in British infrastructure, because I think that would just mean carpet bombing the place.

OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 15:09 on Sep 2, 2015

Prince John
Jun 20, 2006

Oh, poppycock! Female bandits?

^^ Hehe.

OwlFancier posted:

I think there's more stupid than cunts in the world, mind. Not by much, but somewhat.

I think most people probably just assume that somehow, wages and livable conditions work themselves out because people (that I can see) aren't literally dying in front of me (because we keep them out of the way to do that) so obviously we don't really need these unions (who I only ever hear about when they strike).

I think it's also that there's a thoroughly engrained capitalist mentality in the average non-unionised low wage worker. They work long hours, for low pay, can't strike and one of the few things they can take pride in is their dogged attendance at work and willingness to keep suffering through it.

When they're trying to get to work and see a tube strike (for example), they look at workers who are paid better, who have more secure jobs and better pensions and equate the strike action with a lack of Getting On - a mixture of resentment and envy isn't surprising if that's your worldview. There's a complete lack of awareness that collective action could apply to them or is in any way a desirable thing - they think they're better than the strikers because they've never been on strike, as if it's a badge of pride.

I don't know, maybe that's a parody, but the people I often hear speak most vociferously against striking down the pub (NB: not in the North) are those who would benefit most from unionising up, and I can't think of a different way to explain it. (I don't subscribe to the view that people are just evil, just short sighted.)

Prince John fucked around with this message at 15:15 on Sep 2, 2015

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

It is certainly easier to take personal pride in ability to work hard under duress, I mean, I do it myself. But it's no fun. Maybe it comes with age that you turn into some kind of weird masochist who gets turned on by the thought of working lovely hours for a lovely boss with a lovely company.

There are plenty of Northerners who whinge about striking in my experience, but maybe we might have a slightly higher preponderance of actually well informed socialists.

Being proud of not striking is sort of like being proud of your ability to demolish brick walls with your face, rather than using a sledgehammer like some kind of lazy fucker.

OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 15:18 on Sep 2, 2015

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.

OwlFancier posted:

You know, I'm kind of thinking I'm glad the Tories aren't investing in British infrastructure, because I think that would just mean carpet bombing the place.

Well some countries took a good bombing and got a free Marshall plan out of it so maybe it's worth a go?

Prince John
Jun 20, 2006

Oh, poppycock! Female bandits?

^^ Love it.

OwlFancier posted:

Being proud of not striking is sort of like being proud of your ability to demolish brick walls with your face, rather than using a sledgehammer like some kind of lazy fucker.

I don't disagree - but do you think it's an accurate description of some people's worldview or am I pissing into the wind?

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Seems pretty accurate to me. Striking is not a physically demanding, or even necessarily emotionally demanding task, and it does seem superficially unfair when there are people without jobs at all.

Unfortunately it is the only way anyone will get a decent job. When so many things are designed to make you thankful for any job, though, it's difficult to get that message through.

It is important always to remember, that you are doing your employer a favour, and if you weren't, they wouldn't employ you. The favour is inherent in the conditions of your employment, it's called a profit margin.

Prince John
Jun 20, 2006

Oh, poppycock! Female bandits?

OwlFancier posted:

It is important always to remember, that you are doing your employer a favour, and if you weren't, they wouldn't employ you.

You do come out with some great pithy one-liners sometimes! :swoon:

Phoon
Apr 23, 2010

Its a very common worldview and its encouraged by the rich and right wingers at every opportunity. its also one of the major themes of ragged trousered philanthropists

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Prince John posted:

You do come out with some great pithy one-liners sometimes! :swoon:

Can you guess which book series I read a lot of growing up and which I wrote lots about in the previous thread?

I bet you can't.

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


OwlFancier posted:

Can you guess which book series I read a lot of growing up and which I wrote lots about in the previous thread?

I bet you can't.

Is it Enid Blyton's Malory Towers series?

Kegluneq
Feb 18, 2011

Mr President, the physical reality of Prime Minister Corbyn is beyond your range of apprehension. If you'll just put on these PINKOVISION glasses...

Phoon posted:

Its a very common worldview and its encouraged by the rich and right wingers at every opportunity. its also one of the major themes of ragged trousered philanthropists

I think you misread him.

Phoon
Apr 23, 2010

How so?

MrL_JaKiri
Sep 23, 2003

A bracing glass of carrot juice!

OwlFancier posted:

Can you guess which book series I read a lot of growing up and which I wrote lots about in the previous thread?

I bet you can't.

Dirk Gently

Prince John
Jun 20, 2006

Oh, poppycock! Female bandits?

Junior G-man posted:

Is it Enid Blyton's Malory Towers series?

Snigger.

I think I missed out not reading any Pratchett when I was a kid. :(

tooterfish
Jul 13, 2013

OwlFancier posted:

I think there's more stupid than cunts in the world, mind. Not by much, but somewhat.

I think most people probably just assume that somehow, wages and livable conditions work themselves out because people (that I can see) aren't literally dying in front of me (because we keep them out of the way to do that) so obviously we don't really need these unions (who I only ever hear about when they strike).
I suppose you're right.

I don't necessarily regard people who believe neo-liberal propaganda as actual neo-liberals though, because the propaganda and the beliefs aren't exactly congruent.

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma



First English language books I ever read. Borrowed them from a neighbour.

Hell of a weird thing to read as a 10 year old.

Phoon
Apr 23, 2010

As a child I only read books with wizards

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I seem to remember reading a few Famous Five novels, dunno what Malory Towers is though.

Also read probably the entire Redwall series, which I think means I have to end up incredibly racist and a furry.

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


OwlFancier posted:

I seem to remember reading a few Famous Five novels, dunno what Malory Towers is though.

Girl boarding school stories with 1950's moral lessons.

Also tame beyond belief; I dug them out a while back and tried to read them again. Not a good idea.

MrL_JaKiri
Sep 23, 2003

A bracing glass of carrot juice!

Phoon posted:

As a child I only read books with wizards

And what books did the wizards read with you?

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


MrL_JaKiri posted:

And what books did the wizards read with you?

:golfclap:

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Junior G-man posted:

Girl boarding school stories with 1950's moral lessons.

Also tame beyond belief; I dug them out a while back and tried to read them again. Not a good idea.

Aww, I was thinking when you said "hell of a thing to read as 10 year old" and then opened with "girls boarding school" that we were in for some James Joyce's letters to his wife level of literary magnificence.

lmaoboy1998
Oct 23, 2013

Prince John posted:


When they're trying to get to work and see a tube strike (for example), they look at workers who are paid better, who have more secure jobs and better pensions and equate the strike action with a lack of Getting On - a mixture of resentment and envy isn't surprising if that's your worldview. There's a complete lack of awareness that collective action could apply to them or is in any way a desirable thing - they think they're better than the strikers because they've never been on strike, as if it's a badge of pride.


Basically British people are some of the most envious, petty and worst informed human beings in the developed world

We also have a deep hostility to the idea of having principles or standing up for anything (that isn't our own racial superiority/national interest). I speak four languages and ours is the only one where I've seen stupid phrases like 'worthy' which are specifically designed to criticise people attempting to do a good thing.

For example: my friend announced that Corbyn was 'a selfish arsehole' because he divorced his wife over the fact that she sent their kids to public school. I pointed out she'd be calling him a 'hypocrite' if he'd gone along with that and she said he's a hypocrite anyway because he's paying alimony and that's being used by the wife for the school fees (yeah, but against his will. wtf bitch?). It's this combination of hatred and willful ignorance/irrationality when discussing politics that I've never really encountered in any other country I've been to.

What's the alternative to being 'worthy' or striking, or putting other people ahead of your family? Do we want to be Italy or some loving petrostate where everyone 'looks after their own' at the expense of society? Because I feel like that's what we're moving toward.

sebzilla
Mar 17, 2009

Kid's blasting everything in sight with that new-fangled musket.


OwlFancier posted:

Also read probably the entire Redwall series, which I think means I have to end up incredibly racist and a furry.

Worth it for the descriptions of food.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

sebzilla posted:

Worth it for the descriptions of food.

Yesssss. Good god that man liked his food. Pages and pages of food pornography. I have literally read porno novels which devoted less care and time to the loving than Brian Jacques put into his writing about food.

Prince John
Jun 20, 2006

Oh, poppycock! Female bandits?

Junior G-man posted:

First English language books I ever read. Borrowed them from a neighbour.

Hell of a weird thing to read as a 10 year old.

Yeah, I laughed, but I read them for some random reason when I was a kid too. Thanks for the warning though - I was idly contemplating that a few months ago.

I picked up The Faraway Tree series randomly a while back, and was pretty miffed to find out that it's been politically correctified - I almost wrote an outraged Daily Mail article right there. The censors shouldn't be allowed to touch national treasures.

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


OwlFancier posted:

Aww, I was thinking when you said "hell of a thing to read as 10 year old" and then opened with "girls boarding school" that we were in for some James Joyce's letters to his wife level of literary magnificence.

Would but that it were. Those are magnificent.

Although, on re-reading there's two 'tom-boys' who do seem to spend an inordinate amount of time together while trying to hide from the teachers. But that might be reading wayy too much into Enid Blyton.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

lmaoboy1998 posted:

Basically British people are some of the most envious, petty and worst informed human beings in the developed world

We also have a deep hostility to the idea of having principles or standing up for anything (that isn't our own racial superiority/national interest). I speak four languages and ours is the only one where I've seen stupid phrases like 'worthy' which are specifically designed to criticise people attempting to do a good thing.

For example: my friend announced that Corbyn was 'a selfish arsehole' because he divorced his wife over the fact that she sent their kids to public school. I pointed out she'd be calling him a 'hypocrite' if he'd gone along with that and she said he's a hypocrite anyway because he's paying alimony and that's being used by the wife for the school fees (yeah, but against his will. wtf bitch?). It's this combination of hatred and willful ignorance/irrationality when discussing politics that I've never really encountered in any other country I've been to.

What's the alternative to being 'worthy' or striking, or putting other people ahead of your family? Do we want to be Italy or some loving petrostate where everyone 'looks after their own' at the expense of society? Because I feel like that's what we're moving toward.

Sever. At the neck.

Much the same as with unions, people start out with a preconceived notion and pick arguments to support it. Both options lead to the same conclusion because everything leads to that conclusion. Post hoc rationalization ho!

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Junior G-man posted:

Would but that it were. Those are magnificent.

Although, on re-reading there's two 'tom-boys' who do seem to spend an inordinate amount of time together while trying to hide from the teachers. But that might be reading wayy too much into Enid Blyton.

I can't remember very much so I might be wrong but George from my memory reads like a bizzarely realistic and non-unpleasant take on transgenderedness for a book of that age.

Though I seem to recall there was a weird "famous five as adults" book where she ends up married with kids or something so maybe not.

Kegluneq
Feb 18, 2011

Mr President, the physical reality of Prime Minister Corbyn is beyond your range of apprehension. If you'll just put on these PINKOVISION glasses...

Junior G-man posted:

Although, on re-reading there's two 'tom-boys' who do seem to spend an inordinate amount of time together while trying to hide from the teachers. But that might be reading wayy too much into Enid Blyton.
You have read Famous Five, right?

Edit: ^^Yeah, George reads like a trans boy, although I think she's meant to be read as a tomboy rather than someone with gender dysphoria. For what it's worth George was the author insert character.

There have been a couple of spinoffs of the Five as adults (parodies), but I don't think Blyton ever wrote them as such.

Kegluneq fucked around with this message at 16:02 on Sep 2, 2015

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


Kegluneq posted:

You have read Famous Five, right?

Weirdly, no I haven't. My sister was into those but it never convinced me.

Although, to my odd satisfaction, my neighbour only had 1-4 and 6, so when I finally found 5 somewhere when I was like 17 it was a treat to read the missing bit. Although you do read it in a very, very different way by then.

Phoon
Apr 23, 2010

MrL_JaKiri posted:

And what books did the wizards read with you?

I hope there is a charity somewhere where wizards teach disadvantaged children to read

MrL_JaKiri
Sep 23, 2003

A bracing glass of carrot juice!

Phoon posted:

I hope there is a charity somewhere where wizards teach disadvantaged children to read

It's a full basic curriculum programme, they share lesson time with some mathemagicians

freebooter
Jul 7, 2009

lmaoboy1998 posted:

Basically British people are some of the most envious, petty and worst informed human beings in the developed world

Going back to Pratchett, he had a great quote summing up the British character - easily on display in letters to the editor - as being animated by a "hair-trigger fear that someone somewhere might be getting more than their fair share."

kapparomeo
Apr 19, 2011

Some say his extreme-right links are clearly known, even in the fascist capitalist imperialist Murdochist press...
There comes a tipping point where strikes are less about workers heroically struggling for their rights and more about, a lmaoboy puts it, looking after their own at the expense of society and self-aggrandising when they already have got improved deals.

This is why the Masses will never have class solidarity with a Tube strike.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UymKurTBdhw

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

freebooter posted:

Going back to Pratchett, he had a great quote summing up the British character - easily on display in letters to the editor - as being animated by a "hair-trigger fear that someone somewhere might be getting more than their fair share."

But we are not a nation of socialists??

Junior G-man
Sep 15, 2004

Wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma


OwlFancier posted:

But we are not a nation of socialists??

No we are a nation of hard-working families and scroungers.

MrL_JaKiri
Sep 23, 2003

A bracing glass of carrot juice!

kapparomeo posted:

There comes a tipping point where strikes are less about workers heroically struggling for their rights and more about, a lmaoboy puts it, looking after their own at the expense of society and self-aggrandising when they already have got improved deals.

This is why the Masses will never have class solidarity with a Tube strike.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UymKurTBdhw

You know that's not why they're striking

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

freebooter posted:

Going back to Pratchett, he had a great quote summing up the British character - easily on display in letters to the editor - as being animated by a "hair-trigger fear that someone somewhere might be getting more than their fair share."
Except when people are obviously getting more than their fair share.

If you're an immigrant and you're begging on the streets, you need to be shot, then sent back home, then shot again. If you're an immigrant who establishes a chain of successful restaurants and profit wildly from underpaying your workers, you're all right for one of them.
See also: Being on benefits vs. being on the board of somewhere that gets inflated government contracts because of your friends.

lmaoboy1998 posted:

Basically British people are some of the most envious, petty and worst informed human beings in the developed world
Have you spent much time in the New World?

  • Locked thread