|
Junior G-man posted:That article is just so catastrophically bad. Corbyn might not have given her a nosebleed, but her lovely article gave me a headache. The best part is where she feverishly extrapolates Watson's critique of Conservative policy into a hatred of Tories, non-Corbynites, the media and anyone with a Twitter account. "Tom Watson called the Tories the Nasty Party. So much for kindness!". How utterly inane. She even has the gall to follow up her piece of speculative fiction by saying how "the peculiar certainties of these worldviews do not speak to me of the modern world". Don't vote for the voices in your head, then, you utter cretin.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:04 |
|
|
# ? Mar 29, 2024 09:53 |
|
Vice have attacked Corbyn for his weak stance on global annihilation http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/nukes-are-good-for-the-british-economy-578 quote:Reasons Why the Nuclear Destruction of Life on Earth Is Good for the British Economy
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:05 |
|
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad posted:Vice have attacked Corbyn for his weak stance on global annihilation http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/nukes-are-good-for-the-british-economy-578 lol of course it's sam kriss
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:06 |
|
NO gently caress YOU DAD posted:Corbyn might not have given her a nosebleed, but her lovely article gave me a headache. The best part is where she feverishly extrapolates Watson's critique of Conservative policy into a hatred of Tories, non-Corbynites, the media and anyone with a Twitter account. What happened, did he mispronounce "Nazi Party" or something?
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:13 |
|
So if the Tories survive the Europe referendum are we going to see some acknowledgement that disagreement on some issues, even hugely important and divisive ones, isn't necessarily a death knell for a party?
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:17 |
|
XMNN posted:So if the Tories survive the Europe referendum are we going to see some acknowledgement that disagreement on some issues, even hugely important and divisive ones, isn't necessarily a death knell for a party? No because it's a death knell for the Labour Party. The Conservatives can do what they like.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:26 |
|
The Tories are the nasty party. They're literally the reason the UK is being investigated for human rights abuses against the disabled. If calling the tories the Nasty Party upsets you more than human rights abuses against the disabled then what the gently caress is wrong with you?quote:Being for kindness is as vague as being against austerity. What the gently caress does this even mean? Like, is austerity not identifiable as ideological cuts to the public sector and mass privatisation? Why is she describing it as if it's an emotion? What the gently caress even is the Guardian's comment is free section anymore? Help my nose is bleeding
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:33 |
|
Guavanaut posted:e: 3 - The rule of emperor Augustus is renewed for a ten-year period. One of the better emperors by all accounts, as at least he didn't gently caress a pig. Has he actually denied it, though? Otherwise we can't rule it out.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:37 |
|
http://news.sky.com/story/1561619/corbyn-nukes-didnt-do-usa-much-good-on-9-11 Why can't Corbyn just shut the gently caress up about nukes already? quote:He said: "Nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction that take out millions of civilians. They didn't do the USA much good on 9/11." Oh okay, that makes sense. No wait, it doesn't, that's loving retarded. Nukes are not there to respond to terrorism or even deter from terrorist from attacking you. They are there do deter other countries from nuking you or invading you.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:41 |
|
I believe its a statement about how modern wars are not being fought against nations so deterrents that put off nations have little to no effect on them. Which is right, but it doesnt deny the point that it still does give said nation a lot more bargaining power at the negotiating table with other nations.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:44 |
|
OhYeah posted:No wait, it doesn't, that's loving retarded. Nukes are not there to respond to terrorism or even deter from terrorist from attacking you. It's almost like that was his entire point!
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:45 |
|
OhYeah posted:http://news.sky.com/story/1561619/corbyn-nukes-didnt-do-usa-much-good-on-9-11 Because people ask him and he answers things honestly? OhYeah posted:Oh okay, that makes sense. “Would anybody press the nuclear button? Nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction that take out millions of civilians. They didn’t do the USA much good on 9/11 – the problems in this world are not huge wars in that way." Yes that does make sense, what's your problem with it
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:46 |
|
can we please just have a loving moratorium on nukechat
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:47 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:can we please just have a loving moratorium on nukechat there is always more and it is always worse
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:50 |
|
OhYeah posted:http://news.sky.com/story/1561619/corbyn-nukes-didnt-do-usa-much-good-on-9-11 Nobody is going to nuke or invade the UK. I'm very sorry that your country is next to Russia but ours isn't.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:51 |
|
Lord of the Llamas posted:Nobody is going to nuke or invade the UK. im sure it will be soon raises an interesting question, if we did drop trident would the US look for another european country to gain/increase their arsenal?* Germany was their client state for decades and is nearer to russia so they seem the obvious choice *really they would engineer a coup before we could get rid of them
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:55 |
|
OhYeah posted:http://news.sky.com/story/1561619/corbyn-nukes-didnt-do-usa-much-good-on-9-11 Did you grow tired of being schooled in the scandinavian thread and decide to move on to other battlefields?
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:58 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:can we please just have a loving moratorium on nukechat Or at least make a formal agreement to not allow it to proliferate further.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 13:59 |
|
In the spirit of peace I am unilaterally declaring that I will never engage in nukechat.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:00 |
|
serious gaylord posted:I believe its a statement about how modern wars are not being fought against nations so deterrents that put off nations have little to no effect on them. Oberleutnant posted:can we please just have a loving moratorium on nukechat mfcrocker posted:there is always more and it is always worse
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:02 |
|
Phoon posted:im sure it will be soon actually the us wants britain to give up trident iirc
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:02 |
|
Gonzo McFee posted:The Tories are the nasty party. They're literally the reason the UK is being investigated for human rights abuses against the disabled. If calling the tories the Nasty Party upsets you more than human rights abuses against the disabled then what the gently caress is wrong with you? I think she's enjoyed a bit too much of the finest wines known to humanity.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:03 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:In the spirit of peace I am unilaterally declaring that I will never engage in nukechat. How can anyone be a UKMT Goon if they're not willing to kill a thread at a moments notice? What if people bring back Boatchat? Are you not going to Nukechat the thread for the good of all?
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:04 |
|
Phoon posted:im sure it will be soon Do they even need to any more? Their missiles can reach Russia from the US, and I'm sure they have a shitload of subs for when they want to be snuggled up nice and close.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:06 |
|
Fans posted:What if people bring back Boatchat? Are you not going to Nukechat the thread for the good of all? Likewise Boatchat is good if it is discussing living on boats or the use of boats to decrease reliance on airfreight. Boatchat is bad if it is talking about college rowing or your luxury yacht (especially if it's called Morning Cloud).
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:09 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:can we please just have a loving moratorium on nukechat Future transmission from Labour government 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHy8kW632dE
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:11 |
|
We already have a last resort if hit with Boatchat; it's called Crispchat
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:11 |
|
cookingchat is always good.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:12 |
|
Forums Terrorist posted:actually the us wants britain to give up trident iirc The UK, Obama added, "intends to continue to maintain viable nuclear forces into the foreseeable future." It was in America's interest, to continue to help Britain "in maintaining a credible nuclear deterrent". In all honesty, I doubt they care much one way or the other given that our deterrent is the equivalent of a quiet surreptitious fart compared to their thunderous eggy table-rattling monster guff.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:13 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Nukechat is good if it is discussing nuclear power generation. Nukechat is less good if it descends into nuclear annihilation speculation. The morning cloud is what follows me around for the first few minutes after i've woken up.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:13 |
|
serious gaylord posted:The morning cloud is what follows me around for the first few minutes after i've woken up.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:14 |
|
LemonDrizzle posted:http://www.theguardian.com/world/defence-and-security-blog/2014/jul/29/nuclear-weapons-us-uk-cooperation Oh, guess I misremembered. I thought something was linked itt that said the opposite.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:15 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:cookingchat is always good. Apparently the slimy water from tins of chickpeas is a great egg white substitute.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:15 |
|
Forums Terrorist posted:Oh, guess I misremembered. I thought something was linked itt that said the opposite. I recall the "don't give a poo poo about trident" came from whispers from unnamed sources while the "pro trident" obviously comes from a speech from Obama. Given the way America works I think the former is probably actually more credible.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:22 |
|
Forums Terrorist posted:Oh, guess I misremembered. I thought something was linked itt that said the opposite. Probably something along the lines of "The US wants to be the only country in the world with nuclear weapons" which is almost certainly true if never publicly stated.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:23 |
|
Wouldn't a punch in the face lose most of its damaging effects in slow motion? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:25 |
|
Angepain posted:Wouldn't a punch in the face lose most of its damaging effects in slow motion? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder. "Actually ok, but could sound scary if you don't think about it" is a pretty accurate characterisation I think why are we all getting on Moore's back on this
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:28 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:cookingchat is always good. how would you prepare and cook a pigs head
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:28 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ABghHHFv5k If you haven't seen this it's worth watching. Is Eamon Holmes always this rambling and bad? OK MR CORBYN LET'S TALK ABOUT ARSENE WENGER
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:28 |
|
|
# ? Mar 29, 2024 09:53 |
|
Phoon posted:how would you prepare and cook a pigs head I would make sure it was well lubricated with butter, or maybe lard.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2015 14:32 |