|
Heavy neutrino posted:There's god knows how many historical examples of non-state groups establishing states under their control, but Molyneux is a dishonest idiot who can only deny the idea by narrowing it down to the specific example of a modern corporation overthrowing a modern state. Weren't the Dutch/British East India companies basically historical examples of this happening?
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2015 00:57 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2024 10:07 |
|
Cerebral Bore posted:When your utopia literally is warlordism in everything but the name, it might be time to rethink your position. I've always pointed to Somalia and Afghanistan as fantastic examples of libertarian ideology in practice. (Coincidentally, better known as... "Failed states" )
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2015 01:03 |
|
Tesseraction posted:Those don't count because they're not majority white. Yeah, it reminds me of the similar conservative (read: racist) argument as to why single-payer nationalized healthcare only works in homogeneous countries and never could be possible in the U.S. Strangely, I never saw a "You Must Be This Asian to Ride" sign when I got quality, cheap healthcare when I was in Taiwan, so who knows?
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2015 01:16 |
|
Nessus posted:What is very funny to me in a way is that this is usually cited as some kind of axiomatic fact, as opposed to say a post-hoc rationalization of many Americans being quite racist, and being unwilling to improve their situation if it will also help minorities. What's worse is that it's assumed axiomatically because said homogeneous populations are too biologically alien for Western/American medicine so as to be incompatible for single-payer healthcare here. That was more or less the response I got in an argument about nationalized healthcare some odd years ago with a conservative friend of mine.
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2015 16:31 |
|
Cerebral Bore posted:Your scenario relies on unrealistic assumptions about Libertopia. First of all, how would the child have made it past my minefields and automated machingun turrets to get to my SUV in the first place? Someone repost the Libertopia fanfiction where the protagonist scurries past the feral wolves gathered in the lobby of his workplace's office building. [e]: Never mind, I've got it: quote:
Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 21:42 on Nov 7, 2015 |
# ¿ Nov 7, 2015 21:27 |
|
VitalSigns posted:I don't need to be able to give you all the details, because the free market will include the best minds in the country, and once the government gets out of the way, those minds will be unleashed to solve these problems faster and betterer. Couldn't it be argued that an anarcho-capitalist libertarian system incentivizes only the meanest, baddest motherfuckers to the top? Sure, this might correlate with intelligence, but only those best able and willing to consolidate power (ie capital, the means of production, etc) and would immediately set up barriers (physical and economic) to prevent others from encroaching on their accumulated power. The Bush family is pretty good evidence on this story of consolidated power and privilege not resulting in more intelligent or wise guardians of society. As it is, hedge funds and Wall Street firms tend to promote those with psychopathic or sociopathic tendencies. I'm on my phone, otherwise I'd link to these studies. Nevertheless, these are supposed to be the captains of industry and vanguards of capitalism and show, time and again, they are willing to screw over society if opportunities arise (eg subprime lending, manipulating LIBOR, etc). So, given this evidence, why would removing regulations and the State suddenly result in a net boon for society? Why wouldn't said power brokers go "hey thanks!" then pillage society even harder with said checks against their destructive potential removed? Captain_Maclaine posted:Nononono, that would never happened, not at all because, because you see, *loosens tie, runs hair through increasingly disheveled hair* the market would necessarily intervene in those cases where- and I don't mean "intervene" here like those statist men with guns but rather that mutually involved arbitrators who, yes, would need on occasion to be armed, *begins sweating noticeably* but that's not reason to think that devolution into feudalism, which wasn't even that ba, err, uhh HELP THIS GUY'S AGGRESSING AGAINST ME!!! This made me laugh and chuckle a whole lot; thanks for that, friend. Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 00:08 on Nov 9, 2015 |
# ¿ Nov 8, 2015 23:55 |
|
Buried alive posted:1) Praxeology, ergo your evidence is wrong. QED. I get where you're coming from here (tee hee), but taking this approach in good faith: 1.) Wouldn't it be more efficient for society to avoid falling into pitfalls in the first place via proper safeguards and checks against abuse versus letting people get maimed or killed and then learning from others' mistakes? 2.) Wouldn't powerful, established individuals and companies set up barriers to entry for a given gap (eg an old-school-Ford-esque company sell cars only in black and has a monopoly on the market; if you want a different color, gently caress off) to maximize profit/rent-seeking, thereby preventing enterprising individuals the chance to fill other niches in the market? This happens already today in monopoly/oligopoly-controlled markets, so what would stop this in Libertopia?
|
# ¿ Nov 9, 2015 01:34 |
|
That's a lot of words to say "praxeology is axiomatic; I'm right, you're wrong, shut up."
|
# ¿ Nov 9, 2015 08:24 |
|
I was listening to the BBC World Service on my way into work this morning and they were discussing in a group talk about genetic modification with regard to economic inequality, which got me to think about this thread again. Two questions: What is there to stop, given our economic system as it exists now and for the foreseeable future, a minority of genetic 'haves' and genetic 'have-nots'? In other words, one set of the population who can afford to scrub out debilitating genetic handicaps such as Crohn's disease/Down's syndrome/etc and the other segment to be left saddled with such conditions? Or, even further, to select for genetically superior traits to produce a group of privileged Michael Phelps-esque superathlete offspring to compete against the genetically underprivileged? Also, what's to prevent privileged parents from selecting for genetic disabilities (deafness, etc) for whatever reason? One of the speakers fell back on regulations/etc in the UK to prevent this sort of malselection, but what's to stop a 'no gubmint interference in my child rearing!' sadist from consulting with a less scrupulous doctor in, say, a foreign Libertopia that turns a blind eye on this so they can go back and put little Eygore-junior bastard child in their Josef Fritzl basement back home later to abuse? Why do future progeny have to suffer the consequences for something they weren't even around to voice their objections to in the usual "let others learn from your mistakes in dealing with Bad Faith Company" in Libertopia no regulations land logic? That's my inquiry for today, I appreciate the response, thank you.
|
# ¿ Nov 28, 2015 13:02 |
|
I kind of expected that, but I was curious about the kind of answers I'd get. Thanks again. Makes Libertopia seem kind of barbaric the more you dig into it, no? Curiously, said discussion participant was dodging the question on air by saying we already have inequality in ability to pay in today's healthcare schemes already so nothing would change with evolutions in healthcare technology. It's strange how despite advances in technology that should benefit us all, we keep seeing these changes as threats due to being filtered through archaic economic structures. Hm... Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 21:26 on Nov 28, 2015 |
# ¿ Nov 28, 2015 21:23 |
|
paragon1 posted:It's a combination of barbaric and childish. Libertopia is a mix of longing for horrible things we've mostly cast aside or things that never existed in the first place. I don't know if it's longing so much as it is plain ignorance of basic history lessons like Rousseau's Social Contract, feudalism/absence of a strong centralized state, and the experience of the American Gilded Age, among other things. Like, people are straight up asking "it sucks having to pay taxes, what if we tried getting rid of the State, what would happen?" without being aware things like failed states or externalities exist already and can be studied without experimenting for ourselves. Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 22:34 on Nov 28, 2015 |
# ¿ Nov 28, 2015 22:31 |
|
Literally The Worst posted:What I have never understood is why Americans feel so much guilt for screwing the Indians over in the first place. The simple fact of the matter is this: they lost, and we won. Their culture was inferior, and we conquered it. Holy poo poo, Qualnor must have been an awful poster. I'm imagining a literal overweight smug 1800s colonialist complete with pike hat and monocle.
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2015 17:53 |
|
VitalSigns posted:No see those other failed states didn't have a free market, which we would have without a state to enforce contracts, mediate disputes, and keep trade routes clear because I'm sure the mafia can do a better job once they have to compete with the yakuza and the cartels and the Jets/Sharks for my business. But aren't things like mafia/feudal lords/warlords/cartels/etc just non-state actors just filling in the vacuum left behind by an absence of a unified state? Why do they seem to proliferate mainly in areas a state authority can't or won't control? They seem to basically be a state authority functionally (although not in name) but even more chaotic and violent and less accountable. Why is this a preferable alternative? Hell, just look at the period between the collapse of the Chinese dynastic system and the Chinese civil war between the Nationalists and the Communists. It was basically an unending grind of warlords duking it out in areas outside of cities like Shanghai and Peking which led people like Chiang Kai-Shek to prominence in trying to reassert order in lawless areas and others like Mao Zedong to infiltrate said rural areas. In this light, DROs are basically glorified tribes and warlords with a fresh coat of paint. Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 18:11 on Nov 29, 2015 |
# ¿ Nov 29, 2015 18:05 |
|
spoon0042 posted:All that's important is that the state doesn't have a monopoly on force. Yeah, you have to not think about it too hard and ignore how it's never worked out in human history. (Libertarianism in short right there.) Yeah, but that's what I'm saying. Between the alternatives, at least a state monopoly on violence is more predictable and more accountable than a free-for-all between an oligopoly of warlords and gangs where you can be randomly murdered by Gang Blu when they confused you for belonging to Gang Red territory when you're actually Joe Peasant who wants to be left alone.
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2015 18:28 |
|
I don't think hired security in Somalia is exactly competing for your patronage. It's more like a "pay us or die" kind of ultimatum.
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2015 21:56 |
|
This is surprisingly high-quality and entertaining. Thank you for this. You should make this into a regular podcast.
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 16:53 |
|
JRod, if you're still reading this, when DnD posters of varying stripes and opinions who normally antagonize each other on the regular unite to collectively point out why your sociopathic ideology is garbage, it's time to maybe take a step back and rethink things. And then . Don't come back.
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2016 22:46 |
|
Putting in my two cents that Prom. is a sock puppet account of Jrod's. The reg date is too close to Jrod's reappearance and disappearance for it to be a coincidence and it wouldn't be hard for someone like Jrod to forcefully put on a fake posting style to make his alt. account defending himself seem distinct enough to be legitimate. I don't think it's a tactic outside of possibility, especially after his recent growing saltiness.
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2016 01:59 |
|
BaurusJA posted:Just a small add to the misbegotten concept of Libertopia. If a person truly wanted to find a society where personal and individual effort and power determines anything and everything, everything is for sale, and the government does not intervene at all in most things, then one would find the closest analogue in Mogadishu or truly any other failed state/region/city. *insert racist Libertarian argument about how Somalia and Afghanistan don't REALLY count, because reasons*
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2016 19:47 |
|
Nolanar posted:Don't be absurd. Not even mises.org woul-- "Hrm, yes. Violence there is because the government is just invisible. Yes, that's the ticket. "
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2016 21:41 |
|
Here's a question for jrode: Why are you still here? I mean this sincerely: what do you hope to still accomplish here? If it's to still try and convince people about the merits of libertarianism or win people over, I don't understand how you could rationally see that's still possible. You've been posting here literally for years now. Pretty much anyone who posts or has posted in DnD knows about you by now. Despite spending countless paragraphs and pages of posts to (selectively) debate people, there's little if any evidence of you winning people over to your side; if anything, you've only managed to alienate more people and drive people away from libertarianism by demonstrating it as an intellectually and morally bankrupt ideology. At best, you've served as a rhetorical punching bag for people to flex their debating muscles and practice as a living strawman for libertarianism while they still remain unconvinced. At worst, you're a constant target of scorn and contempt as people outright disparage you for your racist, sociopathic views and mock you for being publicly scammed multiple times and illegally selling bootlegged movies while still praising the values and ideology that abused you in the first place. So, again, if you haven't seen any positive gains in your efforts at all in the past several years, why do you still post here? What do you see that you've accomplished from being here at SomethingAwful? What is your rationale for continuing to stay despite being very blatantly unwelcome here? Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 10:18 on Feb 5, 2016 |
# ¿ Feb 5, 2016 10:16 |
|
Rhjamiz posted:This is an amazing question and probably the most important. His ideal business is selling bootlegged Hong Kong DVDs. Case closed.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2016 00:41 |
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:Asked and answered, statist. Yeah, uh, gently caress that Rothbard guy. Every single person is vulnerable to becoming a bum on the street should they run into a financial calamity like having their business (and the loans it depended upon) become bankrupt or, say, a major medical emergency like cancer or a heart attack. Our (lack of a) safety net is the only thing separating paycheck-to-paycheck entrepreneurs from living on the streets, whether they are a Captain of Industry-et-Master of the Universe or Joe the Plumber, no matter how much their inflated ego might tell them otherwise. Hell, even Libertarian poster child Ayn Rand ended up on food stamps and relying on public assistance at the end of her life due to costs arising out of her lung cancer condition. Economic status is a financial state, not a caste.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2016 00:53 |
|
If jrode does not answer my question, I'm going to engage him in memespeak until he does. 5/5 BRETTY GOOD! Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 13:51 on Feb 6, 2016 |
# ¿ Feb 6, 2016 03:56 |
|
Rhjamiz posted:
He has a face more hosed up than Freddy Krueger's.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 01:44 |
|
Grand Theft Autobot posted:Page 74 of This Mighty Scourge by McPherson. Here is the essay in question, The Saratoga That Wasn't. Causing jrod to weep violates NAP, y'know!~
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 05:37 |
|
Hi Jrode! Please answer this: Your Dunkle Sans posted:Here's a question for jrode:
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 07:43 |
|
YF19pilot posted:Also, please answer my question, Would an airplane built by Libertarians have square windows? Or if that's too broad, Would you build an airplane with square windows? Can I go ahead and answer this one on behalf of jrode? The short answer would be something like this: Yes, Libertarians would make airplanes with square windows. In glorious Libertopia, there would be no pernicious government regulation to stifle the freedom and innovation of airplane entrepreneurs. It would be up to the personal preference and discretion of the consumer to choose between planes with square or rounded windows. Less regulation means more freedom of choice! However, there is the sadly unfortunate downside that bad actors who make Somali Airlines-quality planes that tear apart mid-flight would also have a stake. Thankfully, after a few broken planes and some negative reviews on Yelp, the hand of the free market will correct itself and force the bad actor out of business. A few casualties are an acceptable price for freedom. Freedom isn't free, after all. Until then, caveat emptor, my friend! Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 15:18 on Feb 9, 2016 |
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 15:10 |
|
Twerkteam Pizza posted:I do not care if this is the thread where we contain Jrod and therefore this is more relaxed on the rules, but I reported this for racism. This is nothing but straight up racism and if the only punishment that we as a forum can do is give this babbie a time-out than so be it. Yeah, wow, that quote you have is suuuuuper racist. *long whistle* It's not like there have been news reports of Westerners from all parts of the globe leaving to join ISIS for the past several years or anything.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 16:18 |
|
Nolanar posted:Yeah, it's kind of sad to see someone so tied to holding the same positions and being Right about Everything Forever. The thought of having the same opinions I had as a teenager is loving terrifying to me. I'm actually going through somewhat of a philosophical Jrod is not an honest libertarian.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 16:22 |
|
Zanzibar Ham posted:So jrod, what's your genius idea for a business that would make you billions and lord of your castle, if only that dastardly federal state wasn't hampering your ingenuity at every turn? Bootlegged Hong Kong Blu-Rays, clearly. E: We should charge Jrode an hourly rate for as much personal therapy and one-on-one rhetorical (as in, pointing out writing flaws) counseling we've given him for free for years now. It's what Von Mises would have wanted. Free market, biiiiiitch! Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 16:47 on Feb 9, 2016 |
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 16:39 |
|
Man, I keep chomping at the bit with that Jazz music question since I loving love Jazz music and sincerely wish Jrode could see past his blinding racism to appreciate it. How much longer do I have to wait before I can give my answers? I'd tag it with spoilers, promise.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 17:21 |
|
Cingulate posted:To be fair, I think the much more salient islamist terrorists committing murders in the West have so far been exclusively of "Middle eastern ethnicity" and, less common, black, right? From what I understand from the BBC World Service, ISIS is bribing subsistence farmers and others from Sudan and Somalia (I believe) $1,000 USD - the equivalent of a year's salary - to come fight in Libya and Syria. So it's possibly becoming more common for Africans to join their ranks as ISIS exploits the poverty of developing/undeveloped countries. I may have mixed up al-Nusra and ISIS from the report, but you get the idea. I'm sure fade5 or somebody will correct me on the particulars. Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 18:46 on Feb 9, 2016 |
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 18:42 |
|
Igiari posted:I remember that! I recall there being a bit like: The only moral bureaucracy is my bureaucracy.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 19:07 |
|
fade5 posted:Huh, I hadn't heard of that, I had heard that ISIL is sending fighters to Libya because they're getting beaten up so much in Iraq and Syria. I had also heard about Somalis (either refugees or their kids) from Minnesota (of all places) being radicalized and leaving to join ISIL or Al Shabaab: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/12134806/Isil-recruiting-migrant-army-of-the-poor-with-1000-sign-up-bonuses.html I originally heard it on BBC Radio but it looks like it's getting play elsewhere as well. Essentially, it's about ISIS recruiting an 'Army of the Poor' from Chad, Mali, and Sudan with $1,000 signing on bonuses, which is the year's salary I mentioned earlier. Probably better suited for the Middle East thread; but, to tie it to this thread, I'd be interested in hearing Jrode's response on whether this constitutes economic coercion and whether or not that's a real concept to contemplate in Libertarianism (ie NAP) and whether economic violence is a motivating force to him. Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 19:54 on Feb 9, 2016 |
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 19:52 |
|
fade5 posted:Huh, interesting. (And depressing.) I went ahead and crossposted this and my response over to the Middle East thread to continue it there, since Jrod is almost certainly not going to answer your question. It's weird - Libertarians are so obsessed with state violence and the use of force/aggression, but are strangely silent when it comes to economic coercion. To them, it's merely a conscious choice or "ethnic time preference" to work minimum wage jobs and are confused (or worse, give tacit approval of) when you bring up things like income inequality or poverty traps as things that exist. The poor just choose to be poor, therefore it's their fault for being poor and losers in the free market. Hmmmm...
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 20:35 |
|
Who What Now posted:To be fair must jelly belongs in the trash. Jelly is the tool of the Statist, comrade.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 21:03 |
|
Grand Theft Autobot posted:Exactly. Reading between red lines is as simple as black and white.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2016 23:58 |
|
jrodefeld posted:The answer is that I've got some sort of a problem and I don't mind wasting my time writing thousands of words for an un-appreciative audience. I never really expected anyone here to actually be persuaded, though even if they were, they are unlikely to admit it to me. The curtain is pulled back, all is revealed. Thanks for answering me!
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2016 00:54 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2024 10:07 |
|
Something tells me that one of the major reasons for the delay between posts is that Jrode has to artfully sculpt each response to perfection and then admire their beauty and craftsmanship at length before finally clicking on 'Submit Reply'.
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2016 01:47 |