|
i think i should be able to say what i want when i want without fear of reprisal, as is my right as a white man in america. thanks, obama.
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 19:04
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 07:34 |
|
|
ductonius posted:Truly the most i think youll find that is you who has to prove that i am biased at all, and that america is not truly the land of freedom to call for the death of minorities
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 19:32
|
|
poster.
|
OwlFancier posted:As a non-american I will happily describe the primary function of government to be censorship. The entire reason we have a government is because it exists to say that some things aren't allowed. It says dictatorship isn't allowed, it says murder isn't allowed, it's supposed to say that letting people die when we can afford to feed and house them isn't allowed. And sometimes it says that verbally abusing people and trying to incite violence against people isn't allowed. spoken like a true america-hating communazi
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 19:36
|
|
|
paranoid randroid posted:thats, ahhh, some fuckin fresh meat hes cutting there with a real sharp knife, which is exactly the same thing as a gun, which those communist pussy gaylords want to ban
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 19:45
|
|
|
i think you'll find the best way to curb hate speech is to give everyone a fully automatic firearm, because an armed society is a polite society
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 19:47
|
|
|
speech tax? not on my watch, obamao, my speech is FREE
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 19:49
|
|
|
Mavric posted:Freedom of speech is probably overwhelmingly a good idea, but when we have got to the point of protecting the rights of rabid anti-abortion protestors to harass innocent patients trying to receive what should be a private decision (also another constitutional right! But hey its okay to poo poo on that one right?) then I think we might have gone a step too far in the wrong direction. I don't know, it seems the people who scream the most about free speech just want to use it to harass people unlimitedly all while going "I"M NOT TOUCHING YOU HA HA NOW BURN IN HELL FOREEVVERR!" please show me the amendment that guarantees the right to murder defenseless babies, censorailure
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 19:55
|
|
|
Sharkie posted:Oh no, not being able to leave comments on a site sounds awful, have any particularly egregious examples? Also pretty sure comments sections aren't considered protected speech much like I can be banned from the forums for posting about how I think gays are really pieces of Dracula sent to take the world over for the lizard people and it isn't censorship Thanks Obama
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 22:29
|
|
|
I can't scream about the Social Justice menace in the comments of an article about a fifth grade basketball tournament the horror
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 22:30
|
|
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:i'm not confident in your ability to accurately judge substantial content or the relative merit of opinions I mean look at his post history
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 22:39
|
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:I made the mandatory trigger warning joke in the OP but I swear to Christ if you fuckers make this all about gamergate I will lock this thread and push it in the lake. Actual issues that matter please. Stop censoring you hitler
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
Rollofthedice posted:You know what natetimm, you're right. Next time I see "fcuk you you pinko bastard, I hope yuo die in a trench like all the other jwes" I'll be sure to remember not to be hateful, and definitely not to be a tool. How about you stop hating Mexicans and eat a taco
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 22:49
|
|
|
natetimm posted:Does something really voluntarily fall out of popularity when the only people who no longer like it are the thin-skinned pseudo journalists writing the articles? Nobody has ever lamented the trash fire that is comments section before
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 22:52
|
|
|
natetimm posted:He posted in the comments section of a website. which has rules and bans bitter weirdos natetimm posted:When you're in the minority and out of power, the Bill of Rights is a sacred document and worthy of worship that must be obeyed. When you're in the majority and in power, it's an inconvenient speed bump to finalizing the defeat of your enemies. It's working exactly the way it's supposed to. lmao and what minority are you in natetimm
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 23:02
|
|
|
natetimm posted:It doesn't keep me up at night, but I certainly think it's being done so the writers for those sites can present their views without disagreement. my model girlfriend keeps me up at night if you know what i mean, but i certainly think you're insane
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 23:06
|
|
|
Literally The Worst posted:lmao and what minority are you in natetimm
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 23:09
|
|
|
natetimm posted:I think the basic human rights of individuals, including free speech, should trump the interests of institutions. i hate to break this to you but
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 23:19
|
|
|
Literally The Worst posted:lmao and what minority are you in natetimm quoting this until i get an answer preemptive lolin at him ging "i never said i was" despite that being the clear implication
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 23:24
|
|
|
natetimm posted:That statement was a direct response to something another person said, not a declaration of my minority status. There's no mistaking the fact that every time either the right or the left get into power, the Bill of Rights becomes an obstacle to them, and the majority/minority statement I made was in reference to being in the political majority or minority, not some identity politics bullshit. glad i loled preemptively
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
natetimm posted:You are a shining example of a bad faith poster who boils every person with an opposing viewpoint down into some sort of caricature you've taught yourself to intensely hate. Also, anyone who regularly posts in D&D accusing someone of being high on their own farts is projecting all over the motherfuckin' place. Natetimm stop talking to yourself
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 23:50
|
|
|
natetimm posted:The point of hate speech laws is to dress up authoritarian actions as being for your own good. I think this is your subjective take and not objective reality
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:01
|
|
|
Badger of Basra posted:What is natetimm's wondrous policy for protecting minority groups from hate speech? vouchers for thicker (and whiter) skin
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:14
|
|
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:there's no such thing as emotional harm if you're autistic. checkmate, feelings havers i wish 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:17
|
|
|
natetimm posted:Think of the children! wow go gently caress yourself crabman
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:20
|
|
|
natetimm for someone who screams about fee-fees you sure do make some retarded rear end arguments from emotion that aren't actually based in reality
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
natetimm posted:The very root of that argument is that bad ideas should be banned from public discourse. Nevermind the fact that freedom of speech and public discourse is how many of these oppressed groups managed to engineer their upswing, let's neuter these tools as soon as we get the chance! yes you're right saying "niggers are soulless beings shaped from the mud and given an unholy semblance of life by satan himself" is exactly the same as arguing for equal rights
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:31
|
|
|
7c Nickel posted:Hey natetimm, do you remember that time you argued yourself into a corner where it would be "evil" for Walmart to refuse to stock someones collection of drawn child rape fantasies? no, do tell
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
natetimm posted:Hahaha, this is such a transparently bad gotcha. dogg you literally responded to "what about lgbt teens who commit suicide every year" with 'think of the children' you got yourself
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:36
|
|
|
natetimm posted:Because it's a transparent appeal to emotion designed to make anyone who has an opposing opinion look bad. It's a cheap tactic using dead kids to argue a point and I treated it exactly as it should have been treated. no its an actual, visible effect of hate speech that you should consider, and instead you just made a jackoff motion while continuing to talk about how restricting speech is actually bad for minorities gently caress off, twit
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:40
|
|
|
natetimm posted:Again, covered by harassment laws. The teens you're linking are already victims of crimes. Making it extra more illegal is going to do what, exactly? If anything, the advocating should be for stricter enforcement of what we already have on the books. maybe if we punish people, for treating minorities like poo poo until they kill themselves, specifically because they're minorities, we can finally establish that that poo poo is not acceptable in america just a ~crazy thought~
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
natetimm posted:How is making it illegal for idiots to post poo poo on the internet going to stop teens from being bullied and killing themselves when the bullying they are experiencing is already illegal? What is happening is already a crime. Using the faces of dead children to try and enact authoritarian bullshit is way more disgusting than any sort of ambivalence I've displayed to being beaten over the head with it. because it doesn't just happen on the internet you colossal dipshit
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:43
|
|
|
natetimm posted:Hate speech laws aren't going to stop teens and kids from bullying each other. you're an idiot
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:46
|
|
|
natetimm posted:Kids and teens bullying each other to suicide extends beyond hate speech, and making it a hate speech issue is capitalizing politically on the deaths of people to make it about your own personal, pet issue. or perhaps its that hate speech is part of that issue that people wish to curb because it specifically affects those who are most vulnerable not that you give a poo poo you ignorant gently caress
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:47
|
|
|
natetimm posted:Maybe writing laws to put adults in jail over stupid poo poo kids with undeveloped brains do is bad policy. lmao
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:50
|
|
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:it's almost like natetimm is a congenitally retarded person who has a habit of using words incorrectly and is terrified of authoritarian feminism lurking around every corner natetimm what is your exact definition of a comments section
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:55
|
|
|
Istvun posted:Don't hate crime laws in the US just increase criminal penalties for illegal behavior anyways? literally yes
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:57
|
|
|
Small Frozen Thing posted:This thread has certainly been enlightening. Nah we already knew what a shitheel noted gator natetimm was
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 00:58
|
|
|
DAD LOST MY IPOD posted:you are a gigantic dumbass if you think this is true. when was the last time a church in the states silenced critics through civil suits? scientology still exists and is a religion according to the irs
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:20
|
|
|
natetimm posted:Sort of like in this thread where people post pictures of dead teenagers who didn't even kill themselves over hate speech and then tut-tut when I'm not appropriately devastated. except for the ones who did you colossal twit
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 07:34 |
|
|
natetimm posted:It's cute you have this villain persona built up for me in your head. I guess this is the mental justification people without a clue have to go through to assure themselves they're a good person. I'm sorry I didn't provide the correct progressive signalling when someone tried to beat me over the head with dead kids barely related to the issue at hand to win an argument on the internet. except for the kid who was the target of hate speech you mean but i guess it's not hate speech to poo poo on someone for being trans as long as everyone involved is a teenager
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 04:09
|
|