[BSG] Merry Christmas, You Frakking Toasters

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Traditional Games > The Game Room > [BSG] Merry Christmas, You Frakking Toasters

«‹›4 »

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Frakit.

##all through the airlock not a creature was stirring.

# ¿ Dec 11, 2015 08:25

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 17:24

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

##OG Helo.

I'm going to be out for a chunk of tomorrow doing tabletop gaming. Do I need to :f5:

on my phone?

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 01:00

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Podima posted:

Hello I'm Podima, have you read one of my games?

Hi I'm Some Numbers and no I haven't! Are you known for :rice:

games?

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 01:08

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Isn't Greatest Ally the one that went about 100 pages?

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 01:23

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

I've read that thread and I STILL don't know how the frak they managed to get to 70 pages in less than a month. That's insane.

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 01:31

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Podima posted:

The other hallmark of Podima Games is that I start drinking and get hilariously mad at my players.

TOSHIMO AND ARIVIA SHOULD PICK CHARACTERS INSTEAD OF DOING OTHER THINGS THAT ARE LESS IMPORTANT THAN MY BSG GAME ON THE INTERNET!!!!!!!!

On the plus side, if they don't check in, I don't have to be around tomorrow, because I don't get a first turn anyway!

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 05:13

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Cocks Cable posted:

You still gotta play cards into your crisis. Or did you already forget? A classic cylon tell.

Yeah, I guess that's fair. drat.

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 05:23

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Toshimo posted:

Also, round 1 gonna be awful with Helo/Anders combo.

My drawback is way better than Anders'. Go frak yourself.

##Confirm Loyalty.

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 17:11

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

We can't! I can't take an Action!

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 17:42

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Toshimo, you got an InvCom?

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 18:29

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

I'll get this out of the way: ##Take the check, 100%

Blocking DD could be good, unless there's a StP floating around?

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 18:48

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Blocking the DD would be useful, but I'd like the rest of the crew to check in, because Reckless is super dangerous with the new Treachery.

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 20:07

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Toshimo posted:

What's the worst that could happen?

We could get more Raiders and draw a bunch of Treachery? I guess I can't go to Sickbay, but I definitely don't want a Mutiny card on turn 1.

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 20:33

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Toshimo posted:

Some Numbers has failed the sarcasm test. Confirmed toaster.

Sorry, but being in charge of you frakwits while on the surface of other planet and having to dose myself with radiation meds makes me a little testy.

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 20:39

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

##Play 2 high

Heading out, will check in later on my phone.

I still need some help, but not that much.

# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 21:12

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Another small card for insurance would be good. Does anyone have an Declare?

# ¿ Dec 13, 2015 00:12

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Can I Think Quickly after the Declare? I'm fine with either ruling.

# ¿ Dec 13, 2015 03:57

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

If you're cool with it, I'll take the Launch Scout 1 so the check still passes.

# ¿ Dec 13, 2015 06:17

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Toshimo posted:

#reveal

I mean....

## Wander over to the Quorum Chamber
Put those fools to work.

Hahahahaha, super funny joke man!

...

:geno:

# ¿ Dec 13, 2015 15:48

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Use your Static.

# ¿ Dec 13, 2015 16:14

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Oh right. Hmm.

# ¿ Dec 13, 2015 16:47

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

In the base game, only Starbuck and Tyrol start in the Hangar Deck, despite there being 3 pilots.

You need a little variety.

# ¿ Dec 13, 2015 22:59

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

I can play a lot and I'm totally fine with getting checked.

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 00:39

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

I'm going to assume that 4 cards is at or above average.

##Play 1 high

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 01:06

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Podima posted:

Need a PM telling me what this card is.

I keep forgetting that you're not psychic.

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 01:29

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Wow, I missed a lot.

Brony Hunter, you're an rear end in a top hat.

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 02:33

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

If we get Jump Prep this turn, I can hit FTL next turn with my reroll to back it up.

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 02:34

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Podima posted:

NO JUMP PREP

FRAAAAAAAAAAAK.

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 03:00

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

I'm mostly tapped. ##Play 0

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 04:22

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Toshimo posted:

Apparently, Admiral Helo has let us down.

With a heavy heart, I now request that the military turn over Executive authority to the Presidency.

You have my executive permission to GO FRAK YOURSELF

##Draw 2 Lea

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 06:21

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Are you going to return the favor?

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 07:02

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Metos posted:

I can hit weapons control twice including with your reroll if we didn't want to XO forward.

Also have a repair now.

Why Weapons Control once when I can Main Batteries or CIC myself?

Toshimo posted:

Also, would we rather have Command or Armory back online first?

Command, I think.

Cocks? Arivia? Should I trust the President?

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 07:07

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Metos posted:

Uh, because its heavy raiders we're concerned about? Not normals?

We are?

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 08:02

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Metos posted:

We are.

There's two heavies at the launch tubes already, if we get a heavies activation this turn not only are we boarded twice but also two more heavies arrive at the other launch tubes. We have a revealed Grinch who can hit the cylon fleet and activate heavies. We want to make sure we don't get boarded at all or if we do its only one and then that can be ABF'd for free, not spend one of our 2 limited ABFs to get it down to only one heavy at our tubes just to get boarded and sit on the armoury and then start playing how much do dice hate us while the centurions march on and we don't have the backup option of jumping away anymore.

Regular raiders have 2 more activations before we give a poo poo, and our civvies are protected by birds in the air, and I can save them with my static.

Weapons control twice + your dice reroll should take out one heavy, and we're in a much happier position and hopefully get jump prep and fly away from the other poo poo.

I'm still super super confused as to why you're repping Weapons Control. It's really inefficient compared to other methods of Heavy targetting.

Also, Heavy activations are very rare and I think Brony Hunter has played long enough to know that spending a Cylon action on activating Heavies tends to be a waste.

All that having been said, far be it for me to ignore my subordinates.

##Activate Hangar Deck.
##Launch in Mark VII into Foxtrot.
##Play Maximum Firepower, targeting Heavy Raiders.

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 17:39

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Also, before anyone starts accusing me of being silicon, let me remind you that it's literally impossible. There's only two Cylons and Arivia cleared me.

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 17:42

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Arivia posted:

I don't think that's a toaster play at all, for what it's worth. Thank you for knowing the numbers on killing heavies more than me, because I'm still bad enough at this game to think Weapons Control is a good option.

Weapons Control targets a single ship and fires like a Viper at Raiders and Heavies. Weapons Control wasn't a good option BEFORE we gained access to Pegasus.

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 17:48

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Arivia posted:

Yeah I looked at Main Batteries and frowned at it not affecting heavy raiders. You did good, Admiral.

I'll need confirmation, but I think Main Batteries can destroy Heavies on a 7.

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 18:31

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

I can discard.

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 18:32

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Podima posted:

The only things that can destroy Heavy Raiders are Viper attacks, Weapons Control, and the Quorum Card.

Huh, right you are. That's interesting.

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 18:38

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 17:24

Some Numbers: Sep 28, 2006; "LET'S GET DOWN TO WORK!!"

Toshimo posted:

We aren't eating an 8 card discard for 1 Food.

Maybe this would suck a lot less if I could have gotten a frakking XO instead of our Admiral faceplanting 1 Raider (since he'll have to come back in when we jump or risk losing 1 draw every turn).

## Take top.

## Curse Helo.

## Curse Helo again.

You seem to have me confused with a different character. I have no drawback.

Go frak yourself.

# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 18:39

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Traditional Games > The Game Room > [BSG] Merry Christmas, You Frakking Toasters

«‹›4 »