|
When you think about it, global warming would be a great thing for Canada. Only the southern parts of Canada are at all livable, with most of the country a desolate frozen wasteland where hope can neither enter nor escape. Global warming would be the best thing ever for Canadians, it would greatly improve the climate of their country, greatly increase the amount of land that can be farmed, greatly increase the growing season there. Really a net positive all around. Canadians should be all for it.
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 11:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 08:47 |
|
|
Bullshit, it's devastating our snow plow-based economy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 11:46
|
|
|
If you think about it, global warming is really just the true christian god punishing the heretics around the equator for not believing, or for not believing enough. At least that's something I'm sure that Christian conservatives are going to start saying any day now once they have to recognize that it's a thing
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 11:48
|
|
|
canadians are not dying in large enough numbers from tropical disease ihmo
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 11:55
|
|
|
Sashimi posted:Bullshit, it's devastating our snow plow-based economy. The Hockey players 100 years from now will never be as good as the Hockey players you have now. All the robot implants in the world won't make up for it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 12:02
|
|
|
No OP you are wrong, our igloos are melting and we have no where to live anymore
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 12:10
|
|
|
GL growing anything but lichen on that lovely canadian shield
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 12:17
|
|
|
Also, one of the major downsides of global warming is supposed to be that sea levels will rise, and most of the world's largest cities are all on the ocean. Not really a problem for Canada though. The only large canadian city on the ocean is Vancouver, with a population of only 600,000. Probably canadians can build a big dam around the city, or raise all the buildings up on hockey sticks or something.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 12:19
|
|
|
as long as the jet stream continues to carry icy siberian farts from russia to north america canada will stay cold
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 12:31
|
|
|
Lamebot posted:GL growing anything but lichen on that lovely canadian shield When you're sitting out in vast deserts of the US interior (or on a raft out in the ocean that was once the coast), that lichen is gunna be looking pretty good.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 12:44
|
|
|
its already too hot in summer here
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 13:32
|
|
|
Plan: invest in both land in the Yukon and Alberta shale oil extraction companies. Win twice.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 19:55
|
|
|
This is pretty much the reason we keep shooting down international environmental regulations. We figure we can make bank from northern mineral reserves and shipping lanes which are currently inaccessible. That's why we're so salty about establishing northern sovereignty.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:06
|
|
|
Orange Sunshine posted:Also, one of the major downsides of global warming is supposed to be that sea levels will rise, and most of the world's largest cities are all on the ocean. Not really a problem for Canada though. The only large canadian city on the ocean is Vancouver, with a population of only 600,000. Probably canadians can build a big dam around the city, or raise all the buildings up on hockey sticks or something. it's just vancouver. we'd let it go
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:09
|
|
|
lol look at all of of you fuckin brainwashed turds listening to POLITICAL PUNDITS telling you LIES about climate change http://www.heritage.org/issues/energy-and-environment/climate-change look at REAL SCIENCE. lol at you loving mindless idiots. global warming is just a ploy by the democrats to grab more power in washington. cant believe you'are all falling for thiS
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:13
|
|
|
If this happened, the US would go to war with Canada and violently take their remaining land so we can ruin it like we have ruined our land. So probably not so good for Canada.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:13
|
|
|
Actually it would be really bad for Canada because they would face a wave of refugees from now uninhabitable coastal areas and Syrias.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:23
|
|
|
What would you guys say, in the event of a war between the US and Canada, to switch sides to protect your now given universal healthcare and generally non-violent life style. I mean, really, it's what you wanted anyway. And the more states we take, the further south we can make the 100 km from the border situation better.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:28
|
|
|
Stretch Marx posted:What would you guys say, in the event of a war between the US and Canada, to switch sides to protect your now given universal healthcare and generally non-violent life style. I mean, really, it's what you wanted anyway. And the more states we take, the further south we can make the 100 km from the border situation better. I would be a traitor and fight for Canada.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:31
|
|
|
If it's good for Canada then I'm against it
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:32
|
|
|
OctoberBlues posted:If this happened, the US would go to war with Canada and violently take their remaining land so we can ruin it like we have ruined our land. So probably not so good for Canada. Good luck you guys can't invade a sand box what makes you think you'd be able to rock up to our igloo?
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:33
|
|
|
Xenoid posted:Good luck you guys can't invade a sand box what makes you think you'd be able to rock up to our igloo? I didn't say we would succeed, but we sure would kill a lot of people! Besides, as I later said I would be a traitor and fight for Canada.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:34
|
|
|
IMHO Canada should be investing in automated robotic turrets. We can mount some on the deer in case any Yanks try to go through the trees.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:40
|
|
|
OctoberBlues posted:I didn't say we would succeed, but we sure would kill a lot of people! Besides, as I later said I would be a traitor and fight for Canada. I'm not sure who they'd be killing a "lot" of because me, Joe, Larry, and Tom are the only guys in this province. I'm glad you would fight for the side that fights for the living.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:42
|
|
|
Stretch Marx posted:IMHO Canada should be investing in automated robotic turrets. We can mount some on the deer in case any Yanks try to go through the trees. I can imagine many other fine Canadian weapons of war. For example: Moose guided missiles. A large explosive device is placed on a moose, which is sent out towards enemy troops. When the moose gets there, BOOM! Never fails. Maple syrup land mine. A pot of delicious maple syrup is left out as bait for the enemy soldiers. When they go to eat the syrup, the mine goes off.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:45
|
|
|
Orange Sunshine posted:I can imagine many other fine Canadian weapons of war. For example: Wouldn't the maple syrup land mine just kill Canadian soldiers? The syrup is irresistible to them.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 20:56
|
|
|
Orange Sunshine posted:I can imagine many other fine Canadian weapons of war. For example: Why waste the syrup? Just bury the mine in places people walk.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 21:00
|
|
|
Yeah, but then Canada will have to find a new unlivable poo poo hole for its native peoples once their land actually becomes valuable.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 21:06
|
|
|
Kung Food posted:Yeah, but then Canada will have to find a new unlivable poo poo hole for its native peoples once their land actually becomes valuable. Just put them in Vancouver before it completely sinks.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 21:31
|
|
|
Hector Beerlioz posted:If it's good for Canada then I'm against it
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
Orange Sunshine posted:Moose guided missiles.  
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 21:53
|
|
|
nigga crab pollock posted:lol look at all of of you fuckin brainwashed turds listening to POLITICAL PUNDITS telling you LIES about climate change green on the outside, RED in the inside!! http://www.redstate.com/2014/01/16/watermelon-environmentalists-cause-global-warming/
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 22:07
|
|
|
The US doesn't consider the northwest passage to be Canadian territorial waters, it's just not economically viable to makes use of. Yet.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 22:12
|
|
|
Global warming is bad for everybody because even if you get better weather or land because of it there's going to be a lot of SOL people who will be gunning for your stuff.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 22:39
|
|
|
notZaar posted:Global warming is bad for everybody because even if you get better weather or land because of it there's going to be a lot of SOL people who will be gunning for your stuff. In America we have guns for just that reason. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 22:42
|
|
|
Xenoid posted:Good luck you guys can't invade a sand box what makes you think you'd be able to rock up to our igloo? once our snapchat and cable tv stops working we will revert back to our inherent bloodthirstyness
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 22:47
|
|
|
notZaar posted:Global warming is bad for everybody because even if you get better weather or land because of it there's going to be a lot of SOL people who will be gunning for your stuff. Sounds like you need a wall
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 23:30
|
|
|
Climate change is doin great things for Cleveland. Its 64F on Dec 23. We'll probably get a couple good years out of it. Gotta run with the stampede or else get trampled I guess. I'll still do my part and fart less tho.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2015 23:55
|
|
|
global warming owns global shawarmaing would be good too
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2015 00:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 08:47 |
|
|
i like trailer park boys
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2015 00:05
|
|
