|
I dont play games, can i use this thing for work stuff? I want to check my email in 3D
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 01:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 14:35 |
|
|
Blockade posted:I dont play games, can i use this thing for work stuff? I want to check my email in 3D This day will come but you will also need a computer
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 01:34
|
|
|
i must have special powers cause i can already see in 3d without even using this thing
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 01:39
|
|
|
Parallax Scroll posted:i must have special powers cause i can already see in 3d without even using this thing Yeah but do you see Lolita animus licking your balls I thought not
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
NihilismNow posted:I'm going to assume this subsidiary of a company worth hundreds of billions did the math on the optimal price point. Lol buddy you'd be surprised
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 01:47
|
|
|
Boomstick Quaid posted:Yeah but do you see Lolita animus licking your balls I thought not
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 01:53
|
|
|
has anyone pointed out that these things cause brain damage yet
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 01:58
|
|
|
$629? More like Cheat-your-rear end Grift!
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
wow i read they are actually selling these things at a loss . im excited to use one now
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 02:19
|
|
|
I'm selling Palmer Luckey's mama at a loss.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
Leisure Suit Larry 3D
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 02:29
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:also congrats on still being wrong in your tiny little island anyway VR is doa
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 02:45
|
|
|
It beats paying $1500 for something with a lovely field of view: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z800_3DVisor Virtual reality isn't supposed to be like "a 105-inch display viewed at 12 feet", it's supposed to be like being there.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 02:53
|
|
|
Mr. Pumroy posted:ill wait till the wierd sex stuff is developed, op You'll need the Cockulus Grip for $1099 to actually get the real experience of that, though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 02:58
|
|
|
Porn won't save vr
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 03:12
|
|
|
lol if you thought this was gonna cost less than 400 pretty sweet the $275+ backers from the original kickstarter get it for free though (thats not me, tho)
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 03:14
|
|
|
Can someone watch the game you are playing if you are using one of these? Like can they see what you are seeing on a monitor also? It seems pretty isolating otherwise.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 03:24
|
|
|
JediTalentAgent posted:You'll need the Cockulus Grip for $1099 to actually get the real experience of that, though. dawg we are talking vr let's get weird I want tentacle dildos and force feedback leashes round my cock and balls and hydraulic turkey basters u got anything can happen in vr and I want it
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 03:27
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 03:32
|
|
|
this all feels pretty dumb and forced. why couldnt we have gotten some cool future technology instead of another lovely toy?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 03:45
|
|
|
Mr. Unlucky posted:this all feels pretty dumb and forced. why couldnt we have gotten some cool future technology instead of another lovely toy?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 03:52
|
|
|
Mr. Unlucky posted:this all feels pretty dumb and forced. why couldnt we have gotten some cool future technology instead of another lovely toy? The scientists who invented the Holodeck are too busy loving inside of it to share it with the rest of the world.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 04:31
|
|
|
LMBO
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 04:36
|
|
|
wiffle ball bat posted:has anyone pointed out that these things cause brain damage yet they cost 600 dollars. You probably already have brain damage.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 04:41
|
|
|
I don't understand this thread, is $650 supposed to be a lot for high end consumer hardware? because I think u will find that many high end consumer products cost far more than $600, $700, or even $800!!!!
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 06:12
|
|
|
Post more about all the high-end consumer products you're so clearly familiar with I want to live vicariously through your success
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 06:15
|
|
|
rabble rabble posted:I don't understand this thread, is $650 supposed to be a lot for high end consumer hardware? because I think u will find that many high end consumer products cost far more than $600, $700, or even $800!!!! How many of them allow you to look down upon your magical titties while you kill dragons with spoons? although $650 does buy a lot of ketamine.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 06:29
|
|
|
So many poors in this thread lol Lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 06:31
|
|
|
rabble rabble posted:I don't understand this thread, is $650 supposed to be a lot for high end consumer hardware? because I think u will find that many high end consumer products cost far more than $600, $700, or even $800!!!! The problem is that they are hoping for mass adoption. Zuckerberg really thinks that this is the future of entertainment. With a majority of America below middle-class, it ain't happening you tech retards.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 06:34
|
|
|
wiffle ball bat posted:has anyone pointed out that these things cause brain damage yet hosed up if true
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 06:38
|
|
|
Judakel posted:Most first person movement will make you motion sick in VR. Enjoy your racing and flight sims. First person movement made me motion sick (and I don't get seasick) when first person shooters came out. I played Quake 2 in the 90's. Made me uncomfortable for the first few months. The first Unreal engine made the world have a whole different feel. Anyway, you'll get used to it quick and kids will grow up thinking it's normal. Like typing is now. My phone's voice recognition is better than my (phone key) typing skills for simple language now. poo poo changes. Blazing Ownager posted:We're moving to an AR+VR world. We jumped the gun in the 90s. Computing power-wise, yep. We're getting there though. I haven't looked at VR in a while is it still laggy
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 06:57
|
|
|
rabble rabble posted:I don't understand this thread, is $650 supposed to be a lot for high end consumer hardware? because I think u will find that many high end consumer products cost far more than $600, $700, or even $800!!!! It is when most experts were predicting $400-450 max and the CEO of the company said it would be around $350.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 07:20
|
|
|
rabble rabble posted:I don't understand this thread, is $650 supposed to be a lot for high end consumer hardware? because I think u will find that many high end consumer products cost far more than $600, $700, or even $800!!!! most high end consumer hardware is useful for things though
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 07:22
|
|
|
Moridin920 posted:most high end consumer hardware is useful for things though If a technology that allows for more immersive porn and huge advances in teledildonics isn't useful idk what is
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 08:18
|
|
|
so what is the thing exactly? you strap it on your head and then...??
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 08:22
|
|
|
I can't wait to play hearthstone with my 1k OR
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 08:23
|
|
[/img]
|
rabble rabble posted:I don't understand this thread, is $650 supposed to be a lot for high end consumer hardware? because I think u will find that many high end consumer products cost far more than $600, $700, or even $800!!!! It's just bad marketing. In order to sell thing for 600 you have to persuade everyone that it's worth 600 and people will happily buy it because they think it should cost 600. They were throwing numbers like 350 for so long that saying that it's "obscenely cheap" or they "make it at a loss" won't convince me now
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 08:33
|
|
|
I used Google Cardboard (the plastic ones with the headstraps though) and it was really awesome on some of those apps and really made me interested to try Oculus in about 15 years.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 08:33
|
|
|
LGD posted:If a technology that allows for more immersive porn and huge advances in teledildonics isn't useful idk what is The thing is there isn't any for it yet!
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 08:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 14:35 |
|
|
Microwaves Mom posted:The thing is there isn't any for it yet! Isn't any what? porn? Have I got news for you...
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2016 08:53
|
|
