|
PCOS Bill posted:Guns, when used incorrectly or maliciously, are very dangerous, but their utility outweighs the risks of owning them for the average population. Actually they have virtually zero utility, and in fact are worse than nothing at all on the statistical average. Pretty severe error you made here.
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 19:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 03:56 |
|
|
im gay (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 19:16
|
|
|
They have utility of making great threads possible
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 19:17
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:Actually they have virtually zero utility, and in fact are worse than nothing at all on the statistical average. Pretty severe error you made here. Guns have utility in killing animals for food, killing animals for sport, killing other people, killself, deterring people, blowing off steam at the shooting range. Words have Meanings. We agree on the Meanings of Words, so that when we use Are Words they can convey meaning. 'Utility' is one of those Words with Meanings. Perhaps you could try again, because you Got It Wrong here.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 19:34
|
|
|
Guns have the utility of making tezzor really foot-stampingly angry, which outweighs all possible negative impacts.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 19:37
|
|
|
gun gay, so what
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 19:46
|
|
This poster loves police brutality, but only when its against minorities!
|
LeJackal posted:I'm sure you've gone over this with your therapist, but anime is a genre of fiction. Um, afaik it's troika who turned into a gun nut because he watched an anime with cool guns in it
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 19:55
|
|
|
TheImmigrant posted:Guns have utility in killing animals for food, killing animals for sport, killing other people, killself, deterring people, blowing off steam at the shooting range. None of these things are necessary and all can be achieved by other means at vastly lower cost.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 20:02
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:None of these things are necessary and all can be achieved by other means at vastly lower cost. So you can kill other people at a vastly lower cost?  tell me moreedit:  tell me more
Cartouche fucked around with this message at 20:31 on Jan 16, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 20:13
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:None of these things are necessary and all can be achieved by other means at vastly lower cost. You aren't interested in debate as much as standing around yelling and seeing how many people you can come stare at you. You're mentally ill at best, retarded at worst and probably should not be allowed access to the Internet. It really seems to be unhealthy for you. You don't seem to be connected to reality.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
If you feel the need to open carry an AR-15 and three backup pistols at the grocery store you are probably a pussy bitch human being. That is all.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
I think riling up Tezzor is a fine reason to maximize gun ownership.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:None of these things are necessary and all can be achieved by other means at vastly lower cost. Oh yeah I remember this, you wanted to ban hunting and only let government officials cull deer 
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 20:24
|
|
|
I think it was tezzor anyway, sometimes I get the gun pouters mixed up
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 20:24
|
|
|
I think I'd be down for allowing the government to do the hunting as long as it's all done by drones and cruise missiles. Gotta keep in practice for the next war!
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Oh yeah I remember this, you wanted to ban hunting and only let government officials cull deer I don't necessarily want to ban hunting, but issuing licenses to beer-drunk randos is not the only conceivable mechanism of animal population control.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
Panzeh posted:I think riling up Tezzor is a fine reason to maximize gun ownership. Did you ever notice how gun fanboys, who can't read about a proposed ban on assault weapons without declaring it The End of Firearms In America :( and threatening violent insurrection, are always the ones accusing others of being unreasonable and emotional
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:I don't necessarily want to ban hunting, but my political enemies often enjoy it so better just go ahead and ban it anyways
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 21:07
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:assault weapons .......  Tezzor: Putting the emote in emotional, one post at a time
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 21:38
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:In addition, Yah because most people aren't killers
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 21:46
|
|
|
This is always a weird criticism. I didn't pick my political enemies at random. That restricting guns would annoy and inconvenience them is a necessary fact, and not a negative.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
I think the OP makes a good point. has anybody made a sensible counterpoint?
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
various cheeses posted:Were you planning this thread the entire time you were probated? I imagine it would be like not making GBS threads for a month. Did you have to offload your bad opinions on other websites to survive? Is it actually a bad opinion that guns are more effective weapons than knives? I mean maybe you're a crazy anime character who can deflect bullets with knives and throw ten knives at once and hit ten different people right in their eyes but most people aren't violent anime characters and find it much easier to use a gun than a knife if they want to harm a person.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 22:32
|
|
|
eSports Chaebol posted:Is it actually a bad opinion that guns are more effective weapons than knives? Its a simple opinion devoid of nuance or thought, perfectly fitting to a child and their level of argument mid-tantrum. So its no surprise that Tezzor holds to it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 23:18
|
|
|
I thought we were really on the verge of a breakthrough here. Oh well guess we'll have to wait 5 hours.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 23:21
|
|
LeJackal posted:Its a simple opinion devoid of nuance or thought, perfectly fitting to a child and their level of argument mid-tantrum. It's actually wrong, because I could kill over 50,000 gun owners with my sword, and not take a scratch.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
Effectronica posted:It's actually wrong, because I could kill over 50,000 gun owners with my sword, and not take a scratch. A thousand rounds weigh about 28 pounds. Overgenerously assuming that you are a perfect shot, you'd be carrying 1400 pounds with those 50,000 rounds. Perhaps ungenerously, I see you as a weedy and hyperspastic geekshit lab rat, and seriously doubt you could lug those 1400 pounds around with you. Go on, do the FIERCE.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
TheImmigrant posted:A thousand rounds weigh about 28 pounds. Overgenerously assuming that you are a perfect shot, you'd be carrying 1400 pounds with those 50,000 rounds. Perhaps ungenerously, I see you as a weedy and hyperspastic geekshit lab rat, and seriously doubt you could lug those 1400 pounds around with you. I don't think you read that right. He's not the one carrying the ammo in his scenario.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 23:32
|
|
|
PCOS Bill posted:I don't think you read that right. He's not the one carrying the ammo in his scenario. Whoosh.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 23:35
|
|
|
Mofabio posted:Yah because most people aren't killers That's an excellent point  
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
PCOS Bill posted:I don't think you read that right. He's not the one carrying the ammo in his scenario. Not on the outside
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 23:43
|
|
TheImmigrant posted:A thousand rounds weigh about 28 pounds. Overgenerously assuming that you are a perfect shot, you'd be carrying 1400 pounds with those 50,000 rounds. Perhaps ungenerously, I see you as a weedy and hyperspastic geekshit lab rat, and seriously doubt you could lug those 1400 pounds around with you. I guess that one of those Laotian child prostitutes was carrying STDs from a previous American sex tourist and it's gotten to your brain. It's a sad thing to watch the demise of a mediocre mind.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
If tezzor put a gun to his head this thread would never have happen.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2016 00:05
|
|
|
Actually Japanese swords with their composite construction technically have inferior metallurgy to European swords made of spring-tempered monosteel 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2016 00:08
|
|
|
I hope this thread gets moved to E/N, it's where it really belongs imo.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2016 00:51
|
|
|
-Troika- posted:I hope this thread gets moved to E/N, it's where it really belongs imo. So you can get the help you desperately need?
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2016 01:02
|
|
SedanChair posted:Actually Japanese swords with their composite construction technically have inferior metallurgy to European swords made of spring-tempered monosteel Imagine if a trained rodolero faced down the entire NRA...
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Actually Japanese swords with their composite construction technically have inferior metallurgy to European swords made of spring-tempered monosteel Correct. The composite construction demanded more experienced swordsmiths, greater production time, and still had less strength than a European sword. It was all an attempt to compensate for Japan's subpar ore quality and availability. Also samuraboos on foot would get trampled by a heavy cav charge, the crown jewel of European military might for centuries. Check and mate Japanophiles. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2016 01:44
|
|
|
Yeah the 21 foot rule obviously becomes more immediate in the context of winged hussars
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 03:56 |
|
|
Knife pros: -unlimited ammo -instant TKO from behind, two hits from front -lunge attack to access secret areas -cut meat, vegetables, etc. -stealth
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2016 02:10
|
|