|
we're connoisseurs of funny computer here in the yospos, but is there any computer that isn't funny at all? like not a single bit or nibble of funniness in the hole darn thing?
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 02:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 21:39 |
|
|
its u ‼
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 02:08
|
|
|
im not a computer even tho my lack of recognition for common social cues and humans emotions are also common traits with computers
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
Look this somber computer here? can you see it cracking jokes, or even being noticed enough to be the brunt of a joke? this looks like a perfectly unassuming, unfunny computer
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 02:12
|
|
|
pretty much all of them op
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
computers running windows arent funny, theyre sad just like their users 
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
computers are serious business. serious e-business. from ibm.  mainframes are never funny this dude is not kidding around about his business continuity practice he is multiprise 3000-grade serious he's straight-up model 240 parallel-sysplex serious the smile is just to disarm you before he paradigm shifts your punchcard-using rear end 
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 03:41
|
|
|
 *drops mike*
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 03:41
|
|
|
much like
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 03:42
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 05:03
|
|
|
power botton posted:Look this somber computer here? can you see it cracking jokes, or even being noticed enough to be the brunt of a joke? this looks like a perfectly unassuming, unfunny computer i had one of these. it wouldn't start up with more than 2 sticks of ram installed unless there was a special "ram fan" installed. finding that out by accident was very unfunny indeed, op.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
power botton posted:we're connoisseurs of funny computer here in the yospos, but is there any computer that isn't funny at all? like not a single bit or nibble of funniness in the hole darn thing? Therac-25.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:Therac-25. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 05:12
|
|
|
chmods please posted:i had one of these. it wouldn't start up with more than 2 sticks of ram installed unless there was a special "ram fan" installed. finding that out by accident was very unfunny indeed, op. look at this dolt who doesn't know how to rdram
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 06:53
|
|
|
the computer, a massively powerful device that you can use to create or learn almost anything and here we all are shitposting instead if that isn't inherently funny then ive got some bad news
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 08:45
|
|
|
This, anything that runs HPUX is not even a little bit funny, if you ever had to admin one of those pieces of poo poo you need to be checked for clinical depression and suicidal tendencies
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 08:49
|
|
|
the computer powering stephen hawking
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 08:50
|
|
|
   
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 10:43
|
|
|
any computer that has a cookie to forums.somethingawful.com
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2016 11:13
|
|
|
no i disagree, this is very funny it is a blade server that takes as much space and power as a regular server, but still costing more. that's fuckin hilarious. hp. invent.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2016 04:42
|
|
|
yeah blade servers are dumb as poo poo, i remember having to deal with a dell one and an hp one back in the nehalem era i think the hp one was amd back when opterons were still relevant 
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2016 04:50
|
|
|
mishaq posted:i think the hp one was amd back when opterons were still relevant no that is a current hp product you can buy today it takes up four "server bays" in an hp blade chassis. so you can choose between 8 itanium2, or 48 xeon cores in the same space. slow, bulky, and expensive? that's hp innovation
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2016 04:59
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:no that is a current hp product you can buy today lol there are probably some federal government contracts that specify blade servers must be used keeping this garbage alive looks like the same backplane/chassis i was dealing with in 2008 same for dell's poo poo: http://www.dell.com/us/business/p/poweredge-m1000e/pd
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2016 05:03
|
|
|
mishaq posted:yeah blade servers are dumb as poo poo, i remember having to deal with a dell one and an hp one back in the nehalem era server hardware is outside of my realm of knowledge. my "server" at home is a micro-atx case with some ram, hard drives, a pentium processor, and debian. edit: oh, it's apparently not just a regular rack-mounted server
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2016 05:39
|
|
|
craisins posted:what is a blade server? is it just a server that goes in a rack as opposed to a standalone tower server? a common chassis servers can share power/cooling and with the fancier ones, network and other IO by exposing their pcie lanes to specialized interfaces there were a couple years where they gave you some density advantages (fit 8 U worth of servers in less than 8 U) but in general they just cause more problems than they solve
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2016 05:45
|
|
|
the main problem that they solve is too much money in your wallet
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 21:39 |
|
|
mishaq posted:lol this is no ordinary blade server though it's an hp proprietary unix blade server, so it's 1/10th the density of an actual blade. now you can combine all the dubious advantages of blades with all the obvious downsides of proprietary unix poo poo from the 1990s
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2016 05:54
|
|