Haier posted:

Nauta posted:

Zazi posted:

I don't get the sense of "oh my god a country being taken over by feminazis and mooslems" that these pictures seem intended to evoke. Instead I get the sense that Sweden actually just has a sincere belief in the validity of allowing people to express themselves, and that those people expressing themselves are themselves subject to that belief, as opposed to the lip-service NIMBY approach usually seen

Like, "hey, yeah, this school where gendered pronouns are banned. May as well see what happens" or "yeah white women you can wear headscarfs if you want, and even invite people to do the same thing, you do whatever makes you happy" or "huh, this performance artist is evoking serious reflection and commentary with her work" - none of it seems as though there's a legitimate chance of it overtaking the status quo, but you could see it being reasonably accepted if everyone fairly decided it should be.

I mean, hell, can you really say that there are no issues at all with the status quo being a function of the white majority?

Also what the hell Australia that some serious HDI going on

Zazi posted:

Also what the hell Australia that some serious HDI going on

Fonzarelli posted:

lol@ americans living in a 3rd world squalor hellhole while australia stays top tier for the rest of my entire life

Zazi posted:

I don't get the sense of "oh my god a country being taken over by feminazis and mooslems" that these pictures seem intended to evoke. Instead I get the sense that Sweden actually just has a sincere belief in the validity of allowing people to express themselves, and that those people expressing themselves are themselves subject to that belief, as opposed to the lip-service NIMBY approach usually seen

Like, "hey, yeah, this school where gendered pronouns are banned. May as well see what happens" or "yeah white women you can wear headscarfs if you want, and even invite people to do the same thing, you do whatever makes you happy" or "huh, this performance artist is evoking serious reflection and commentary with her work" - none of it seems as though there's a legitimate chance of it overtaking the status quo, but you could see it being reasonably accepted if everyone fairly decided it should be.

I mean, hell, can you really say that there are no issues at all with the status quo being a function of the white majority?

Also what the hell Australia that some serious HDI going on

Dave Concepcion posted:

lol you are sunburnt brits, enjoy relying on imports to have anything non-repulsive to gently caress

Fonzarelli posted:

we have waaaaaay more babes per capita than america could ever dream of omg

Zazi posted:

I don't get the sense of "oh my god a country being taken over by feminazis and mooslems" that these pictures seem intended to evoke. Instead I get the sense that Sweden actually just has a sincere belief in the validity of allowing people to express themselves, and that those people expressing themselves are themselves subject to that belief, as opposed to the lip-service NIMBY approach usually seen

Like, "hey, yeah, this school where gendered pronouns are banned. May as well see what happens" or "yeah white women you can wear headscarfs if you want, and even invite people to do the same thing, you do whatever makes you happy" or "huh, this performance artist is evoking serious reflection and commentary with her work" - none of it seems as though there's a legitimate chance of it overtaking the status quo, but you could see it being reasonably accepted if everyone fairly decided it should be.

I mean, hell, can you really say that there are no issues at all with the status quo being a function of the white majority?

Also what the hell Australia that some serious HDI going on

naem posted:

Marv Albert posted:

Fonzarelli posted:

we have waaaaaay more babes per capita than america could ever dream of omg

drilldo squirt posted:

I don't see the link, what religion is being hostile to infidels?

Surah Al-Baqarah posted:

191. And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Haram (the sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.

192. But if they cease, then Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

193. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allah (Alone). But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)

Surah At-Taubah posted:

5. Then when the Sacred Months (the Ist, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islamic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikun (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salat (Iqamat-as-Salat), and give Zakat, then leave their way free. Verily, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Prav posted:

lilljonas posted:

E: Konung is more fancy-pancy, the king's title is officially Hans Majonnäs Honungen, while "kung" is more everyday speech and/or generic term for kings.

Zazi posted:

I mean, hell, can you really say that there are no issues at all with the status quo being a function of the white majority?

OhYeah posted:

Someone needs to page all the people from the now extinct ScandiPol thread here for some Godlike triggering.