|
Can the Senate really block Obama's appointee to the point where it becomes irrelevant due to the next elections?
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 19:51 |
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2016 00:01
|
|
|
vyelkin posted:https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/698649076691173376?lang=en Now that's poetry. 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
First it turns out Xander is a criminally violent drunk, and now this. 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2016 02:41
|
|
|
Quorum posted:No, no, we don't want Associate Justice Rubio. Sinners Sandwich did say AI.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2016 06:49
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:Associate Iustice. I meant to contest Rubio's intelligence. I failed, and now must perform seppukku. 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2016 07:03
|
|
|
Thug Lessons posted:It would constitute significantly more political control than the 0% they currently have. Short of national referenda on justices I think delaying appointments until after the next election (including by-elections) would probably be the best way to give popular control over the Court. There is structurally no popular control over the Supreme Court. It is as the Founders intended.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2016 07:58
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 19:51 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/paulwaldman1/status/699268113825718272/
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2016 02:39
|
|