|
thanks for reposting buzzfeed trash, op
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 20:54 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 09:16 |
|
The article OP posted is down, and the one linked as the original source (http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article59389341.html) states the following:quote:Of 7,600 applicants and recipients, about 2 percent were referred for drug testing. The 21 positive tests represent less than 0.3 percent of the people screened. I don't get where you came up with the numbers for the title of this post.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 20:56 |
|
im going to own ppl on facebook with this info
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 20:56 |
|
What's the racial breakdown on these stats
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:02 |
|
935 posted:The article is misleading. It counts the total number screened vs the total number failed, but doesn't mention that the screening process is dead simple to cheat (just circle NO, I don't use drugs) and not everyone screened gets tested. I actually read about this from a meme posted by someone on Facebook - the meme was right, the numbers check out. I don't understand how receiving supplemental living benefits (aka, "welfare") is associated with positive results from an invasive drug test. Perhaps you can make the case for me, because I just don't connect these things. Seems like some kind of police state action to me. Love, Vitalis
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:06 |
|
935 posted:I'm as liberal as they come, all drugs should be legal, we shouldn't legislate what poor people spend their money on. Well you see captian liberal, THEY ARN'T SPENDING THEIR MONEY!
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:15 |
|
this just in, drugs are cool thanks gbs rss
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:19 |
|
I know a guy who not only has sold me weed before but seems to smoke a ton of it posting poo poo about how welfare recipients should be drug tested. His reasoning is that "our taxes shouldn't go into handouts and to fuel drug habits" and I'm like, okay fine... ...then I pointed out that he's an independent workman who does like roof work and air conditioning and doesn't he get paid under the table most of the time when he comes aboard for larger jobs? Who is getting those taxes? Then he deleted all of the Facebook comments and reposted the image five minutes later.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:23 |
|
man i wish i had some illicit drugs. instead i have to settle for rubbing scented oils into my ballsack to get "high".
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:24 |
|
8-Bit Scholar posted:I know a guy who not only has sold me weed before but seems to smoke a ton of it posting poo poo about how welfare recipients should be drug tested. His reasoning is that "our taxes shouldn't go into handouts and to fuel drug habits" and I'm like, okay fine... the only moral drug use is my drug use
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:24 |
|
dreezy posted:man i wish i had some illicit drugs. instead i have to settle for rubbing scented oils into my ballsack to get "high". pinch off your sack until you get dizzy its cheapest
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:26 |
|
Shinjobi posted:I don't believe in welfare drug tests for people without kids, but I do believe in drug tests for people that are responsible for a child. I realize this is nitpicky shades of gray stuff, but in the event of a failed drug test officials could at least see if there's anything wrong with the family in question. You want to drug test literally everyone who is a parent? Ok, but they have to go into a meat grinder if they fail, to provide food for those who don't do drugs.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:39 |
|
it sucks to be poor and the government should be paying 100% of my drugs is this the reaction you wanted op
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:41 |
|
If paying for welfare programs keep me from getting pick pocketed more, loving fine with me.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:42 |
|
Professor of Cats posted:If paying for welfare programs keep me from getting pick pocketed more, loving fine with me. isnt this literally the same thing though
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:43 |
|
Inept posted:You want to drug test literally everyone who is a parent? I don't think this is what I said but I like your idea more anyway.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:48 |
|
i think its ok if they only do a little drugs
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 21:57 |
|
They should combine welfare, the truman show, and the discovery channel. To get welfare you must be on a new tv show on discovery that follows you around and puts everything you do on tv.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:05 |
|
eat the rich
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:11 |
|
code:
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:14 |
|
Wouldn't be very expensive to drug test all welfare recipients? Does this article say how much all of these tests cost? Well if 70 percent of people failed to show up maybe it was pretty cheap after all
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:14 |
|
People love to bring up that Florida already did this test and it doesn't matter. Wanna know what Florida is also booming with, fraud.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:17 |
|
Tenzarin posted:They should combine welfare, the truman show, and the discovery channel. I like where this is going, but it sounds like it would be a lot of work to monitor.. and it might not be that entertaining. Maybe some of the poor people can be given the job to watch the other homeless people, and they get rewarded for snitching. When they get this great job, they won't need welfare anymore! But to make sure they're not cheating the system and not reporting their fellow...well, you know... people...if they don't keep up a strict minimum quota, they will be fired without the ability to collect unemployment or welfare.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:19 |
|
maybe we should load them up into boxcars and take them to forced labor camps and then murder them en masse when they are no longer productive
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:22 |
|
this morning I conducted a full scientific study of the NC population to determine if they were pedophiles 99% of the sample declined to answer (did not appear at the testing site) 1% of the sample said no he is not a pedophile shocking statistics from NC; back to you GBS
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:23 |
|
dad gay. so what posted:maybe we should load them up into boxcars and take them to forced labor camps and then murder them en masse when they are no longer productive this but for fats and uggos.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:23 |
|
.random posted:I like where this is going, but it sounds like it would be a lot of work to monitor.. and it might not be that entertaining. No being on the show only gets you welfare.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:24 |
|
gently caress you OP
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:42 |
|
The current welfare bureaucracy is preferable to mincome because at least the callous welfare recipients have REAL jobs
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:48 |
|
The OP got the numbers wrong? Color me shocked! I am picking myself up off the floor, where I most certainly was!
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:51 |
|
not only is the profoundly retarded op wrong about the numbers, he keeps insisting he is right despite all evidence to the contrary. the dumb gently caress believed something he read on facebook and will always believe it because it confirms his biases despite being mostly fictional. kill yourself, op. it is the only good thing you could possibly do with your life.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:56 |
|
What percentage of welfare recipients do you think can "out math" the OP?
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:57 |
|
I love the people who's response to welfare drug testing is to test everyone in the U.S. Senate. Like they are somehow involved in state level welfare drug testing. Also way to cement your argument by classifying what kind of people you will subject to this. Your pee is your own business no matter who you are.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 22:59 |
|
OP saw a facebook meme and thought to himself: "this seems factual enough to share with other people."
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 23:01 |
|
If it's good enough for grandpa it's good enough for GBS -The OP
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 23:03 |
|
ManDingo posted:I love the people who's response to welfare drug testing is to test everyone in the U.S. Senate. Like they are somehow involved in state level welfare drug testing. Also way to cement your argument by classifying what kind of people you will subject to this. Your pee is your own business no matter who you are. I plan to transition to working by selling my pee
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 23:05 |
|
Later on, OP will reveal a fail safe algorithm for determining the name of your cell phone.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 23:09 |
|
OP how do you feel about the wealthy? Would you both suck a dick and lick a shoe?
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 23:12 |
|
ManDingo posted:I love the people who's response to welfare drug testing is to test everyone in the U.S. Senate. Like they are somehow involved in state level welfare drug testing. Also way to cement your argument by classifying what kind of people you will subject to this. Your pee is your own business no matter who you are. As if some Senator is going to fail a piss test like some yoyo running the fry baskets at McDonalds. I hope Donald Trump whips out his dick at his inaugeration and pisses all over the front row then goes "EVERYBODY HAS TO TAKE A PISS TEST TO LIVE IN USA NOW"
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 23:12 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 09:16 |
|
Neutrino posted:Yep, we should just throw these poor bastards doing illegal drugs into jail. That will teach them. Of course it will cost taxpayers more than just giving them welfare checks but if that is the cost of keeping drugs out of welfare, we will have to bear that cost. And we should definitely require more drug testing because obviously that expense makes it worth it for taxpayers. God Bless America. Drugs should only be reserved by white people that can afford it. how many non us american women are worht being chopped in to pieces as a consequence of the drug trade in your mind? i'd say none but i actually have a soul.
|
# ? Feb 16, 2016 23:18 |