|
CelticPredator posted:It's a silly scene. For every reason stated. Doesn't mean it can work for you though. Like, a lot of people hate Chappie, but it worked for me, even the end which is kind of dumb and doesn't make a whole lot of sense, still holds up in an endearing way. you know that everyone would bitch about superman sounding like an 8 year old boy if he said "mom" instead of "martha". Plus, we know from MoS that he's more of a "my mother" type from that scene where he punches the poo poo out of Zod.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2017 05:33 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 03:28 |
|
teagone posted:Crossposting something I wrote a few months back in BSS. Man, forum search feature is so much better than I remember it lmao. batman was beating the poo poo out of him, he didn't really have time for a whole speech edit: Hodgepodge posted:Maybe it was just the build-up, but when I finally saw that scene it didn't seem weird at all it is the "WELCOME TA EARF" of comic book movies.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2017 05:58 |
|
Dark_Tzitzimine posted:There's already a rumor that WB is eying Ryan Gosling as Affleck's replacement. This rumor also says that WB isn't sure on how proceed with the change yet, either use Flashpoint to change actors or cast Gosling as Dick Grayson and make him took over the mantle. this might sound really dumb, but I can't see Ryan Gosling as an acrobat. every film I can think of where he gets into fights he's a real scrapper, bare-knuckle fighting sort of guy. Blade Runner, The Nice Guys, Only God Forgives, Drive, etc. He's not a jumpy flippy fighter. Gosling would be a great Two-Face, honestly. Or Hush, or Clayface maybe. God I'd kill for a Matt Reeves directed Batman movie where Batfleck faces off against a Ryan Gosling portrayal of Clayface. edit: actually Gosling has the face and demeanor of a hard-scrabble detective who is down on his luck, maybe Harvey Bullock would be best. DC Murderverse fucked around with this message at 09:21 on Nov 14, 2017 |
# ¿ Nov 14, 2017 09:18 |
|
Dark_Tzitzimine posted:In what it can only be the start of an endless amount of rumors, now is being said that Reeves is eyeing Jake Gyllenhaal to replace Affleck, with the idea of The Batman being moved to the Elseworld line of films or making it a prequel to BvS gyllenhall would be a terrible replacement for Affleck's Batman, but probably a good replacement for Bale's Batman. Gyllenhaal would also be much better served as a Bat-villain of some sort though. Like, that dude as Riddler? Dope as hell.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2017 00:27 |
|
Pirate Jet posted:We won't. I know everyone in CineD keeps hoping for this but it's never going to happen. Justice League was straight up unfinished when Snyder left, the only way something like that happens is the Superman 2 situation and the internet has already decided it likes Snyder way way less than Richard Donner. i hope they're happy with what they get. i can't imagine someone watching Justice League and thinking "yes this is a better, more well-made movie than Batman v Superman" but apparently those people exist.
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2017 05:43 |
|
BENGHAZI 2 posted:its hard to be worse than beavis i mean, in terms of pure filmmaking, JL is way worse. Content is more subjective (and also you're wrong).
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2017 06:09 |
|
Megaman's Jockstrap posted:Anyway look at what they've done with Blade Runner and Army of Darkness, if they think there is an audience there I'm sure they'll do it. I think the most obvious parallel to draw is the Donner cut of Superman II. quote:Original production Stuff like bringing in another director prior to the first leaving, having to replace/pad out the score, some actors not being able to do reshoots, changes in physique, and a revised screenplay all sound very similar to what happened here. The obvious big difference is the reason for the director leaving. Donner was forced out, Snyder left after a tragedy. As a reminder of how long these things can take, while the TV cut added in about 17 minutes of mostly Donner shot footage, we didn't get the actual Richard Donner cut of the movie for 26 years. And even then they had to take some of Lester's shot, some new visual effects and a screen test of Reeve and Kidder to get the thing completed. That's probably about where the Snyder cut is at the moment. You could probably make most of a movie out of it, but to really make it work you'd need to do some more VFX stuff and maybe even still use some of Whedon's footage. And it should also be pointed out that Superman II, even with all of it's production troubles, is still a movie that most people really like. Justice League is alright at best and it will take a very long time, if ever, for a re-evaluation of BvS (i do think it's already happening for Man of Steel).
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2017 00:21 |
|
Mechafunkzilla posted:There's a craven, cowardly pro-gun control senator who keeps getting sick burns dropped on him about how he's a hypocrite for hiring armed security guards. And then there's a scene where the a CCW-carring reporter could have taken out a terrorist and saved the day if only she hadn't been forced to take her gun out of her purse going into a hotel room to interview said senator. The only thing stopping a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a shitload of guns, PTSD, and a rage disorder
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2017 05:14 |
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Ok so I just got to see Justice league and here's my serious review of it. Before I review, wow, the situation was dire there, a BigD screen with maybe two dozen people there. Though this is SEC country and it's a Saturday. Diana absolutely has a pathos about her mother did you not watch the first act of Wonder Woman? Hers weren't really in JL but every single person in the Justice League has severe parental issues and they should all go to group therapy together. That can be the sequel.
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2017 05:38 |
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Their therapist is Granny Goodness After their hour is up (after only 45 minutes, because she's evil) she closes the door and all of a sudden Darkseid is just chilling on the couch.
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2017 05:45 |
|
The MSJ posted:JL also current has the best user rating for a DCEU movie after Wonder Woman. There are a lot of people who really like the Marvel formula and didn't care for MoS and BvS who are really happy that a movie with Batman and Superman came out and wasn't like those two, to the point where they just kind of ignore how ugly and stilted the movie itself was. Actually my reaction to JL compared to the reaction of others has really shown me just how much more aesthetics matter for me in movies than for other people. Like, I can't forgive a movie that looks as bad as Justice League does, but a movie with some really pretty shots in it can be worth a watch even if there's not a lot else to it.
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2017 03:14 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:Having to list some super lovely movies in there to make the comparison. No, he had NO characterization and his motive was super clear. Not because it was a rip-off of every superhero movie, but the plot was (and I am SHOCKED nobody's calling this more) directly inspired by loving TRANSFORMERS: DARK OF THE GODDAMN MOON. I can't believe I'm going to be the guy correcting statements about the plots of Transformers movies, but Age of Extinction is the one where the villains were trying to terraform earth to make it habitable for their race. Dark of the Moon had the Decepticons trying to teleport Earth to Cybertron's atmosphere so they could rob all of the resources from Earth and enslave humanity. Blazing Ownager posted:I think this thread is mostly populated by hardcore Snyder fans who think Wheedon broke their previous movie rather than Wheedon coming in and trying to bail water out of a sinking ship to make something remotely watchable under a 2 hour mandate with half completed footage. Whedon was brought in to work on the script and dialogue with Zack Snyder, which is what Joss Whedon excels at as a filmmaker. He got the director job after Snyder left because he was a guy on set who already had blockbuster experience, knew the script, and would be able to get stuff done by the time they needed it done. The studio had him do a bunch of extra "fixes" that resulted in a bunch of scenes set in tiny uninteresting rooms that were lit poorly because he's not a good visual director, and probably had a very limited budget. It's not really Joss' fault that he got hired to do something he's not very good at considering he was originally brought on to do something he's very good at. He didn't break the movie, the studio did.
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2017 04:19 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:Ah, yep. I definitely stand correction. They are all one big blur of twisting metal and crunches after the first one sometimes to me. I have no idea how I managed to see all of them up until the Knight one... I knew this off hand because Dark of the Moon is the best Transformers movie by a long shot, and is probably one of the best huge blockbuster movies of the last decade. I agree with you about Steppenwolf though. There are very few comic book movies that truly compelling villains and it's mostly because they're disposed of by the end of the movie. The most memorable ones are ones that are allowed growth and coexistence (see: Magneto, Loki). There are good single-movie villains but they're much fewer and farther between (Nolan and Raimi are the best at these, but shouts to Spider-Man Homecoming who had a really good villain, but he may show up in the next one, so who knows).
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2017 04:27 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:Avengers was way more competent than this poo poo. Hell, even Age of Ultron, which I thought was one of the weakest Marvel movies ever, was more competent than this poo poo. Avengers looks like butt. It's a well written movie (because Whedon is a good writer and when the character's voices are already right near your comfort zone it's easy to write them) but it looks on par with the Agents of SHIELD pilot in terms of how it looks. Age of Ultron looks better but is not as well written, I think because at this point Whedon was having fights with Marvel about the direction they wanted the movie to go. There's a reason he stopped doing Marvel movies after AoU.
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2017 04:35 |
|
Snyder is probably the best comic book movie director working right now. If you set aside scripts for his movies and just focus on how things are shot, look, set up, the visual aspect of his movies, I'd put 300, Watchmen, Man of Steel and Batman v Superman up against any other comic book movie and they'd come out looking better. The only other movies that have as strong a visual style and feel like comic books as much as Snyder's movies are Raimi's Spider-Man movies.
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2017 04:39 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:Oh I'll give you that. I don't hate Snyder: I liked Watchmen a lot, for example. I'm gonna be honest here, I never got the complain that BvS is hard to understand. At this point I've seen the movie enough times that it's like obvious to me, but I saw it opening night in a theater in Milan with Italian subtitles below everything (because as funny as watching the Italian dub would be, that just wasn't gonna happen the first time) and I understood it just fine. there are a few scenes that I don't like much and it's not as good as Man of Steel (which is the gold standard of modern superhero movies) but I feel like the people who say they don't understand it are just being willfully obtuse. At least the people who just don't like the portrayal of Superman and Batman are engaging with the movie somewhat.
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2017 04:48 |
|
Blazing Ownager posted:Lex Luthor's motivation was never clear. He wanted the two to fight, for reasons. And stuff. He also just had all this info for no reason, like who Superman's mother was or about Batman and all that crap, but I'll hand wave that. But here's the big "yeah this is stupid as gently caress" stuff off the VERY top of my head and there IS more: Lex: He's a rich kid who only got negative attention from his dad (beatings, etc) and there was no one to save him so he distrusts the idea of an all-powerful, all-benevolent being who just wants to save people. He wants to get rid of Superman because he thinks that anyone with that much power will eventually abuse it, so he puts a few plans in motion to do this, one to destroy him physically (Doomsday), and the others to destroy him in the eyes of the public (wanting him to kill Batman, setting him up in Africa/DC). Batman: He's been fighting crime for 20+ years to little/no effect, seen his sidekick murdered by a crazy person, and on top of that, now there's an all-powerful being from some other planet who totally wrecked the city of Metropolis that everyone loves, but Batman has no trust that someone with that much power won't end up turning evil, so he thinks he needs to destroy Superman before he turns because when someone that powerful turns evil, he could rule the entire world. The two of them are two sides of the same coin: traditional powers (rich white dudes who are powerful business/criminal justice figures) who, when confronted with a power far beyond their beliefs and scope, react with fear, because they believe that any being with that much power will eventually crush the world beneath him, and because they don't actually know him, they believe that as an alien, he has no connection to earth and wouldn't think twice about taking over with an iron fist.
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2017 05:14 |
|
Superman is just having to grapple with the negative ripples of his positive actions. His dream dad's story about horses and hero cake is a pretty good summation: we try to do good for the people we love, even though there's a possibility that there are some negative outcomes to it. Superman is playing with that on a global level, so even when he goes and saves people (like from an invading Zod who wants to destroy Metropolis out of spite), there is collateral damage, and there are people who, because they're affected by that collateral damage, think that the net result is not worth the price they personally had to pay (as shown by Jimmy Smits).
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2017 05:17 |
|
the fact that some people treat liking a movie that most people don't like as if you're shoving your dick inside a horse or something is hilarious. "i went and saw these people talking about a movie and get this - they liked it! what sort of crazed mad men like this movie that most people don't like? don't they know that broad public opinion says that it sucks? they must be lunatics."
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2017 07:38 |
|
WENTZ WAGON NUI posted:well this is a real letdown You should read the whole article, it's slightly more nuanced than "no more movies ever"
|
# ¿ Nov 21, 2017 06:14 |
|
LesterGroans posted:Glad Snyder won't have anything to do with a solo Flash film. He'd probably end up just running around and hurting people. Counterpoint: You wouldn't get this from any other guy: https://twitter.com/nellucnhoj/status/931278859936370688
|
# ¿ Nov 21, 2017 07:14 |
|
LesterGroans posted:It's still really annoying that we didn't get a moustached leather daddy Superman. my god he is so handsome. just like, a gorgeous man.
|
# ¿ Nov 21, 2017 07:19 |
|
got any sevens posted:Yessss, jlaw owns i know it's a cliche at this point but please give me Lexi Alexander's Batgirl
|
# ¿ Nov 23, 2017 01:42 |
|
Scarlett Johansson is aging into Uma Thurman and it’s great. She’s gonna star in movies forever.
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2017 21:33 |
|
WENTZ WAGON NUI posted:Right. The corollary of this is that no movie, from Underworld 7 to Salo to A Serbian Film to Hostel to My Little Pony: Pinky Pie's Day Off, is "just [for] fun." That itself implies a success or fail state, "was the movie successful, a balance of creativity and fidelity to the Eli Roth-Reboot My Little Pony shared universe?" Actually a movie is successful if it evokes a concordant response in you like, now I want to go create my own thing, even if that thing is just a scathing two thousand word essay against Zack Snyder's worship of chromed male abdominals. All that the binary question creates is Culture War bullshit or, "what do the Seahawks draft first: O-line or wideouts?" O-line, duh. Baldwin and Richardson are fine, their OL is a trash fire.
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2017 01:47 |
|
it's gonna be her still pining over Steve Trevor, obvi. He's on contract for a couple more movies. I think it would be silly to try and include a real love interest in there.
|
# ¿ Dec 2, 2017 07:07 |
|
Jenny Angel posted:He's also just a genuinely unpleasant and loathsome person to be around, which is a big change of pace from a lot of comic book villains that try to be imposing or cool first and foremost just like the real mark zuckerberg!
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2017 05:24 |
|
Burkion posted:If you seek his monument, look around you. this is no poo poo my Facebook cover photo. it's really cool and captures more in one moment (the entire memorial in that scene) what Justice League spent about half of its runtime trying to showcase
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2017 05:50 |
|
this looks like a scene from an Arrested Development-esque sitcom about Superman. it's my favorite gif
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2017 04:07 |
|
Brother Entropy posted:an animal suddenly talking at a dramatic moment is a pretty funny idea though it is. that moment had multiple moments where nostalgia tugged at the heartstrings, but when Pikachu actually talked everyone in the theater let out a muffled "i know this isn't funny but I can't help it" laugh. It helped that the voice was like, really high pitched and annoying, which isn't so bad when it's saying what are ostensibly animal sounds, but actual words sound hella weird coming from it. It was real goofy.
|
# ¿ Dec 5, 2017 22:52 |
|
GonSmithe posted:No one knows what Battle Angle Alita is, are you kidding me? and if you do find that one i'd suggest getting away from them quickly before they show you their body pillow girlfriend
|
# ¿ Dec 9, 2017 05:46 |
|
hiddenriverninja posted:get ready for white akira we have been one successful anime adaptation away from white Akira for decades it feels like, but one never shows up i don't think it's impossible, but every time hollywood tries they seem to gently caress something up. i even liked GitScarJo but it was definitely not successful
|
# ¿ Dec 18, 2017 02:25 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 03:28 |
|
Detective No. 27 posted:Beavis might be the first movie I watch in 2018. hey if you figure out what time you'd have to start the movie to have Superman touching down before his fight with Batman start right at midnight tell me so i can ring in the new year right.
|
# ¿ Dec 30, 2017 06:37 |