|
Greg Hardy is here to play laywerball:
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 18:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 03:35 |
|
|
Yeah domestic violence is barely a problem in the south, for sure Greg. Fiz come get ya boy
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 18:50
|
|
|
 What a fucktard.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 18:52
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Greg Hardy is here to play laywerball: It never ceases to amaze me that the message still hasn't quite sunk in for Greg that the best, if not only course of action for him at this point would be to literally feign inability to speak English when confronted by reporters.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
fsif posted:Half-expecting a two-games suspension from Big Rodg anyway. im expecting 4 games tbh
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Greg Hardy is here to play laywerball: This is a level of self unawareness and retarded delusion I could only wish to achieve. Shame I don't want to beat up any chicks
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
4 RING SHRIMP posted:Shame I don't want to beat up any chicks don't knock it until you try it
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 19:19
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JasonColeBR/status/717051265839071233
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 19:20
|
|
|
Greg Hardy continues to keep himself out of the league What a piece of poo poo
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 19:22
|
|
|
So Niners QB situation remains Gabbert vs. Kap and Denver looks like they're starting Mr. Buttfumble?
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 19:23
|
|
|
Okay well I guess have fun earning none of those escalators then guy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 19:29
|
|
|
Thaddius the Large posted:It never ceases to amaze me that the message still hasn't quite sunk in for Greg that the best, if not only course of action for him at this point would be to literally feign inability to speak English when confronted by reporters. Mr. Hardy, we've been talking for 20 minutes, I know you're not a deaf mute.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 19:44
|
|
|
"Quiet bitch or I'll hit you...I mean,....no speaka ingles"
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 19:45
|
|
|
In this league gently caress taking a pay cut. Wonder if the NFLPA was in his ear about demanding his full salary.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 19:45
|
|
|
swickles posted:In this league gently caress taking a pay cut. Wonder if the NFLPA was in his ear about demanding his full salary. Yeah no poo poo. Kap isn't going to bet on himself again. People will be falling all over themselves next year too.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 19:47
|
|
|
God such a poo poo show if Kaep is your best option at QB. Suddenly that rumor about Miami and Denver having been in contact about a draft day trade makes sense.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 19:51
|
|
|
AAA DOLFAN posted:God such a poo poo show if Kaep is your best option at QB. lol if anyone actually believes that Miami is going to trade away Tannehill
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 19:53
|
|
|
Ehud posted:lol if anyone actually believes that Miami is going to trade away Tannehill It was Denver trading up to #13, contingent on a few things obviously
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:01
|
|
|
AAA DOLFAN posted:It was Denver trading up to #13, contingent on a few things obviously Denver's really intent on having maybe a 1st and a 7th plus whatever comps they have and that's it for the year.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:09
|
|
|
Chip's special brand of football autism is going to collide with Kaepernick's football retardation and they will fuse to unfuck Kaepernick I truly believe this* *I do not believe this. Go Nine-(wins over two years)-rs
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
whypick1 posted:So Niners QB situation remains Gabbert vs. Kap and Denver looks like they're starting Mr. Buttfumble?
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
So as a relatively new fan of football and the Lions specifically (3 years), I was wondering: have the Packers ever been... bad? Like I'm expecting the Patriots to be bad soon for better or for worse, and they were historically a relatively bad franchise I believe. I think it's time for god to gently caress the Packers basically
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:46
|
|
|
Knyteguy posted:So as a relatively new fan of football and the Lions specifically (3 years), I was wondering: have the Packers ever been... bad? Like I'm expecting the Patriots to be bad soon for better or for worse, and they were historically a relatively bad franchise I believe. I think it's time for god to gently caress the Packers basically 70s and 80s mainly.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:49
|
|
|
Knyteguy posted:So as a relatively new fan of football and the Lions specifically (3 years), I was wondering: have the Packers ever been... bad? Like I'm expecting the Patriots to be bad soon for better or for worse, and they were historically a relatively bad franchise I believe. I think it's time for god to gently caress the Packers basically From the early 70's until the mid 90's they were football siberia where players threatened to retire rather then be traded there. Favre suffered that fate, then Reggie White un-hosed it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
This reminds me, what was that site that showed each franchises cumulative winning percentage as a bunch of shaded triangles? I know it was posted here, I just don't remember when or how to even look for it otherwise I'd just search the archives.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
Knyteguy posted:So as a relatively new fan of football and the Lions specifically (3 years), I was wondering: have the Packers ever been... bad? Like I'm expecting the Patriots to be bad soon for better or for worse, and they were historically a relatively bad franchise I believe. I think it's time for god to gently caress the Packers basically Sure, they've had some rough stretches. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
Knyteguy posted:So as a relatively new fan of football and the Lions specifically (3 years), I was wondering: have the Packers ever been... bad? Like I'm expecting the Patriots to be bad soon for better or for worse, and they were historically a relatively bad franchise I believe. I think it's time for god to gently caress the Packers basically They were pretty bad in the late 80s, until Favre appeared in the early 90s.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
They were average to bad for a long time, with few winning seasons, from the end of the 60s up until they got Brett Farve.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
Knyteguy posted:So as a relatively new fan of football and the Lions specifically (3 years), I was wondering: have the Packers ever been... bad? Like I'm expecting the Patriots to be bad soon for better or for worse, and they were historically a relatively bad franchise I believe. I think it's time for god to gently caress the Packers basically Things were relatively bleak through the 70s and 80s. If you wanna go way back the mid 40s through the 50s were bad too. But yeah, since 1992 they've had a grand total of 2 losing seasons. e: beaten even to the pfr link. So yeah what they said.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
Packers went 4-12 in 2005, and I think this was in spite of scoring more points than allowing
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:52
|
|
|
sam bradford lmao posted:Packers went 4-12 in 2005, and I think this was in spite of scoring more points than allowing Nope, scored 298, gave up 344
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:54
|
|
|
The Philadelphia police union has some words about the DA's decision not to charge McCoy: http://www.fop5.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2016_04_04_12_29_44.pdf   blue lives matter
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:56
|
|
|
whypick1 posted:Nope, scored 298, gave up 344
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 20:57
|
|
|
fsif posted:The Philadelphia police union has some words about the DA's decision not to charge McCoy: http://www.fop5.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2016_04_04_12_29_44.pdf fsif posted:In New Jersey as arrest was made for a video recording C'mon fellas, at least give it a once over for typos.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
sam bradford lmao posted:Gah, must've been another season then. 2008?  And conversely, negative point differential and winning record:  edit: Bah, PFR query is a little screwy, those only cover this decade. Nevermind, click these: Negative Point Differential, Winning Record (which Green Bay did have in '13) Positive Point Differential, Losing (or .500) Record whypick1 fucked around with this message at 21:09 on Apr 4, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 21:01
|
|
|
Blarfk posted:C'mon fellas, at least give it a once over for typos. I spent too long trying to parse that sentence.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 21:02
|
|
|
whypick1 posted:Nope. These are the only teams with losing records with positive point differentials: That Titans season was hilarious. They started 5-2.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 21:04
|
|
|
Blarfk posted:C'mon fellas, at least give it a once over for typos. BLARFK- WHAT'S THE DEAL ???????
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 21:04
|
|
|
fsif posted:BLARFK- 
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 21:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 03:35 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2016 21:20
|
|