|
Cannot stop laughing at this. Finally ai is justified You're welcome, page 2 slicing up eyeballs fucked around with this message at 02:08 on Apr 7, 2016 |
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 20:49 |
|
|
This thing's deductive powers are amazing. The first caption I got that didn't involve surfboards or giraffes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 02:50
|
|
|
 Spot on, Microsoft.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 03:10
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 03:36
|
|
|
Phobic Nest posted:This thing's deductive powers are amazing. wow
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 04:20
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
it caught corn.jpg as inappropriate. well played, computer.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
It just said that a picture of my cat was "inappropriate content" and that it would not caption it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 04:31
|
|
|
Lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 04:57
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:00
|
|
|
you did five stars is how you did
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
This thing can't even see really obvious smiles. Come on, why did they let this thing out into the wild? It's so not ready.Jonesy posted:Cannot stop laughing at this. Finally ai is justified The algorithm has promise, but so many flaws.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:07
|
|
|
The service seems to be doomed to failure because it downscales the hell out of any image you give it to the point that there's very little of the important, differentiating data left to it. The original was 1200x1600, but the algorithm only works on this little thumbnail. edit: I also notice they crop the contrast on the image, so that the part under the smurf's hood is quite a bit darker than in the original image. edit: did I say cropped? I meant to say compressed. One of those nights. Prettz fucked around with this message at 05:31 on Apr 7, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:17
|
|
|
MrMoo posted:Why does Microsoft love to advertise it is completely inept at using their own cloud services? the labs/think tank/new-ideas crews probably get a total of 0.00000001% of microsoft's resources so all they can do is plink poo poo on a single server and say SEE IT GOT SLASHDOTTED ITS POPULAR so they can beg for a couple more scraps of r&d money
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:24
|
|
|
this is pretty decent, except it doesn't recognize two REALLY REALLY easy to recognize faces. It was also able to ignore the bottom half of garbage that the site fed it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:27
|
|
|
Remember when ms released a twitter AI bot and 4chan turned it into a Nazi?
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:31
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
OUCH "et. al."
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:35
|
|
|
now that this thing is working reliably for me I have a lot of experiments I want to conduct
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:41
|
|
|
What's the story with this pic, I've seen it before and never known what it is.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:43
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:43
|
|
|
StoneOfShame posted:What's the story with this pic, I've seen it before and never known what it is. That photo was taken by her killer right before the murder.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:45
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:47
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:49
|
|
|
StoneOfShame posted:What's the story with this pic, I've seen it before and never known what it is. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
The first several posts in this thread made me think this thing was a math machine at recognizing famous faces. But as I put more and more of them at it (most of them with boring results) I got pretty discouraged. But now I'm encouraged again.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
Three of the past 5 things I've tried to upload began with "a couple of giraffes". They've got some issues regarding pattern recognition..
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 06:05
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 06:12
|
|
|
It works really well for photographs, but it thinks that anything animated or hand drawn is surfboards and giraffes. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 06:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 06:22
|
|
|
This this is really awful, the more pictures I feed it the less impressed I am. Nearly all of them are either really stupid answers, or answers that are a little bit correct but ultimately boring and not funny. awful ability to detect a girl's face  this is okay-ish  this is a spectacular failure  how can you miss Teddy Roosevelt's face? What the gently caress. All of the historical famous pictures I throw at it are a letdown. It always gets at most one of the people correct and ignores the rest. Super boring.  Seriously what the gently caress is with the "couple of giraffes"???
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 06:39
|
|
|
I thought it's response to the X-Wing was  but yeah, not quite ready for prime time.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 06:48
|
|
|
 I don't know who Anthony Mackie is  Not sure what I was expecting with this one, but it's not a good result because the algorithm ignores easily scannable text  Yet another recurring description. How many pictures will it give this description to?  Reminder that humans cannot understand anything without boatloads of context and a gigantic amounts of prior experience. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 06:58
|
|
|
Stop showing it anime and cartoons. It thinks all cartoons are skateboarding/surfboarding/snowboarding giraffes. Must be a 90s kid.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 07:01
|
|
|
A work of art.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 07:08
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 07:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 20:49 |
|
|
StoneOfShame posted:What's the story with this pic, I've seen it before and never known what it is. shes on spring break
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2016 07:14
|
|
