|
exactly 1/2 of all the ppl i ask have split polarized opinions i initially didnt think much of it at first, but upon a 2nd viewing 12 years later i think this was a good movie
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 15:44 |
|
|
duh
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:30
|
|
|
What're you doing today Napoleon
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:31
|
|
|
It had it's moments but was mostly overshadowed by how dumb it's fans were.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:31
|
|
|
your mom goes to college
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:31
|
|
|
it's like gay porn. i'm not into it, but i could see how others would be and don't hold it against them.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:32
|
|
|
Yes, it was good. Unless you are one of those people who hates good things that are popular, then it's overrated and bad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:33
|
|
|
i watched it once, thought there were a couple of funny parts, didnt see what all the fuss was about, never think about it unless it is directly brought up then it fades from my memory again as quickly as it came. that's my review.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:33
|
|
|
I watched it drunk and didn't laugh so I'm guessing it was bad 
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:36
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:I watched it drunk and didn't laugh so I'm guessing it was bad same
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:37
|
|
|
IDK.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:37
|
|
|
thathonkey posted:i watched it once, thought there were a couple of funny parts, didnt see what all the fuss was about, never think about it unless it is directly brought up then it fades from my memory again as quickly as it came. that's my review. namaste
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
mostly it just reminds me that I like tater tots
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:41
|
|
|
Don't care but enough to post
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:42
|
|
|
nah it was bad. the fans are worse
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:42
|
|
|
i watched it when i was high and i couldnt enjoy it because all i could think about was how stoned the characters seemed sincerely, enfeifl
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
IMO it's a fun movie to talk about, but the process of actually watching it is somewhat painful
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
uncle rico is still hilarious and if you don't like uncle rico, gently caress you.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:45
|
|
|
It is an extreme example of success from right place right time
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:47
|
|
|
drat horror queefs posted:It is an extreme example of success from right place right time Exactly. It captured a certain feeling and comedic style that worked in the moment. That said, there isn't much of a reason to watch it more than once. Serious postin' about Napoleon Dynamite.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
drat horror queefs posted:It is an extreme example of success from right place right time this. but its still funny in a nuanced way that only really smart people understand (like me)
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
The jesus kids in high school loved that movie so I always assumed it sucked.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
Colon Power posted:The jesus kids in high school loved that movie so I always assumed it sucked. no it has funny characters
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:55
|
|
|
has anyone involved in the movie (actor or otherwise) gone on to do anything successful afterwards?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
the only thing that brought it down was the guy who played the jock who really stuck out from the rest of the movie imo. at first i thought the problem was the character itself but later realized they did a terrible job casting the character while they managed to nail everyone else. if he were played by a better casted actor he would have fit in just fine
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
BUT MY LIPS HURT REAL BAD
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:59
|
|
|
no
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 21:59
|
|
|
i enjoyed it
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:00
|
|
|
how much you wanna bet i could throw a football over them mountains?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:01
|
|
|
Colon Power posted:The jesus kids in high school loved that movie so I always assumed it sucked. It's a good movie on its own but I didn't see it for a long time cause of this nice clean comedy featuring a vegetarian actor eating a steak and discretely removing it from his mouth
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
i can't remember op so we'll just have to file this one under "we'll never know"
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
I think it got too popular for its own good, but yeah, it was a good movie.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:05
|
|
|
not bad for its time,did not hold up
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:09
|
|
|
Nefarious 2.0 posted:how much you wanna bet i could throw a football over them mountains? The delivery of that line sold it to me and probably best explains why I like the movie. There is nothing in that movie which I find outright hilarious but there is something I find enjoyable about the scenery, characters, and character interactions
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:09
|
|
|
WhyteRyce posted:The delivery of that line sold it to me and probably best explains why I like the movie. There is nothing in that movie which I find outright hilarious but there is something I find enjoyable about the scenery, characters, and character interactions I've seen a lot of people say that line in particular was hilarious and the character himself was funny and I never understood wtf they were talking about, thanks for this explanation
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:12
|
|
|
its very dry
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
like my balls
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
I'm sure it appealed to some demographic but that demographic, whatever it is, is very small lilliputian, even
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:16
|
|
|
SciFiDownBeat posted:I'm sure it appealed to some demographic but that demographic, whatever it is, is very small smart people who have a sense of humor as opposed to people who are literally just crusty old stinky socks in a corner
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 15:44 |
|
|
you, for example
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2016 22:19
|
|