|
Kevlar v2.0 posted:Toews/Backes Hey look I was right.
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 14:46 |
|
|
and the own goals have it
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
Own goals WINS
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
Ah sweet release
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
FUCKIN CALLED IT HOMIE
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
Poonerman posted:prediction: blues win the first two games, drop the next four 
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:33
|
|
|
 ALL IN LINE WITH MY PREDICTIONS TODAY
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
hahahah what a lovely goal
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
TVR with the OT game winner for the Blues
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
HAhahahaha, Backes scores despite again not trying to shoot. That was a cross ice pass that hit TVR's skate.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
Cool I like this this is good.  May the blackhawks go down the way of the bruins: via deflected own-goal: colon
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
Reverend Sub-Zero posted:Scoring goals by putting defensemen through the loving glass. drat GJ
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
grack posted:Kane/Own goal S'right bitches Of course the Blues score a goal that was an attempted pass.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
Crappy ending. But If the Hawks and Blues play like this the rest of the series the Hawks will be fine, especially with Keith coming back.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:35
|
|
|
Blues win despite having I think 3 shots on goal. holy I messed this comment up
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:35
|
|
|
This series is going to be so fun and heart wrenching at the same time
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:35
|
|
|
35 shots and no goals. Hawks goi to get swept in 3 games somehow.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:36
|
|
|
Reverend Sub-Zero posted:So this game has to end with an own goal. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:36
|
|
|
These idiots better just start firing everything on net when they enter the zone on Friday
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:36
|
|
|
Ummagumma posted:Crappy ending. But If the Hawks and Blues play like this the rest of the series the Hawks will be fine, especially with Keith coming back. How is Keith going to improve on 35 shots and no goals
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:37
|
|
|
Blues out in 5, will average under a goal per game
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:37
|
|
|
Oh well, poo poo happens I guess. At least it was a 69 minute game. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:38
|
|
|
Nail Rat posted:How is Keith going to improve on 35 shots and no goals Your best offensive defenseman can help generate scoring, particularly on the man advantage.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:38
|
|
|
Ummagumma posted:Your best offensive defenseman can help generate scoring, particularly on the man advantage. It shouldn't take an offensive defenseman to score ONE GOAL IN 35 SHOTS. Elliot is not price or Patrick Roy
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:40
|
|
|
The Blues had decent possession but absolutely refused to funnel pucks to the net
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:42
|
|
|
Eh I'm not too worried. Hawks defense looked solid without Keith and they outshot the Blues by a ton in regulation. Hopefully Elliott comes down to Earth.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:42
|
|
|
Nail Rat posted:It shouldn't take an offensive defenseman to score ONE GOAL IN 35 SHOTS. Just about any NHL goalie can have a good game, it happens. If your team is very unlucky, it might happen over the course of an entire series (like Mike Smith in 2012).
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:43
|
|
|
If both teams play the entire series the way they played this game, Hawks are going to win.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:44
|
|
|
Jordan7hm posted:If both teams play the entire series the way they played this game, Hawks are going to win. Mostly because the Blues won't take any shots on net.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:47
|
|
|
I think yea you have to assume that if a team has 2 regulation SOG then they will lose. But if the Blues decide to use their eyes while shooting the Hawks are done
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2016 05:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 14:46 |
|
|
Woops
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2016 03:53
|
|
