|
Presumably the question being asked was prefaced with "if you couldn't use money you already have" but they just didn't say that in the final statement because it's not as attention grabbing.
CJacobs fucked around with this message at 23:15 on Apr 21, 2016 |
#
¿
Apr 21, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 02:35 |
|
|
Parallax Scroll posted:how does that make sense VendaGoat posted:So wait. I really doubt 47% of the people asked don't have any savings to speak of. It just seems exaggerated to me, and what I assume is that it was phrased to get rid of "I already have the money" as an answer. I wish we could read what the questions were phrased as specifically but I skimmed the article and didn't see it anywhere. Chomp8645 posted:It doesn't make sense and CJacobs is a retard. If that was the question then every respondent would say they would borrow/sell something or be unable to pay it. It would be 100%, not 47% What the gently caress else could you do? I now realize the logical fallacy in the wording I chose in my post but I still really doubt that statistic isn't exaggerated.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2016 23:19
|
|