|
I don't get that attitude. You can use the masonry to suss them out easier.
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 06:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 23:39 |
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:I don't get that attitude. You can use the masonry to suss them out easier. Yup, much easier to get a feel for real reactions/etc in real time chat in a google doc.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 06:38
|
|
|
I do agree that the reaction is weird. Both of them are acting odd, but I'm inclined to believe them for the moment, at least that they're masons. This feels too shaky and bizarre to be a scum gambit. Though I really have no idea what to think alignment wise.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 06:42
|
|
|
I have been on planes all day, will mafia tomorrow
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 07:51
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:I do agree that the reaction is weird. Both of them are acting odd, but I'm inclined to believe them for the moment, at least that they're masons. This feels too shaky and bizarre to be a scum gambit. This is fake. ##vote PMush
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 08:33
|
|
|
Like, literally, for real, that is the fakest "reaction" I have seen in a mafia game in a looooooooong time.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 08:34
|
|
|
Here's a thought, JakeP, what does your role PM say about our relationship and how you feel about me and such?
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 08:36
|
|
|
For whatever it's worth, I think a masonry could be useful to suss out thoughts and arguments away from public view. If it's unconfirmed, a town mason could pick up on things. I mean, I'm not about to vote on bullshit D1 claims, but I don't think masons are as useless as people make them out to be.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 10:45
|
|
|
That said, the one mason doc I ever had that was worth anything had, like, ten masons in a twenty-five player game. I still think a good mason could be a good mason. There's no reason to out it. Sure, alignment is unconfirmed, but what is confirmed is that you get to bro out beyond public view. You shouldn't out that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 10:47
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:That said, the one mason doc I ever had that was worth anything had, like, ten masons in a twenty-five player game. I mean I wouldn't have outed it generally but the fact that we both claimed miller and are both masons is interesting, something to consider, and frankly something I felt the town should be aware of. I am a pretty open book player, what I think is what I say in the thread.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:13
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:Here's a thought, JakeP, what does your role PM say about our relationship and how you feel about me and such? That we are brothers, and the reason we can talk out of thread is because you trust me, but that otherwise you no nothing about my role. I could see how you read the trust thing and thought we were confirmed, but I am pretty sure that is just flavor as to why we can communicate out of thread
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:17
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:This is fake. I agree with this though ##vote pmush
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:18
|
|
|
I'm feeling conflicted about that, honestly. If you are both town then scum may just kill you for outing yourselves as Masons, unless they just push the narrative that we should get rid of the millers asap. If you are scum that's a good gambit to start off with because it throws us in a lurch. Like, you should be able to at least work out your misgivings in the mason doc before bringing this to us, because that is an easier channel to see where a player is coming from.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:18
|
|
|
:smokes a bowl: who's masons?
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:19
|
|
|
On the other hand, both your posts feel genuine so JakeP likely just got paranoid. Anyway, ##vote pmush
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:19
|
|
|
i think this bandwagoning is fake
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:20
|
|
|
I have to remind myself that not everyone that plays this game has nothing else going on in their life and likely don't pay as much attention to things.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:20
|
|
|
Max posted:I'm feeling conflicted about that, honestly. If you are both town then scum may just kill you for outing yourselves as Masons, unless they just push the narrative that we should get rid of the millers asap. If you are scum that's a good gambit to start off with because it throws us in a lurch. lol why would the scum kill 2 miller masons thats absurd I don't have "misgivings", just information I felt the town should have. I'll do my scum hunting in the thread not in a google doc
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:21
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:i think this bandwagoning is fake "Pmush is scummy" Kash: "Yo hey hold up." Do you not think Pmush's post was wishy-washy in a bad way?
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:21
|
|
|
Unconfirmed masonries as a mechanic are worse than thunderdome abilities hope this helps
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:22
|
|
|
JakeP posted:lol why would the scum kill 2 miller masons thats absurd That's lame and I'm sad rng gave you the masonry.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:22
|
|
|
Max posted:"Pmush is scummy" I don't think scum makes themselves that obvious right out of the gate
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:23
|
|
|
Max posted:That's lame and I'm sad rng gave you the masonry. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrWz7pWMlEA
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:23
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:I don't think scum makes themselves that obvious right out of the gate Some people just can't help it
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:24
|
|
|
Maybe idk.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:25
|
|
|
I feel like Quids is genuinely annoyed here and Jake is just being standard Jake, eh? It would take a pretty good case to make me want to vote either of them, eh? I don't really care for PMush's comment because that line about not knowing what to think 'alignment wise' feels forced and self-conscious, eh? However, I think one thing we can all agree on is that Hal is always scum, eh? ##vote Hal
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:26
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:I don't think scum makes themselves that obvious right out of the gate This feels like a dodge. Pmush's post is wishy-washy and self-concious, and ignoring it for that reason is lame and suspicious.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:26
|
|
|
Kash scum to prolly or Kash scum pmush town, id vote kash
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:27
|
|
|
Max posted:This feels like a dodge. Pmush's post is wishy-washy and self-concious, and ignoring it for that reason is lame and suspicious. I didn't get self-conscious from that post at all
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:27
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_2xIpcMBiI
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:28
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I feel like Quids is genuinely annoyed here and Jake is just being standard Jake, eh? It would take a pretty good case to make me want to vote either of them, eh? Calling a player scummy and then throwing down a dumb vote on someone who hasn't even checked in since the day started. Cool.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:28
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Kash scum to prolly or Kash scum pmush town, id vote kash Nah after many games of scum I am finally town again
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:28
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I feel like Quids is genuinely annoyed here and Jake is just being standard Jake, eh? It would take a pretty good case to make me want to vote either of them, eh? This, however, is bad. "I think this person is scum, but I'm gonna joke vote."
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:29
|
|
|
Max posted:Calling a player scummy and then throwing down a dumb vote on someone who hasn't even checked in since the day started. Cool. Wait, saying something feels forced and self-conscious is now calling someone scummy, eh? If I had wanted to say PMush was scummy, I would have called her scummy, eh? Forced and self-conscious does not always equal scum, eh?
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:29
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:Wait, saying something feels forced and self-conscious is now calling someone scummy, eh? No, but it is suspicious, and throwing a vote on Hal feels like you are trying to push momentum off of someone.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:30
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:Wait, saying something feels forced and self-conscious is now calling someone scummy, eh? "I don't really care for Pmush's comment" I mean you are heavily implying you don't like this comment from them and that it comes from a bad place.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:31
|
|
|
Like, subtext is a thing that exists in our lives. Pointing out something is wrong with a post without a qualifier implies you think it's scummy. Why point it out, otherwise?
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:31
|
|
|
Everybody scum
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:34
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Everybody scum That's the secret isn't it
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 23:39 |
|
|
If that were true the game would end the moment it started.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 14:35
|
|