Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Hyperlynx
Sep 13, 2015

Governments can't even crack off-the-shelf cryptography in any reasonable timescales. That's why they're getting so pissy about the public having access to end-to-end encryption via things like Whatsapp.

So if well-funded government intelligence departments can't crack publicly available technology, it's a reasonable assumption that the general public can't crack them either. Though security researchers do their best to try.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Hyperlynx
Sep 13, 2015

thrakkorzog posted:

Most of the old codes were designed by people who were sponsored by rulers, and kept their codes secret in case their secrets fell into enemy hands.

These days most modern day cryptologists tend to open source their ideas, and ask for any obvious loopholes.

It's possible that the NSA has cracked a few codes without publishing everything. But that doesn't mean they've cracked everything, and they would like to keep that mix secret.

Yes, that's part of it. The modern approach to cryptography is that it must be secure even if the attacker knows every detail of how the encryption works - the only secret is the encryption key. If knowing how the cypher works is enough to break it then it's a poo poo cypher.

  • Locked thread