|
effectual posted:Peyton for trying to sweep his hgh and teabagging stuff under the rug and plugging budweiser after his defense gifted him the trophy, etc. Haha, this made me decide to compare Manning's performance in each Super Bow with the Broncos because I had a hunch he was actually better in the Seattle game. Turns out that hunch is right times a billion: vs. Seattle 34/49 280 yards, 1 TD, 2 INT, 1 sack for 1 yard, QB Rating 73.5 vs. Carolina 13/23 141 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT, 5 sacks for 37 yards, QB rating 56.6, 1 fumble lost God drat he was loving terrible in that game.
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 06:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 18:59 |
|
|
You had a hunch he was better in the Seattle game huh? Did you also have a feeling Custer was slightly undermanned?
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 15:39
|
|
|
NC-17 posted:You had a hunch he was better in the Seattle game huh? Peyton was also poo poo in the Seattle game, but that was a team failure in all 3 phases of the game.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 16:25
|
|
|
He was playing from behind the whole time and had to force a lot of poo poo. I don't think he played particularly poorly, his team just totally buried him, like you said.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 16:31
|
|
|
He also had a lot of garbage time poo poo including the TD in the Seattle game
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 17:11
|
|
|
NC-17 posted:He was playing from behind the whole time and had to force a lot of poo poo. I don't think he played particularly poorly, his team just totally buried him, like you said. He played pretty poorly. He had both interceptions in the first half and was basically unable to complete anything past like 5 yards downfield. The second int was also a pick six that put them down 22 and pretty much ended the competitive parts of that game... But man, yeah, that was a failure in all three phases. Right after the pick six, they almost fumbled away the kickoff, then the 2nd quarter ends and the 3rd quarter starts with that kick return TD. Then the next time they get into Seattle territory, Demarius fumbles it and a broncos olineman gets an unnecessary roughness.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 17:34
|
|
|
Cavauro posted:i nominate a little child I have diligently added this, but I suspect it will be thrown out for vagueness. swickles posted:I would like to either second Tom Brady, or simply go with Pats fans for trying to sue to get the draft pick back and also for this comedy gold: I've seconded both for you, but you used the word "either" for some reason, perhaps because you're under the misapprehension that you're only allowed to nominate or second one thing? Because you can totally go to town. Please let me know if you only wanted to second one of those two. Metapod posted:Specifically the little child traumatized by cam I'm afraid I can't just change someone else's nomination based on your post. I can, however, give you your own nomination of that specific child. I assume it's a real child, I don't know anything about this incident. Generally guys I do understand that some of you are just being sarcastic but I do not want to be the one to make a judgement call about what was serious or not, so I just record everything like a goddamn robot.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
if any of you have guts you will carry a small child to victory
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 18:06
|
|
|
swickles posted:Haha, this made me decide to compare Manning's performance in each Super Bow with the Broncos because I had a hunch he was actually better in the Seattle game. Turns out that hunch is right times a billion: You have his Colts Super Bowl statlines handy too, out of curiosity?
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 18:53
|
|
|
ulmont posted:You have his Colts Super Bowl statlines handy too, out of curiosity? 25/38 247 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT, 1 sack for 8 yards, QB Rating 81.8
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
31/45 333 yards, TD, INT, 88.5 rating in the loss to the Saints.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 19:54
|
|
|
I believe we've just proved that quarterback performance is unrelated to superbowl winning
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
Cavauro posted:i nominate a little child Seconded if only because I assume you mean Tom Brady
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 01:41
|
|
|
Cavauro posted:i nominate a little child I second the nomination of Jed York, who stole soccer from children. quote:Forbes magazine last week listed the value of the team at $2.7 billion. The Niners, according to Forbes, are the fifth most-valuable team in the NFL and had the biggest one-year increase in value -- 69 percent -- of any team in the league, thanks in large part to moving into the $1.2 billion Levi's Stadium. http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_28832868/mercury-news-editorial-49ers-value-soars-youth-soccer
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
TurboFlamingChicken posted:Seconded if only because I assume you mean Tom Brady wait so should I... did you want to second Tom Brady, or...
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 17:11
|
|
|
Art Briles just got (reportedly) dismissed from Baylor for the same reasons that he's in the bracket. Ken Starr to potentially be fired alongside him. Are they still viable for the bracket?
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
Zurreco posted:Art Briles just got (reportedly) dismissed from Baylor for the same reasons that he's in the bracket. Ken Starr to potentially be fired alongside him. Are they still viable for the bracket? No charges, absolutely. I think we have a front runner! Leperflesh posted:I have diligently added this, but I suspect it will be thrown out for vagueness. It's a no go unless someone can cite a specific child. There is no age limit here.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 17:37
|
|
|
Baylor just catapulted itself into the favorite position https://twitter.com/McMurphyESPN/status/735876290302083072
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 18:14
|
|
|
Baylor, Briles, and Starr are each independent nominees. Right now, Baylor has 1 Second (from BHTW), Briles has two (BHTW and Zurreco), and Ken Starr has no seconds. What is the cutoff date for this year's contest vs. next year?
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 18:17
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:Baylor, Briles, and Starr are each independent nominees. Right now, Baylor has 1 Second (from BHTW), Briles has two (BHTW and Zurreco), and Ken Starr has no seconds. Nominations go til the end of the nomination process, which I am going to let go until next weekend because I have some unexpected work travelling I have to do. Gotta love spending 4 months in Atlanta, being told construction is done on my restaurant, getting home, and being told to go back to Atlanta for 1-2 more weeks because construction was delayed again, when it was originally supposed to be done in March. I'd sarcastically nominate my company for DotY, but the money is too good for me to complain.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 18:33
|
|
|
Febreeze posted:Baylor just catapulted itself into the favorite position they took away an accuser's scholarship
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
Zurreco posted:Art Briles just got (reportedly) dismissed from Baylor for the same reasons that he's in the bracket. Ken Starr to potentially be fired alongside him. Are they still viable for the bracket? More than anything, that proves beyond the shadow of doubt that they're guilty as sin of their douchebaggery.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:Baylor, Briles, and Starr are each independent nominees. Right now, Baylor has 1 Second (from BHTW), Briles has two (BHTW and Zurreco), and Ken Starr has no seconds. Second Ken Starr
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 20:19
|
|
|
I'm gonna go ahead and second all three of them myself, too. I'm also seconding Burfict, Jed York, Johnny Manziel, Whoever at the NFL or ESPN who killed the concussion study, and, I'm nominating Josh Gordon, who in addition to continuing to throw away his incredibly promising football career, decided it was a good idea to go hang out and party with Johnny Manziel. This was a decision a man made who presumably still wanted to play football.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
because the evidence is so overwhelming you should just remove Baylor and co from the running and name the award 'Ben Roethlisberger Douche of the Year Presented by Baylor'
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 20:46
|
|
|
Yeah Ken Starr and Art Briles deserve a ton of poo poo but Baylor as an entire institution should be the runaway winner. Top to bottom they looked at Title IX and what it required and went "eh, gently caress it"
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
rebel1608 posted:Yeah Ken Starr and Art Briles deserve a ton of poo poo but Baylor as an entire institution should be the runaway winner. Top to bottom they looked at Title IX and what it required and went "eh, gently caress it" I guess this is a Second?
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
Eat poo poo Ken Starr you loving dick, you finally get yours.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 20:52
|
|
|
go3 posted:because the evidence is so overwhelming you should just remove Baylor and co from the running and name the award 'Ben Roethlisberger Douche of the Year Presented by Baylor' New thread title
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 21:00
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:I guess this is a Second? Oh sorry yes I am seconding Baylor
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 21:05
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:I'd argue that Baylor shouldn't be eligible as a whole, but I'm willing to listen to arguments about how much or little Art Briles knew about. After reading that report (what they released, keep in mind they weren't required to release anything so it's possible they're holding stuff back), I'm backtracking on this and think Briles, Starr and whoever else should just be rolled up into Baylor. Grittybeard fucked around with this message at 21:29 on May 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 21:11
|
|
|
Roll up team Baylor. I have a feeling they will be the center of the Douche vs. Evil argument this year.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
Ben Has Tiny Weenus posted:Roll up team Baylor. Done. All Briles and Starr nominations and seconds added in to Baylor, which now has seven Seconds. That includes Grittybeard, because he used bold, but that's an assumption.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 22:15
|
|
|
Yeah that was meant to be a second, not that it will be all that necessary to get them in.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 22:18
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:Yeah that was meant to be a second, not that it will be all that necessary to get them in. No, but I believe Ben has said that number of seconds will have seeding implications.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 22:22
|
|
|
I wish to second Vontaze the Mad, Jed York, The Baylor Megadouche Singularity, Johnny loving Football, Geno Smith, Sam Bradford, Russell Wilson, The shithead who hacked Laremy Tunsil's phone, Steven A. I would also like to nominate IK Enemkpali for the Nobel peace prize. ... I... I feel better guys.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 22:49
|
|
|
GenHavoc posted:
Seconding, though I think he also deserves recognition in particle physics as well.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 22:51
|
|
|
How the gently caress is Ken loving Starr still a thing in 2016 
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 22:58
|
|
|
Benne posted:How the gently caress is Ken loving Starr still a thing in 2016 Remember when Baylor was going to sue everyone in the world when the Big 12 looked like it was going to break up? Yeah that was Ken.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 22:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 18:59 |
|
|
Ben Has Tiny Weenus posted:Roll up team Baylor. Strongly leaning towards douche here because of this poo poo http://deadspin.com/baylor-is-full-of-poo poo-1778933505 quote:They also made sure to point out that they are a Christian university, including their “Christian mission” among the bullet points in their press release. Because after all this—after the lies, the coverups, the arrests, the convictions, and the silence—Baylor still has the audacity to cite its Christian mission, oblivious to the fact that if it followed that mission no one would be talking about this in the first place. Baylor can change the names, fire a few people, and release all the fraudulent reports it wants, but where improvement really starts is in showing, at minimum, the ability to give a poo poo. And giving a poo poo entails more than just saying “Sorry” over and over again.  This is Notre Dame levels of smug piousness
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 23:01
|
|