|
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-36516378quote:
No thin people allowed thanks.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:06 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 07:52 |
|
He likes them thicky thicky thick girls.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:07 |
|
Fat Is Beautiful
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:08 |
|
just photoshop rotten white picket fences into the mouths on all the ads
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:09 |
|
muslim man banning provocative images of women in the public sphere? well I never
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:09 |
I predict: a bunch of conservatives super angry about the fact that an organization decided to make choices about what ads they will run on their ad space.
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:10 |
|
someone who is somehow a Muslim and and SJW posted:Mr Khan said: "As the father of two teenage girls, I am extremely concerned about this kind of advertising which can demean people, particularly women, and make them ashamed of their bodies. It is high time it came to an end." Actually, it is being fat that makes fat girls ashamed of their bodies.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:10 |
|
Waroduce posted:Fat Is Beautiful Nope. Just common.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:10 |
|
Sharzak posted:muslim man banning provocative images of women in the public sphere? well I never
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:11 |
Maoist Pussy posted:Actually, it is being fat that makes fat girls ashamed of their bodies. Nah I was skinny as a rail in HS and always felt like poo poo because the models were always just way better looking no matter what I tried. Obviously I didn't realize how extensively everything is airbrushed and shopped at the time but I don't expect little girls to get that, either. Just talk to some bulimics and ask why they started doing it.
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:16 |
|
Maybe people should teach their kids that it's what is on the inside that counts but I guess it's easier to ban anything that could cause someone to feel bad about something
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:20 |
|
Roylicious posted:Nah I was skinny as a rail in HS and always felt like poo poo because the models were always just way better looking no matter what I tried. Little girls have always and will always feel bad, it is in their nature.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:21 |
|
Also Sharzak posted:muslim man banning provocative images of women in the public sphere? well I never
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:21 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:21 |
abigserve posted:Maybe people should teach their kids that it's what is on the inside that counts but I guess it's easier to ban anything that could cause someone to feel bad about something Okay maybe but at the same time our society is absolutely inundated with advertising designed by professionals to influence your actions so... Maoist Pussy posted:Little girls have always and will always feel bad, it is in their nature. Oh okay so when they feel bad because of corporate advertising we should just tell them 'suck it up, buttercup! '
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:22 |
|
This will cut down on my public masturbation. Cut down, not eliminate
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:23 |
|
thin shaming
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:23 |
|
And the one instance where professional advertising is trying to influence you to become a better person, that is the thing you want to ban. Disgusting, and backwards.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:24 |
Yes all those women with eating disorders just failed to get the message of 'improve your image no matter what because thin people are better people' I guess.
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:25 |
|
Bad eating habits are no way to get swole, son.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:26 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35UUsMnwquo
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:26 |
|
Crazy bitches should see a brain doctor.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:27 |
|
I'M BIG BONED!
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:27 |
|
Roylicious posted:Yes all those women with eating disorders just failed to get the message of 'improve your image no matter what because thin people are better people' I guess. I dunno if you've seen the current numbers but obesity is a bigger (hehehe) problem than eating disorders atm. Not that I necessarily think striving to look like digitally altered models is the best way to solve this but there's enough fat activism around that people seem to be pretty okay about stuffing their faces.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:28 |
|
Does this mean Calvin Klein is gonna run an average chubby British dude in their ads or do roided up fitness models not count
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:29 |
|
Let's be honest, gigantic fatlords are fairly "unrealistic" bodies so why not ban them.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:29 |
ArbitraryC posted:I dunno if you've seen the current numbers but obesity is a bigger (hehehe) problem than eating disorders atm. K well that's fine and good but there's nothing wrong with banning certain advertising in spaces where people are unable to escape from it. It isn't fat advocacy to say 'hey let's not have unrealistically attractive people being nonstop paraded in front of kids so their expectations become unrealistic and they get depressed and feel ugly and have self esteem issues for their whole life.' It's not just about eating disorders.
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:29 |
|
Let's cater our society to better suit insane teenage girls
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:29 |
|
photoshop the edges of white frisbees after a pack of inner city pitbulls have had their way with it b/w the lips
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:31 |
The Kingfish posted:Let's cater our society to better suit insane teenage girls If that's really the only thing you can glean from what I'm saying then you're just a closed minded piece of poo poo who is probably over 35 and can't handle an honest internal look at their values and beliefs lest it shatter their shaky self-image to bits. Just like most internet people still posting on forums, I guess.
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:31 |
|
I wonder how the real women that actually exist and have those "unrealistic" bodies feel
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:32 |
|
What if we have Self-Esteem Camps for teenage girls where they are exercised into peak physical condition and kept nude at all times so that they can see actual, realistic body images? EDIT: nobody else can visit the camps where the under-18 girls are kept because that would not be right, let me just be clear on that part.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:33 |
|
Roylicious posted:K well that's fine and good but there's nothing wrong with banning certain advertising in spaces where people are unable to escape from it. It isn't fat advocacy to say 'hey let's not have unrealistically attractive people being nonstop paraded in front of kids so their expectations become unrealistic and they get depressed and feel ugly and have self esteem issues for their whole life.' i dunno this sounds like a problem that could be readily solved by better parenting or maybe even a bit of discussion on the subject in your health classes, outright banning the display of certain images or ideas is something we should be really hesitant about doing imo.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:33 |
|
it's just an elaborate ruse to keep rob liefeld away from london
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:34 |
|
I'm just shitposting. It should be illegal to photoshop models to sell things and advertising in general is AIDS for our minds.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:35 |
|
Long callback to that beach body advert from a few years back. I remember the company owner getting on the PR Twitter and just ripping into the hambeasts that started the controversy.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:37 |
|
most of the modeling agencies are likely using american or eastern European beauties. it is unrealistic for English women to attain these standards of beauty, even if they lost some weight
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:37 |
|
I mean it's still gonna be in all their tv shows, movies, news feed, etc, i doubt bus adverts were the straw that broke the camel's back. it just seems like a stupid feelfood pandering thing instead of an actual step towards any solution.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:38 |
|
Roylicious posted:K well that's fine and good but there's nothing wrong with banning certain advertising in spaces where people are unable to escape from it. It isn't fat advocacy to say 'hey let's not have unrealistically attractive people being nonstop paraded in front of kids so their expectations become unrealistic and they get depressed and feel ugly and have self esteem issues for their whole life.' Right, sorry, it's about ~feelings~. Little Susie has a right to high self-esteem, so let's just tell her she's beautiful even if we don't mean it.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:38 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 07:52 |
ArbitraryC posted:i dunno this sounds like a problem that could be readily solved by better parenting or maybe even a bit of discussion on the subject in your health classes, outright banning the display of certain images or ideas is something we should be really hesitant about doing imo. Well if your public policy relies on better parenting then you're firmly in fantasy lala land anyway I see nothing wrong with regulating what images/advertising can be displayed in areas where people are literally unable to escape from them due to the nature of being on public transport or whatever. It's the same logic as public nuisance/harassment; a company can't just set up a megaphone in front of your house and blast ads at you and claim free speech.
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2016 20:39 |